Thursday, April 29, 2004

Glimmer of Hope in Fallujah Standoff; Bush, Cheney Meet With 9/11 Commission

Glimmer of Hope in Fallujah Standoff; Bush, Cheney Meet With 9/11 Commission

Aired April 29, 2004 - 22:00 ET

THIS IS A RUSH TRANSCRIPT. THIS COPY MAY NOT BE IN ITS FINAL FORM AND MAY BE UPDATED.

AARON BROWN, CNN ANCHOR: Good evening again.There is so much sorrow in the program tonight. I really wonder if you'll stay through it to the end. Will it help if I tell you that by the end you'll find a reason or two to smile? The news is rarely about laughs, of course. This month with a day yet to go has been about so much grief though, so much that we've already forgotten some of it. When did you last think about Thomas Hamill, the truck driver from Mississippi taken hostage in Iraq after his convoy was attacked? Or, how about young Private Matt Maupin from Ohio, the soldier also taken hostage and shown on TVs around the world?We've had so many deaths this month, so much loss, none of us can keep up with it all. It seems we're destined to remember this April, not as we should, for the renewal that spring brings but for the losses and there were more today.The whip begins in Baghdad, ten Americans were killed in an near the city, while in Fallujah a glimmer of hope. Ben Wedeman starts us off with a headline tonight.

BEN WEDEMAN, CNN CORRESPONDENT: A glimmer of hope in the Fallujah standoff, Aaron, but otherwise it's been a grim day for American forces in Iraq.BROWN: Ben, thank you, get back to you at the top.On to Najaf now, that other major flashpoint in Iraq where our Jane Arraf has had a very close brush today, so Jane a headline.

JANE ARRAF, CNN BAGHDAD BUREAU CHIEF: Aaron, a barrage of mortar fire, a few rocket-propelled grenades and a lot of gunfire and the banned militia lets the U.S. Army know it is still here as the Army makes clear it's not going anywhere either -- Aaron.BROWN: Jane, thank you.And the White House finally, President Bush and Vice President Cheney meeting with the 9/11 Commission for more than three hours today. Our Senior White House Correspondent working the story, John King with a headline. 

JOHN KING, CNN SR. WHITE HOUSE CORRESPONDENT: Aaron, the session ran three hours and ten minutes in the Oval Office. The president and the vice president, Mr. Bush said, answered every question asked. A president who once opposed the creation of this commission saying he was glad he did it -- Aaron.

BROWN: John, we'll get back to you and the rest shortly.Also coming up on the program tonight, it's the other war Americans are fighting, the war that many of us seem to have forgotten, the war that many grieving families cannot forget.Plus, the war in Iraq comes extremely close to home. One of our own and his story of being under attack in Fallujah.And no need to get up early tomorrow, we have tonight what you'll be reading when you do get up on your doorstep, morning papers at the end, all that and more in the hour ahead.We begin tonight at the end of one of the worst days for American fatalities this month in Iraq, an especially grim day in a grim month, a difficult year since the president declared major combat over.At the end of the day, ten more Americans are dead and though there seems to be progress in bringing the standoff in Fallujah to a close, combat, both major and minor, goes on.We begin tonight with CNN's Ben Wedeman.

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

WEDEMAN (voice-over): Thursday was a day of more fighting between American forces and their opponents. American bombs dropped on the city's southwest.But there is a glimmer of hope coming from an unlikely source, a group of former officers from Saddam Hussein's army who have come forward with an offer to take a stab at restoring order and convincing the insurgents to lay down their arms.They've told the Marines they can muster as many as 1,000 men who would help diffuse the crisis and take responsibility for security in Fallujah. The Marines accepted their offer but one senior military spokesman told CNN he was only "hopefully optimistic they might be able to field such a force."The talk of a peaceful solution in Fallujah came on a day when American casualties mounted dramatically, eight soldiers with the 1st Armored Division killed by a car bomb south of Baghdad, another American soldier killed in an attack in Baquba, northeast of the capital. Another lost his life in an ambush on his convoy in an eastern Baghdad suburb. A crowd gathered after the attack with some climbing on top of the damaged vehicle chanting "long live Sadr" referring to the Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr whose militia, the Mehdi Army, has taken control of the Shiite holy city of Najaf.(on camera): A reminder that as hopes rise for a resolution in Fallujah, in another part of Iraq another standoff waits to be resolved one way or another.Ben Wedeman, CNN, Baghdad.

(END VIDEOTAPE)

BROWN: Well, as if to underscore that notion of how fluid things are, a moment now in another correspondent's day. It unfolded like many others. It unraveled also like many others. We're especially grateful it did not end like all too many others and that everyone lived to tell the story, the troops, the correspondent, everyone.Here's CNN's Jane Arraf.

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

ARRAF (voice-over): It was a simple checkpoint near Najaf. There's nothing routine though about a city controlled by a Shia militia with U.S. forces on the edges. On only the second day U.S. soldiers have operated these control points there were a few friendly waves and a lot of wary looks.Then suddenly the traffic stopped, a warning to these soldiers from the 2nd Battalion 37th Armored Regiment who had been in Baghdad for a year.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Every time the street is clear we get attacked.ARRAF: Has it happened before?

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: When I was on top of an IP station it happened and then I was in a convoy. We had to stop because they had blocked the road with an overturned truck. There we go. Take cover. Take cover. Take cover. It came from our rear. This is the direction. Stay down.

ARRAF: We did, taking cover near an armored vehicle.(on camera): Just a few minutes ago this was a normal busy street with traffic going back and forth. Now we're in the middle of rocket-propelled grenade and mortar attacks. They're small arms fire and the unit we're with has called in for tanks.(voice-over): Across the bridge at the first American checkpoint there was a virtually simultaneous attack, both believed launched by Muqtada al-Sadr's militia and where we were with the soldiers a mortar platoon attached to the 2nd Armored Cavalry Regiment bided their time. They would have liked to be more aggressive but they're under orders to avoid inflaming tension.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Is anybody hit, anybody injured?

ARRAF: One of the soldiers from headquarters company was grazed by a bullet in the leg. They were all relieved it wasn't worse.CPL. 

KADE CLARK, 37TH ARMORED REGIMENT: It really wasn't that bad. I mean usually when they do hit us it's a lot more but I guess that was just kind of the -- trying to, I don't know a territory spot or I don't know.

ARRAF: Just minutes after the firing ended, Iraqis started to venture out again. An hour later, the soldiers resumed the checkpoint. No one killed in this shootout but a message sent on both sides.

(END VIDEOTAPE)

ARRAF: And it didn't stop there. We're standing in front of a bunker at this U.S. Army base in Najaf city limits but well away from the holy sites. Well before dawn there was a barrage of mortar fire on this base where a few coalition officials from the civilian coalition are staying. U.S. troops continue to build up here they say partly to protect those people and also to send a message that one man cannot take control of a city that's holy to the country and the whole world's Muslims, Shia Muslims -- Aaron.

BROWN: Well, it's Friday there. Is there a particular nervousness about Fridays when all the mosques are full and all the clerics write and read their sermons?

ARRAF: There is and everyone is eagerly awaiting the sermon from one particular cleric, Muqtada al-Sadr, that radical cleric who controls the city of Najaf and Kufa. And, Aaron, as we were at that checkpoint talking to people coming through at the beginning before that firefight broke out, we saw people who were actually fleeing the city of Kufa, adjoining Najaf. They said that they were fearing more violence as U.S. troops are in force here and the militia says that it's just not going anywhere. There's a lot of nervousness here -- Aaron.

BROWN: Jane, thank you. Stay safe. Jane Arraf in Najaf tonight.A lot of moving pieces in the story today. Clearly, reporting anything in Iraq is no small feat, as we've been saying all week. Christine Spolar is the Foreign Correspondent for the "Chicago Tribune," been reporting out of Iraq in and out for the past year. It's good to see her again. Welcome.Let's talk about Fallujah first, this deal. Where do you think it is right now?

CHRISTINE SPOLAR, "CHICAGO TRIBUNE" FOREIGN CORRESPONDENT: Well, it's interesting. We're calling it a tentative agreement and the lieutenant colonel who is quoted saying that there was a deal calls it a plan. So, we will see where this goes. The generals are saying that they're ready to make a plan and the Marines on the ground there are saying that they're willing to do it. I think there's a lot of questions. Whenever you have any kind of agreement in Iraq, in Baghdad, whether it's the government or the military or the police rather, whether it comes true is always another issue.

BROWN: It puts a lot -- assuming it all plays out it puts an enormous responsibility on Iraqi security forces who have not exactly performed with distinction to this point.

SPOLAR: That's true and I think that's a big concern for military officials here in Baghdad. When they heard of the agreement, they said well we've had agreements from some of these people before. The biggest you hear is they hear is they have to produce between 600 and 1,000 people, men, to fill in the ranks of the patrols that they need and they're just not sure that they can do it.There's other issues too. There still has not been a weapons turn out and turnover as the Americans have requested, so that's a very big if for the coalition, so we'll just have to see where it goes.

BROWN: Well, just one more if question here. If this deal plays out as it's been laid out, will it be seen do you think by Iraqis as the capitulation by the Americans?

SPOLAR: Well, that was interesting. I mean we were trying to figure out during the day yesterday if the Marines were withdrawing and, in fact, not saying -- the coalition not admitting that they were, thinking there's some kind of withdrawal and the Iraqis could have some kind of reaction.I don't know. I mean we will see. I would think that the Iraqis in the mood that they are in or, at least some of them, will see this as they've won but who will really win are the people of Fallujah if, in fact, some kind of peace happens there.

BROWN: Yes. Many of them have been out of their homes for a long, long time. Let's move south for a bit. What do you hear about Najaf? Is there a sense that that one at least may very well end peacefully or not yet?

SPOLAR: They really want it to end peacefully. The Americans yesterday were saying that there is no timeline for Najaf, unlike Fallujah. Fallujah they see as they have to get some kind of resolution before the turnover of sovereignty.What they said yesterday is they're willing to wait so that the clerics themselves in Najaf can control Muqtada al-Sadr and bring him in line. They are very willing to work both with the clerics and the business people in Najaf because Najaf is a tourism town and they want things to go well there so that the town is intact. 

BROWN: Is there risk for the clerics to come out too strong against Sadr? Is there risk for business people there who are getting killed in all of this, I don't mean literally killed but their businesses are, for coming out too strong against him?

SPOLAR: I'm not sure of that. I don't think that we understand very well at all the talk between the clerics and clearly the coalition, the American coalition thinks that they have deals sometimes, indications that there is approval from Grand Ayatollah al- Sistani and then they don't.So, I'm not sure that what we think that might go wrong with negotiations in fact has any effect. It's really an internal Iraqi, internal Shiite Muslim issue that we don't have great incite to.

BROWN: It's good to see you again. Thanks for your time and we enjoy your work in the "Chicago Tribune." Thank you very much.Tomorrow we will devote virtually the entire program to Iraq, a year since the end of major combat, as the president declared. In that year, a lot has happened in Iraq and by no means has it all been bad. Much has been accomplished even as clearly much still needs to be done.A year from now we may look at this month, April, differently. We will be 12 months removed. We'll have the benefit of time. We don't have that now. All we have are 29 bad days.

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

BROWN (voice-over): This is how the month began, the killing of four American security contractors. The mutilation and the celebration in Fallujah set the stage and set the tone.

BRIG. GEN. MARK KIMMITT, U.S. ARMY: Quite simply we will respond. We are not going to do a pell-mell rush into the city. It's going to be deliberate. It will be precise and it will be overwhelming.

BROWN: But it was not just the Sunni areas. In the slums of Baghdad and in the Shiite south, the black-clad fighters of a renegade cleric followed demonstrations with repeated attacks on occupation troops.Some day we may see April as part of a larger picture, a necessary chapter to the rebuilding of Iraq but now we mostly remember the dying, seven Americans on a Sunday in Sadr City, a dozen in the town of Ramadi, more on the Syrian border and in the heart of Baghdad.

MICHAEL O'HANLON, SENIOR FELLOW, BROOKINGS INSTITUTION: The American public saw a very bloody month. It began to make you wonder even more than before if this war really was worth it or if we have a clear theory of victory for how to go from here.

BROWN: And the world saw pictures of casualties too, Iraqi bodies, some surely fighters, others likely innocents that wars so often claim.

O'HANLON: The image of the resistance as simply a bunch of former Saddam loyalists is no longer quite true. We now have a lot more people sympathetic to the resistance because they're mad at the United States.

BROWN: April saw a devastating and coordinated series of bombings in the otherwise generally peaceful southern city of Basra. It saw American generals on the ground acknowledging they needed more troops and it saw 20,000 Americans scheduled to come home have their departure delayed.April saw the beginning of the kidnappings, Japanese, Koreans, Russians, French and finally an American soldier on camera, tonight his whereabouts still unknown.Diplomatic policies changed at dazzling speed. A new prime minister in Spain ordered his troops out, a few other countries said they were getting out as well. This deadly month saw a major policy shift. Many Ba'athists, Saddam's party, who had been banned from military and civilian jobs were told those jobs were now available, their leadership skills needed. That is especially true in the new Iraqi security force, which performed very badly in its first major test of its training and willingness to fight.

ROBIN WRIGHT, DIPLOMATIC CORRESPONDENT, "WASHINGTON POST": The United States has taken what it calls modifications but, in fact, amount to major policy shifts.BROWN: As this cruel month draws to an end, the picture of Iraq has changed. Previously banned photographs of flag-draped coffins have now appeared on television.A cease-fire in Fallujah looks more like a pitched battle every day and every night though it does seem that cooler heads may well prevail in the Shiite south.The final toll is clear and troubling, 132 U.S. troops dead, more deaths than in the entire invasion, more deaths than in any other single month and there is no reason to believe it is over.

(END VIDEOTAPE)

BROWN: Still ahead on the program tonight, he was the victim of the war and his wife still grieves. Gene Vance died two years ago in a war the world seems to have forgotten.And later, President Bush and Vice President Cheney before the 9/11 Commission, a break first.From New York this is NEWSNIGHT.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK) 

BROWN: After much ado, the sitting president and vice president of the United States sat down formally today to talk to the 9/11 Commission. By its very nature, we know little beyond the broad headlines of what transpired. That may eventually change. Until now, here's our Senior White House Correspondent John King.

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

KING (voice-over): In the Rose Garden after answering the 9/11 Commission's questions glad he did it was the president's take, no apologies for insisting the vice president be at his side.

GEORGE W. BUSH, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES: If we had something to hide we wouldn't have met with them in the first place. We answered all their questions.

KING: The commission called the session extraordinary and said members "found the president and vice president forthcoming and candid."

LEE HAMILTON, CO-CHAIR, 9/11 COMMISSION: We had a marvelous meeting with the president. The president's comments were very candid, very forthcoming.KING: Administration and commission sources say the topics included the administration assessment of the al Qaeda threat pre-9/11 and August, 2001 intelligence warning that al Qaeda was planning to strike, former White House official Richard Clarke's testimony that Mr. Bush all but ignored the terrorist threat and how Mr. Bush and Mr. Cheney directed the government's response after the attacks.

BUSH: I was impressed by their questions and it was a -- I think it helped them understand how I think and how I run the White House and how we deal with threats.

KING: The president's talk of cooperation struck some as ironic.

JAMES THURBER, AMERICAN UNIVERSITY: Historically this is a unique circumstance where the president of the United States and the vice president have met with a commission that he didn't want to exist and didn't want to appear before.

KING: The historic session in the Oval Office ran three hours and ten minutes. The president and vice president were joined by White House Counsel Alberto Gonzales and two of his deputies. The entire 10-member commission was on hand, as well as a staff member to take notes. Mr. Bush and Mr. Cheney were not under oath and there was no stenographer or tape recording. The commission's final report is due out this summer in the middle of the presidential election.Congressional Republicans already say Democrats on the 9/11 panel are overly partisan and, just Wednesday, the Bush Justice Department released documents Republicans say show commission member Jamie Gorelick made it tougher to track down terrorists when she worked in the Clinton administration.(on camera): But so eager was the president to stress cooperation that the White House publicly rebuked its own Justice Department for making those documents public and Mr. Bush began the Oval Office meeting by telling Gorelick and other commission members he was disappointed and that he wanted no part of the finger pointing.John King, CNN, the White House.

(END VIDEOTAPE)

BROWN: The war in Afghanistan that followed the 9/11 attacks makes fewer headlines these days, though the death last week of former NFL football player Pat Tillman was a reminder of the mission and of the dangers. Fifteen thousand American troops remain in Afghanistan, 80 have died there, and each one has a story.

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

BROWN (voice-over): It's been nearly two years since National Guard Sergeant Gene Vance died fighting in Afghanistan, two years, for some a long time but not for everyone.

LISA VANCE, WIDOW OF SGT. GENE VANCE: I had somebody say to me a couple weeks ago well that's been so long ago, you must be over it by now, and I just looked at them like it was just yesterday. The pain is just like yesterday.

BROWN: At their home in West Virginia, the yellow ribbon has been replaced by a black one. There are remembrances everywhere, outside the home and in. There are daily visits to her husband's grave, an enormous sense of grief and loss.

VANCE: One of the things I lost when I lost Gene was my plans for the future. I kind of live day to day. I don't have any plans for the future anymore.

BROWN: And Lisa Vance wonders if you remember at all. Is she simply the widow of yesterday's war eclipsed by the fresher losses of todays?

VANCE: It seems like I'm going on with my life and the world's forgotten. Everybody is all focused on what's going on in Iraq and we do still have a war going on in Afghanistan and the guys that died over there made just as much of a sacrifice as those that died in Iraq. I think the Afghanistan war is being somewhat forgotten by the American public.

BROWN: When she has sought help from support groups and charities, she says she has been turned away, turned away in ways that seem unimaginable.

VANCE: Some of them would actually say that they're not supporting Enduring Freedom. They have to focus on the casualties in Iraqi Freedom because it's the forefront. 

BROWN: Tonight in the war we tend to forget, just as in the war that dominates the headlines, another Gene Vance may well fall. Another Lisa Vance will grieve. Another life will be forever changed in ways most of us will never really understand.

VANCE: He was the most attentive, adoring, loving husband you could ever imagine. He treated me like a princess but we gave up living happily ever after. He gave up a job. He gave up going -- finishing college. He gave up having kids. We were trying to start a family and we gave up our life together.

(END VIDEOTAPE)

BROWN: Still ahead on the program tonight, back to Iraq, inside Fallujah, a first person account, a break first.Around the world this is NEWSNIGHT.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

BROWN: Well, this is not the story I'm especially comfortable running. Reporters should never be the story and, in most respects, this is a story about one reporter's experience, a co-worker, in Fallujah.In the end I said yes because the piece tells you a good deal about the moments of battle in Fallujah, what they've been like and even more about the young Marines who have been sent there to do the work and take the risks. The central character in the story is CNN Producer Tomas Etzler, his story helped along by Correspondent Bruce Burkhardt.

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)
 

TOMAS ETZLER, CNN PRODUCER (voice-over): I was there as a pool producer for American networks and I (unintelligible) with the NBC crew. I was by myself in that school because the school, as I mentioned perhaps, is on the front lines.

BRUCE BURKHARDT, CNN CORRESPONDENT (voice-over): It was just a little more than two weeks ago, the evening of April the 12th, situated in a school with a platoon of Marines, CNN Producer Tomas Etzler was making a call on a satellite phone. He needed to be outside for the phone to work, so he made his way to a small courtyard in the middle of the building.

TOMAS ETZLER, CNN PRODUCER: I walked to the balcony. It was approximately 12 feet above the courtyard, making the phone calls. And I still managed to dial the number when a huge explosion occurred. It was huge, huge boom. Everything -- it probably was getting kind of dark. But everything went black. 

BURKHARDT: It seemed like a million-to-one shot. An .89- millimeter mortar landed with amazing precision in the middle of the courtyard, the worst possible place for a hit. 

ETZLER: I had pain under my right kidney. Almost immediately, I heard absolutely horrendous screams of the men who were down on the floor, on the down floor when the mortar hit. And I realized all of a sudden there was shooting coming from everywhere. I don't know how many were in that courtyard, but 10 soldiers were hit. And two of them later died. And several of them lost their limbs or part of their limbs. And it was just carnage. 

BURKHARDT: For nearly an hour following the mortar attack, an intense firefight raged. 

ETZLER: Five minutes of such firefight would be enough. I think 10 minutes would be more than enough. But after half an hour, I thought it would never end. It's just -- it's just -- it's just -- this is the first time when I kind of realized, this is real and I don't want to play anymore. I just wanted it to end. 

BURKHARDT: Although bloodied, Tomas' injuries were minor and his news instincts started to kick in. He grabbed his camera. 

 ETZLER: I was adjusting into opening the iris when one Marine saw me and gave me the dirtiest look of anger. I just didn't 

(UNINTELLIGIBLE) 

 because I realize, he's right. He didn't want me to film the carnage. He didn't want me to film that suffering, because the men who suffered or who died -- the men who died, they did not with dignity. They died in a lot of pain. 

BURKHARDT: Something else occurred to Tomas in all this chaos, something that helped him overcome his fear. 

ETZLER: I thought we would be overrun, but I have never seen any -- what gave me the kind of courage was -- or hope -- is the determination of those Marines. I just -- they were calm. They were not panicking. There was no sign of panic. 

BURKHARDT: Early the next morning, Tomas finally did get back to his camera to shoot the aftermath, the cleanup. 

ETZLER: The Marines are usually a very loud bunch. They joke a lot. They talk about movies. They talk about music. They talk about fighting. And that morning, everybody was extremely quiet. And it was kind of an eerie feeling, when you realize what happened there. And I saw a lot of Marines just staring into the yard and there was still disbelief. 

BURKHARDT: Tomas Etzler is back at his regular job now at CNN's international desk in Atlanta, in front of a computer where sterile images conjure up recent memories of a very nonsterile experience. He plans on returning to Iraq in late May. Bruce Burkhardt, CNN, Atlanta. 

(END VIDEOTAPE) 

BROWN: Still to come tonight, a very important confidential house call, the president and vice president in the Oval Office and the 9/11 Commission. David Gergen joins us to talk about that and more. We break first. This is NEWSNIGHT on CNN. 

(COMMERCIAL BREAK) 

BROWN: Well, it's fair to say, we think, that the president didn't envision spending the one-year anniversary of what he called the end of major combat in Iraq meeting with the 9/11 Commission. But testify he did in private, while the fighting in Iraq raged very publicly. What this all means for the history books and the reelection campaign is a wild card of sorts. We're joined tonight from Boston by David Gergen, an adviser to many presidents and now a professor at the John F Kennedy School of Government at Harvard, someone we are always pleased to see.David, welcome. Thank you. 

DAVID GERGEN, HARVARD UNIVERSITY: Thank you, Aaron. It's good to be here again. BROWN: Let's talk about -- I think there's going to be, in all of this, particularly in the absence of a transcript or a record where we know what the president said, a sidebar story which has to do with two of the commission members leaving early. 

GERGEN: Well, Aaron, there is this disturbing report which I understand that CNN has now confirmed, that two members of the commission left before it was over. One was Senator Bob Kerrey and the other has been identified as the co-chair, Lee Hamilton. If that's true and CNN has confirmed it that they left well within an hour left or more of the conversation, that would be a highly disturbing and I think a bizarre event, because the commission has been asking the president and the vice president to talk to them for so long. For people to get up and leave because they have conflicts in their schedules is just -- it is just hard to believe. I'm just incredulous at that. And I trust that in due course they will have explanations about what happened. 

BROWN: Well, I hope so. But, in the meantime, it does seem to help those who have been making the argument on the Republican side pretty aggressively for about three weeks now that commission is too political anyway, the Republicans on the commission, the Democrats on the commission. It is too political. 

GERGEN: If two Democratic members of the commission left early, as the report says, that will undercut the commission's findings. It will make it -- it will give fodder to people on the other side who have said this has been way too politicized. You can just hear the drumbeat that is going to come from conservatives, Republicans, who are saying, couldn't they give time to listen to the president of the United States give his own explanation, whatever the reason was? The president cleared his schedule today. He made himself totally available to the commission, as requested. They hadn't wanted to do it in the White House. They did it. And it just -- I just can't -- I'm still so baffled. I would like to believe it is not true, because it just so violates our sense of how a commission which has weight and is important to the country should operate. And so I'm just -- and I have enormous respect for these two gentlemen. I've known them both for a long time. They've been great public servants. And it is just so baffling that I just hope it is not true. 

BROWN: Well, let's set that aside until we figure out more. 

GERGEN: OK. Sure.

BROWN: Just one quick one. Do you think -- there has been a lot of allegation or charges, a lot of floor speeches that the commission has been very partisan. Just as you've watched this, does it seem that way to you? 

GERGEN: Well, one of the good things about this commission was it started in such a bipartisan spirit. But I must say, the partisan juices among many members of the commission on each side have been running high. And I was one of the ones -- I first thought them going on television and making public pronouncements was fine. It was -- they hoped to open it up to the country. But the longer this has gone on and to hear today's news, I think, really raises questions about sort of how has this been conducted. I just can't tell you how -- this is probably one of the most important investigatory commissions we have had since the Warren Commission looked at the Kennedy assassination. Americans very much deserve to know and have a balanced, fair, comprehensive report about what happened on 9/11. So we can assure ourselves not only was there no negligence on the part of American officials -- and I don't think the commission is going to reach that judgment -- but indeed that we have got a -- we're on the path toward making things better.And we have had a commission of distinguished people come together and really put their minds and hearts into trying to do something good for the country. And so there has been this partisan overtone recently that I think has been terribly unfortunate, because most Americans are not looking for partisan answers out of it. They really just want to know what happened, especially the families want to know what happened. 

BROWN: I think that -- boy, the last just sentence or two there is exactly right. I think that by and large the country doesn't see this politically, isn't interested in the politics of it, just wants to know the truth of it. David, go nurse that cold.

GERGEN: OK, Aaron. Thank you so much.

BROWN: Thank you, David Gergen, in Boston tonight. Before we break, a couple of quick business notes. Google the letters IPO on Google and the name Google pops up, as it would. The creator of the search engine that has became both a noun and a verb finally came forth today with plans to take itself public, hopes to raise about $3 billion. The IPO expected to raise that and about $17 billion more. Man. It's like the old days, isn't it?Just a month after cutting 20 percent of the work force -- this is like the new days -- computer maker Gateway is cutting 40 percent of what is left. That adds up to about 1,500 jobs. It leaves Gateway with 2,000 employees, down from 25,000 four years ago. And this will break your heart, if you're old enough. In Lansing, Michigan, the last Oldsmobile rolled off the assembly line today, the Alero. And if you have never heard of that, that's the reason General Motors gave Olds the ax. Couldn't sell it to younger buyers, by and large. Markets, meantime, took another hit, better than yesterday, but hardly good. Nasdaq is really getting jammed up there. Not much good news to bring the market, carry the markets forward. 

Ahead on NEWSNIGHT, a journey to New Orleans' Congo Square and a trip to American history. Welcome to Jazz Fest and a welcome break from the sorrow, Jazz Fest in stills. This is NEWSNIGHT. 

(COMMERCIAL BREAK) 

BROWN: In a day and a week heavy on war news, a change of gears now. The New Orleans Jazz and Heritage Festival is celebrating its 35th year. Since it started, photographer Michael P. Smith has been documenting the artists who make the music. As we see it, making pictures of music might be one of the toughest assignments around. Mr. Smith has succeeded splendidly. His images are silent, but they are not quiet. The photographer is slowing down, but the work speaks for itself. 

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE) 

QUINT DAVIS, FESTIVAL DIRECTOR: 2004 is the 35th anniversary of the New Orleans Jazz and Heritage Festival. It started in 1970 in a little square downtown called Congo Square, which is the birthplace of African music in North America. Mike Smith has been a part of Jazz Fest the entire 35 years. Mike Smith is really the chronicler of this culture. 

HERMAN LEONARD, PHOTOGRAPHER: He is sort of a laid-back, quiet fellow. Doesn't go out and push his work. Jazz is the only true really uniquely American art form. And here we have Michael, who has done this wonderful documentation of all these people. DAVIS: We came up with the idea this year to have our 35th anniversary through the eyes of Mike Smith. Outside of the festival, all around the grounds, we have these kiosks. And they're called "Mike Smith Memories." The people who are at the festival are just like us and just like Mike Smith. Many of them have been here 10 and 20 years. 

LESLIE SMITH, DAUGHTER OF MIKE SMITH: My father has Parkinson's. And he's moving a little slower than he used to. So I've been carrying his stuff, just kind of being there if he needs something, and going around, taking photos, like he always has. DAVIS: There are generations that have grown up with Mike Smith taking their picture, older generations that have passed on and then new generations come along. So we can trace the growth, the young Neville brothers, the older Neville brothers, Bonnie Raitt in the '70s, B.B. King in the '70s. B.B. King played on the festival in 1972. To make that leap, our little hometown festival had the king of the blues. It was a great occasion. And Mike Smith took this classic, classic picture of him. Well, the next year, in 1973, B.B. came back. We got this picture, had it framed, gave it to him on the stage. And that was me giving him the picture. Just as live music itself is a participatory art form, one of the only art forms where the audience and the artist experience the art together, well, Mike Smith is like that. He's like music, because, at our festival, when people look at his pictures, they're experiencing something that they experienced before. 

JON CLEARY, MUSICIAN: The pictures he has of musicians are musicians at work. You see them busting a sweat and you can see them really digging in, kind of the essence of what New Orleans music is all about. 

SMITH: My father captured energy. The thing that interests him when he's photographing is energy, passion. When he feels that moment, when it is just raw aliveness, that's what he shoots. He feels that the -- what he's capturing is what is special. Maybe in his secret heart, he understands how amazingly important all of this is. But I think ultimately for him, he just wanted to make sure that someone knew that there was a record of this amazing, wonderful culture we have here and that someone would know. 

(CHEERING AND APPLAUSE)

 (END VIDEOTAPE) 

BROWN: Told you there would be something to make you smile tonight. Morning papers, which may or may not make you smile, after the break. 

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

 (ROOSTER CROWING) 

BROWN: Okeydoke, time to check morning papers from around the country, around the world. We'll start, as has been our custom of late, with "The International Herald Tribune," published by "The New York Times" in Paris. Leads with Google. "Google Is Headed For Wall Street. Web Search Pioneer to Raise $2.7 Billion in Drive to Take on Microsoft and Yahoo!" Google and Yahoo!, all those funny names. "Deal to End Fallujah Standoff Is Set." That pretty much shows up on every front page.Here is a story that is getting a lot of play in Britain, a fair amount of play here. "U.S. Military in Torture Scandal." 

This is a story "60 Minutes" did on CBS the other night, because there are pictures of Iraqi prisoners or detainees being mistreated. It would certainly seem that's one of them, thought it's a little tricky to tell what is going on there. Here is a part of the story I did not know and that is really troubling, actually. "Use of Private Contractors in Iraqi Jail Interrogations Highlighted By Inquiry Into Abuse of Prisoners." I think six American soldiers are headed for court-martial. The general in charge has got some issues, too. More on this as we learn more. But it's a pretty good story and an unfortunate story. 

This is "The Washington Times." "Bush Tells Panel Memo Lacked Data, Nothing New There, Not Enough Intelligence To Prevent 9/11 Strikes." That's pretty much what the White House has been saying. This is a story that hasn't got a lot of attention either today, but probably should have. "Britain Seeks Legal Resolution For Deployment After June 30," wants something out of the U.N. 

"Cincinnati Enquirer." I always wondered how rich Marge Schott was. And now I know. "Marge Schott Heirs Get Share in $100 Million, But Most of Estate Goes to Charity." We're just about out of time, aren't we? OK. I always think I'm going to get to all of these. Don't. I'm getting there. 

The weather tomorrow in Chicago, according to "The Chicago Sun- Times," is "droopy." It sounds humid to me. It may get humid here, too. A couple of other items before we go. We'll take a break first. We'll be right back. 

(COMMERCIAL BREAK) 

BROWN: Consider this. A bare 10 years after the end of the only war this country has only lost, a war that tore America apart while it was being fought and still tears at us today, there was already a Vietnam Memorial in Washington. And yet World War II, which united the country, which made it a world power, which every history book accounts as one of the great triumphs of all time, World War II has had to wait almost 60 years for its memorial -- until today, in fact.

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE) 

BROWN (voice-over): Construction hasn't taken that long, really, just 30 months. But the bill authorizing the memorial goes back to 1993. And the idea goes back another six years to a conversation at a fish fry between a World War II vet and an Ohio congresswoman. But even that is not so bad when you think about it for something so grand, 17 years from suggestion to reality. But that was already more than 40 years after the fact; 16 million Americans served in World War II, in which there were 400,000 military deaths. And 42 years went by before anyone proposed a place to stand and think about that. It is almost as if those remarkable men and women thought it was honor enough simply to have served. Their breathtaking modesty makes them even more honorable to us. The World War II memorial is open to the public now and will be formally dedicated on the 29th of May.

 (END VIDEOTAPE) 

BROWN: Quickly, a look ahead. Soledad O'Brien with what is coming up tomorrow on "AMERICAN MORNING." 

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP) 

SOLEDAD O'BRIEN, CNN ANCHOR: Thanks, Aaron. Tomorrow on "AMERICAN MORNING," an author who thinks he has cracked the secret world of men. And that could mean a lot of things. He says it is not all about lying around on a sofa. In fact, he has coaxed 27 men to reveal their innermost secrets of love and relationships and lust. Do you believe men are talking about that? That's CNN tomorrow, 7:00 a.m. Eastern -- Aaron, back to you.

(END VIDEO CLIP) 

BROWN: Thank you. Finally, here's something I never thought I would have to say. I made my animated debut last night. We thought we would share with the class. 

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP, "SOUTH PARK") 

UNIDENTIFIED ACTOR: This is breaking news. Here is anchorman Aaron Brown. 

UNIDENTIFIED ACTOR: Incredible, absolutely amazing news today. A man from the future has come back in time and is in a government hospital after being hit by a car. 

UNIDENTIFIED ACTOR: Whoa. 

UNIDENTIFIED ACTOR: Christina Nailon (ph) has more. 

(END VIDEO CLIP) 

 BROWN: I've never been cooler to my daughter's friends. 

We'll see you tomorrow. Good night for all of us at NEWSNIGHT. 

TO ORDER A VIDEO OF THIS TRANSCRIPT, PLEASE CALL 800-CNN-NEWS OR USE OUR SECURE ONLINE ORDER FORM LOCATED AT www.fdch.com

Tuesday, April 27, 2004

Fighting in Fallujah; Supreme Court Reviews Cheney's Meetings With Task Force

Fighting in Fallujah; Supreme Court Reviews Cheney's Meetings With Task Force
 

Aired April 27, 2004 - 22:00 ET
 

THIS IS A RUSH TRANSCRIPT. THIS COPY MAY NOT BE IN ITS FINAL FORM AND MAY BE UPDATED.
 

AARON BROWN, CNN ANCHOR: Good evening again.We'll spend a fair amount of time tonight on the overnight fighting in Fallujah but it will be some time before we really understand its significance. Daylight will help some. We'll see the damage done, get a better guess of the casualties on each side but even that will be only a small part of a larger story.Will the firefight today made grander, we suspect, by the presence of cameras become a rallying cry for those in Iraq and the rest of the Arab world who already believe the worst about the United States? Will a majority of Iraqis, on the other hand, say the insurgents are making our lives a mess, both in the Sunni Triangle and in the south and better to deal with them now, however they have to be dealt with, than live like this forever, and that could happen?Whichever it is will matter, making things more or less safe for the Americans and the Iraqis alike depending but which it is, how it will play we do not yet know. It may be some time before we do.We start with what we do know and CNN's Jamie McIntyre at the Pentagon. It begins the whip, Jamie a headline.

JAMIE MCINTYRE, CNN SR. PENTAGON CORRESPONDENT: Well, despite today's devastating air strikes in Fallujah, the Pentagon insists a cease-fire is still in effect but you would be forgiven if you were confused about that cease-fire what with all the bullets flying and people dying.BROWN: Jamie, thank you. We'll get to you at the top tonight. On to the political backdrop until July when it becomes the main event. CNN's David Ensor covering the sovereignty question and the new ambassador too, David a headline.

DAVID ENSOR, CNN NATIONAL SECURITY CORRESPONDENT: Well, Aaron, at the U.N. and here in Washington, the pieces are being put in place for a different Iraq starting on the last day of June. The U.N.'s envoy Lakhdar Brahimi told the Security Council with Iraqi help he can and will put together a proposed government of technocrats and non-politicians to get Iraq through the next six to eight months until elections can be held. And, the first American ambassador to that new Iraq went before the Senate for confirmation hearings -- Aaron.

BROWN: David, thank you.And finally to the White House where all eyes were on the Supreme Court and what it might say about the vice president and his energy advisory board. Our Senior White House Correspondent John King with us tonight, so John a headline.

JOHN KING, CNN SR. WHITE HOUSE CORRESPONDENT: Aaron, the issue is secrecy and, as you noted, the vice president's energy task force but this for the vice president is an issue he feels passionate about, a fight he has been waiting to fight for 30 years -- Aaron.

BROWN: John, thank you. We'll get back to you and the rest shortly.Also coming up on the program tonight it's Republican versus Republican in Pennsylvania where a well known incumbent might be in trouble. The race has gone down to the wire and will help define what the Republican Party is these days.Plus, the pictures and the sounds of Fallujah and Iraq, the most shock and awe if you will we've seen in a while.And that, of course, will dominate morning papers too we suspect. We'll take a look at the papers that will land on your doorstep bright and early tomorrow morning, all that and more in the hour ahead.We begin tonight in Fallujah the morning after a night of heavy bombardment from American gunships. It came, according to the U.S. military, in response to insurgent activity but does not, they say, necessarily signal the end of a shaky cease-fire that has existed in Fallujah for more than a week, a slim distinction perhaps but an important one.Marines surrounding the city enjoy an overwhelming advantage in raw power. Using that power, however, remains a political and strategic risk. So, as the night unfolded in Fallujah the Marines stayed put letting air power do most of the work, at least the work we could see.We have several reports tonight beginning with Karl Penhaul who is embedded with the Marines on the outskirts of Fallujah.

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

KARL PENHAUL, CNN CORRESPONDENT (voice-over): Nighttime in northwest Fallujah, a brief calm after a day of sporadic mortar and sniper attacks by Iraqi insurgents on U.S. Marine bases.Then the low drone overhead of a U.S. AC-130 Specter gunship, a modified transport plane. The thump of its 105mm cannons, then flashes light up the darkness. Round after round pound into suspected insurgent positions about three-quarters of a mile from where we're filming. Showers of sparks fly high, the glow of a fire set off by the air strike. Then slowly plumes of dense, black smoke drift across the Fallujah skyline. The gunship wheels around and returns to send cannon rounds slamming into a second suspected insurgent position close to the first.U.S. military officials say the strike was carried out by two Specter gunships. They say it was in response to a specific threat not the start of an all out offensive to seize back control of the city. This northwest sector of Fallujah is in the hands of Iraqi insurgents and what coalition authorities say are foreign fighters linked to al Qaeda.A little more than two weeks ago, coalition forces agreed to a cease-fire with civic and religious leaders in an effort to halt the heavy fighting but Marine commanders say the insurgents have refused to heed the call for a truce or to lay down their weapons and, with this latest air strike, coalition commanders appear to be hitting home the message to those insurgents surrender or face the consequences.Karl Penhaul reporting with the camera of John Templeton (ph) for the U.S. networks pool, Fallujah, Iraq.

(END VIDEOTAPE)

BROWN: When the Iraqi dead from this battle are buried chances are it will be in a soccer stadium that used to be called the Fallujah Sports Club. It is known today as the Fallujah Martyrs Cemetery, the name underscoring a reality.There are two wars being fought in Fallujah, seen differently by the two sides for many reasons, including how the events are being reported. Today, Secretary of State Powell told the foreign minister of Qatar that coverage undermines relations between the two countries. Al-Jazeera is based in Qatar and this is what he was talking about.

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

BROWN (voice-over): The most watched newscast in the Arab world had clearly the best pictures of the night fighting in Fallujah and this is how their reporters described the scene."Severe clashes broke out tonight," says the Al-Jazeera reporter "between the American occupying forces and the Iraqi resistance fighters." There is no mention in the report of the Marine explanation that the attack began when the Iraqis started to fire on American units.This is what the Al-Jazeera correspondent reported. "A civilian house was severely destroyed. Two civilian cars were hit, one of the drivers wounded."On a different Arab television network Al Arabiya, a telephone report from one of its correspondents painted a horrible picture of civilian casualties in Fallujah on the order of 500 civilians killed, he said, 1,200 wounded. "More innocent Iraqi civilians are dying," said the Al Arabiya reporter. "What can be done at this point?" And then a man described by Al Arabiya as a military expert said by phone: "I wish all these people in Baghdad would live one night out of the last 23 nights in Fallujah so they can see with their own eyes what is going on here."There were no American military officials interviewed in the broadcasts that we saw.

(END VIDEOTAPE)

BROWN: And that is the version that most of the Arab world saw tonight.Now on to the whys of the story and perhaps the why not as well, why the bombardment, why not a broader invasion and why the coalition doesn't yet want to abandon a cease-fire that in truth barely exists?So from the Pentagon tonight, CNN's Jamie McIntyre.

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

MCINTYRE (voice-over): The U.S. military says this is not the Fallujah offensive but rather an aggressive self defense in response to hostile fire. For Marines who come under constant attack from the insurgents, the cease-fire is about ten percent cease and 90 percent fire.Here in video shot by pool journalists accompanying U.S. forces into combat, the Marines go after enemy fighters holed up in a mosque. One Marine was killed, several wounded in the fierce engagement and a tank took out the mosque's minaret the U.S. says was being used as a sniper's nest.The use of a place of worship to conduct military operations violates the Geneva Conventions and prompted Defense Secretary Rumsfeld to offer some advice and criticism to headline writers.

DONALD RUMSFELD, DEFENSE SECRETARY: Terrorists attack coalition forces from mosques. That would be one way to present the information. Another might be to say mosques targeted in Fallujah. That was the "Los Angeles Times" headline this morning.

MCINTYRE: The Pentagon says the Marines are holding off on the final push into Fallujah to give the failing negotiations with go- betweens one more chance.

RUMSFELD: But they believe what they're doing and the pace at which they're doing it is net in the interest of their goals.

GEN. RICHARD MYERS, CHAIRMAN, JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF: It's worth a try.

RUMSFELD: It's worth a try.

MCINTYRE: Right after those hopeful comments, two U.S. AC-130 gunships pounded targets in Fallujah in response to what the U.S. says was another cease-fire violation, an attack on Marines dug in to defensive positions, just one more sign a showdown is coming.

(END VIDEOTAPE)

MCINTYRE: Leaflets dropped over Fallujah urged the insurgents to give up saying that they're surrounded. The leaflet says "we're coming to arrest you." It also says "if you are a terrorist beware because your last day was yesterday" -- Aaron.

BROWN: Let me throw out a question. I think it's going to come back a couple of times yet tonight. From the perspective of the Pentagon in terms of the long term stability of Iraq how dangerous do they believe going in there and sort of clearing out the city in a big offensive movement how dangerous is that to the stability of the country?

MCINTYRE: Well, they're very concerned about creating an anti- U.S. backlash with this operation and, what we're told from Pentagon officials is don't look for a big shock and awe offensive in which a lot of things are going to happen at once. What you're going to see, they say, is a very slow, methodical, deliberate targeting of insurgents gradually and increasing the pressure on them and trying to minimize civilian casualties. They're very sensitive and upset about the coverage that this has been getting in the Arab press that you mentioned tonight. They insist that it's been distorted and that the U.S. has been taking great pains to avoid civilian casualties and because of that they're looking for, as I said, a slow, methodical campaign not something that's going to start with a big splash.

BROWN: Jamie, thank you again, Jamie McIntyre at the Pentagon tonight.In just 64 days, two months and change, Iraqis are scheduled to take back control of their country more or less more so than they now have. They'll run the day-to-day affairs of Iraq but they'll not control security and they will not likely be able to pass laws.The most powerful person in Iraq will not be an Iraqi at all. It will be an American, as it is now. That American the president's choice to be the new ambassador went before the Senate today.CNN's David Ensor joins us with more on that and other diplomatic matters from Washington, David good evening.

ENSOR: Good evening, Aaron.Well, the devil is certainly in the details and there were not many on offer before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee today as U.N. Ambassador John Negroponte appeared seeking confirmation as this nation's first ambassador to the new Iraq.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP) 

SENATOR CHUCK HAGEL (R), NEBRASKA: Would you understanding of a limited, sovereign Iraqi government have veto authority over proposed military action like going into Fallujah, for example?

JOHN NEGROPONTE, U.S. AMBASSADOR TO THE U.N.: I think that that is going to be the kind of situation that is going to have to, in addition to everything else, be the subject of real dialogue between our military commanders, the new Iraqi government and I think the United States mission as well.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

ENSOR: Committee members praise Negroponte's courage for being willing to take the job, all the more so said some Democrats since they say they believe international support is waning. Negroponte said that though the sovereignty Iraqis will regain June 30th will be limited in some ways, it will be much more than they've had thus far and he expects a greater sense of Iraqi ownership of their country should be a real step forward -- Aaron.

BROWN: He goes over there, assuming he's confirmed, he takes office on the 1st of July, right?

ENSOR: That's right. 

BROWN: Just in the sort of day to day, do we really know how different life will be in Iraq on the 1st of July?

ENSOR: Well, he talked about the ministries of the new Iraqi government taking over more and more control of the everyday life of the country but he conceded that on the security front there isn't an Iraqi army worthy of the name that can take over yet. It's going to be quite some time before American and coalition forces are able to leave that country.

BROWN: And we still don't know who is in that government and that will be a month before we do?

ENSOR: Well, Lakhdar Brahimi said today that he thinks he can put together a government of technocrats and people who are not going to run for office in the parliament later on and he'll be able to name that by about the 1st of June, which will give this group about a month to get ready to take power.

BROWN: David, thank you, David Ensor in Washington.Two cities clearly dominated the headlines out of Iraq today, Fallujah of course, the other Najaf where funerals were held after a pair of battles between the militia of Muqtada al-Sadr and American forces. The U.S. reports as many as 64 rebels were killed.Another piece of the picture, all of it being reported ably in the pages of the "New York Times" by John Burns and his colleagues. Mr. Burns joins us tonight from Baghdad. It's good to see you, John. Thank you. First on Fallujah, what are you hearing the damage was last night?

JOHN BURNS, "NEW YORK TIMES": Well, I think everybody was very surprised at the sudden turn of events. Towards nightfall in Baghdad on Tuesday, what we were hearing from the American military commanders and from Mr. Bremer and his officials here in Baghdad was a distinct turn towards a peaceful solution in Fallujah, an emphasis on attempts to lure the insurgents in Fallujah, if you will, into the American program of reconstruction and peace.And then all of a sudden towards the middle of the evening here all hell broke loose in Fallujah and it's unclear yet quite why that was. There was a cease-fire violation alleged by the Americans but I don't think that even they had imagined that things could turn quite so violent in such a short period of time.And I think it will some time before we know what the downstream consequences of this are, whether it's still realistic to believe that there can be a peaceful outcome in Fallujah or not.

BROWN: Just this question of downstream consequences, which is an interesting phrase, take Fallujah on the one hand and Najaf on the other, beyond the difference in the characters in each place how are these two cities and the fights that are going on for the two cities different in terms of the problems the Americans face?

BURNS: Well, of course, the principal characteristic of Najaf is that it's the holiest city in the Shiite world and that Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani, the most powerful of all the Shiite clerics has declared a red line, as he calls it, around Najaf and it has seemed increasingly unlikely that the United States military command here will want to deal with Muqtada al-Sadr, the rebel cleric, Shiite cleric, by going into Najaf.I think that they hope that the Shiite religious establishment will deal with that, that public opinion will deal with that and that Mr. Sadr's supporters will kind of melt away. There's been some evidence that that's happening already.The attack on his forces north of Kufa, outside of the Najaf area but not very far that killed 65 of his people, 64, 65 of his people on Monday, it's quite notable that the bodies as they were loaded into trucks in Najaf yesterday to be carried away for burial they were not wearing his black uniforms.This seems to be a result of the rise of a new militia, a kind of shadowy death squad, if you will, that has started killing Sadr's own people. It's possible that Sadr's power could begin to evanesce and that the one thing that might save him would be an American invasion of Najaf itself, which would rally people to his side.BROWN: John, on that point, I saw your reporting on that this morning that there is this group. Do we know anything about this group and who they are aligned with, if they are aligned, where their loyalties are?

BURNS: We know nothing at all about it. I think the American military command knows nothing at all about it but I think you have to put it together with the sermons that have been made in the principal mosques of Najaf against Muqtada al-Sadr with what we're hearing from our own people down in Najaf which is that public opinion has moved strongly against him.And, I think that the American command can hope by simply increasing military pressure outside the city, without going into the city, that Muqtada al-Sadr will be bankrupted by these events that his people under threat of assassination and a number of them have been assassinated we believe, four of five of them in the last 72 hours, that the jig could be up for him there and that it's better to stay out than to go in.I think Fallujah is a different case all together. They have a very large group of insurgents in Fallujah, according to American military estimates, perhaps as many as 2,000, among them probably 200 or so hardcore al Qaeda-linked fighters. This is a city only 30 miles from Baghdad astride one of the principal highways connecting Baghdad in this case to Jordan.I think they've always known they would have to do something about it but there seems to have been a decision prior to last night's eruption of violence to try and deal with that too in a peaceful way. That's always seemed very improbable to me. Last night's events seem to make it even more improbable and there looks like a rocky road for the American military to travel in Fallujah before that situation can be resolved, if it can be resolved.

BROWN: I know you have a lot of work ahead of you today. We appreciate the time you're able to give us always. Thank you. Stay safe. John Burns of the "New York Times" with us tonight.One more item here before we go to break. Hard to know precisely what to make of this, especially the whys. There were explosions and a gun battle in the streets of the Syrian capital today, Damascus. Witnesses heard at least six loud explosions around eight o'clock local time in the evening, a neighborhood housing a number of western and Iranian diplomats.Syrian authorities say a group of terrorists set off a bomb, then shot at and tossed grenades at police, the battle lasting about an hour. Four people died, two militants, one Syrian officer and a bystander. No word yet on who was behind the mayhem today in Damascus.Ahead on the program tonight, top secret business or business as usual, the vice president's case goes to the U.S. Supreme Court.Also coming up the primary race in Pennsylvania down to the wire. We'll check on that too.From New York this is NEWSNIGHT.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK) 

BROWN: Sometime this summer the U.S. Supreme Court will decide whether the White House has the constitutional right to keep the details of the vice president's energy task force secret. We know that many oil industry executives met with the vice president, including Enron's Ken Lay but we know far less about what role they or other interest groups had in the actual formation of policy.At the heart of the case are two differing views of the presidency itself and the White House belief that over two generations the presidency has been dangerously weakened.Here's our Senior White House Correspondent John King.

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

KING (voice-over): On the campaign trail, a very public role leading the attack against Democrat John Kerry.

DICK CHENEY, VICE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES: It is irresponsible to vote against vital support for the United States military.

KING: But this a vice president whose most important work is done in private in the Oval Office here and who is the leader of an aggressive effort to defend a president's right to conduct some business in secret.

ALBERTO GONZALES, WHITE HOUSE COUNSEL: Well, you know, we don't operate in government on a baseline that everything is open to the public.

KING: At issue now, the Supreme Court case about whether some records of the vice president's energy task force should be made public. A lower court said yes and the White House appealed.Democrats in Congress and other critics call it proof of a White House obsessed with secrecy on issues ranging from the energy task force to blocking access to information about terror suspects detained at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

CHERYL MILLS, FORMER CLINTON WHITE HOUSE DEPUTY COUNSEL: This administration is much more conservative on the issue or privilege and much more I'd say aggressive about asserting it or asserting those things that are similar to it.

KING: Not so says the president's top lawyer.

GONZALES: In most cases we are able to reach an accommodate and that's why in the history of this administration only once has this president asserted executive privilege.

KING: Just recently, these compromises. The 9/11 Commission finally won access to a presidential intelligence briefing Mr. Bush received five weeks before the terrorist attacks and National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice testified before the commission after months in which the White House said no. 

NORMAN ORNSTEIN, AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INST.: Every president, liberal or conservative, Democrat or Republican, oftentimes faced with immediate political pressures has kind of caved or given in on executive responsibilities.

KING: That the White House did not give in this time and appealed the energy task force case to the Supreme Court reflects Mr. Cheney's unrivaled clout within the White House.

(END VIDEOTAPE)

KING: And it reflects this vice president's passionate view that over the past 30 years, presidential privilege and presidential power has eroded dangerously, in his view, Aaron, beginning in Watergate, the vice president believes, and including a decision made by the first president he worked for Gerald Ford to give into pressure and to testify to Congress about his controversial decision to pardon Richard Nixon -- Aaron.

BROWN: Tests and the limits of presidential power and authority go back to the Supreme Court tomorrow in the Padilla -- I think it's tomorrow, I know it's this week, the Padilla and Hamdi cases that may be the most controversial of all.

KING: Certainly more significant if you are looking at the continued prosecution of the war on terrorism. This administration making the case that it has the right in some cases to deny attorneys to those being held, as suspects at Guantanamo Bay and elsewhere and that it has the right to deny information, the administration drawing a very hard line on these key issues. And, you are right, those arguments tomorrow in the Padilla case.

BROWN: Even when they are American citizens in the cases of Padilla and Hamdi.

KING: If the administration believes it can meet the test that they are a terrorist threat operating within this country it believes it has extraordinary rights. Again, that is one of the few questions and on this question in the lower courts and even at the Supreme Court there's been a great deal of skepticism. Tomorrow's arguments will be quite interesting.

BROWN: I think they're going to be fascinating. John, thank you, John King our White House Correspondent tonight.A few other items that made news around the country today. Senator John Kerry has accepted an invitation to give a speech at Westminster College in Missouri. You may remember that yesterday the vice president lit into him at that university. Shortly thereafter the college president invited Mr. Kerry saying he was distressed that the vice president used the speech at his college for attacks.The wreckage of a missing Army helicopter was found tonight in a patch of woods near Interstate 97 in South Carolina, no sign of survivors at the scene. The three crewmen now presumed to have perished.And police in Phoenix, Arizona are looking for a gunman who shot and killed two people at a trucking company there this morning. They do have a suspect, a man named Howard Fisk (ph) who they say knew the victims and had threatened them recently.Still to come on NEWSNIGHT tonight, shaky cease-fires in the north, militant uprisings in the south, why the whole of Iraq seems to be caught up in a most uncivil war, a break first.Around the world this is NEWSNIGHT.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

BROWN: It will be a year ago this weekend that the president declared major combat over in Iraq. What has become painfully clear is that the relatively easy victory on the road to Baghdad a year ago told but a part of the story. One statistic tells a lot: 150 Americans died in the march to Baghdad a year ago; 150 Americans have died so far this month in Iraq. For those that know the region, Fallujah and Najaf are always potential land mines. Ken Pollack joins us from Washington. He is the director of the Saban Center of Middle East Policy at the Brookings Institution and an analyst for us. Here in New York, Bernard Haykel. He teaches Middle Eastern and Islamic studies at New York University. And we're glad to have you both here. Professor, let me start with you. Is it the -- Jamie McIntyre at the Pentagon reported earlier that there was this hope that maybe the insurgents in Fallujah would kind of buy into the program, that they have a future in the country. They'll get their sewers fixed, the water running, the schools rebuilt, the hospitals going and everything will be OK for them and there will be a peaceful way out of this. Is there, do you think? Is that realistic? 

BERNARD HAYKEL, NEW YORK UNIVERSITY: No, I think that one has to look at the reasons why they really are so adamantly against the U.S. occupation. If you look at the people there, most of them are officers at the two bases that were in the area. They worked in the army. They were high officers in the army of Saddam Hussein. And they're out of a job. They've been out of a job and they have no prospects of coming back in. And one of the mistakes we made was to disband the army. BROWN: Well, but we tried to correct that last week. 

HAYKEL: But, clearly, they haven't been given sufficient guarantees. And more importantly they represent the Sunni Arab population, who feel that they're the losers in all of this. 

BROWN: Well, they are the losers in all of this. 

HAYKEL: And they will be spoilers as long as we don't give them some guarantee of a role in the future of Iraq. 

BROWN: Ken, let's just stay in Fallujah before we move south. Is there in your mind, other than rewriting history, which neither of us can do, none of us can do, is there a peaceful way out of this or is it going to end ugly this week, next week, a month from now, some point? 

KENNETH POLLACK, CNN ANALYST: Aaron, I've got to be honest with you. I'm really distressed by what I'm seeing in Fallujah. As you point out, I think the best answer was never to have started down this course. You'll remember when you and I spoke the night that those four contractors were mutilated in Fallujah, a point that I tried to make was, we shouldn't concentrate on revenge; we should concentrate on preventing future incidents like this, because trying to deal with the situation in Fallujah through violence was not going to work.And unfortunately that's the path we have started down. And I think we have got ourselves into a real catch-22. If we go into Fallujah, even though it is the Marines and they're very good at this and they will proceed as best they can, it is still a very high likelihood that we're going to have a lot of bloodshed, a lot of stuff for Al-Jazeera to put on the air.On the other hand, if we don't go into Fallujah, we're going to be handing a huge psychological victory to the resistance in Fallujah, who -- I absolutely agree with Dr. Haykel -- they feel completely alienated from the process of reconstruction. 

BROWN: Just going back to the beginning, again, we can't change this, but if you're at the CPA or you're at -- in the American military, and you see this incredible scene of lawlessness that played out, where the four contractors died, their bodies mutilated, hung from bridges, the whole nine yards, you've got to do something. Don't you lose face in the country by doing nothing also? 

POLLACK: Certainly, doing nothing is difficult to do. But I think that you need to recognize that there is a difference between steps that can help you down the road and steps that can make the situation worse. And I think that concentrating on Fallujah would have been a smart thing. But simply mounting a major military operation was always going to get you into this catch-22. And I think that the smarter approach would have been to recognize we do have a problem in Fallujah. It is probably a problem we should have dealt with 12 months ago. But now at this point in time, we have got to take a combined political and military approach, again, as Dr. Haykel was kind of suggesting in his remarks. BROWN: Let me go back to that, Professor. Who needs to do that? That's clearly not the job of the Marine commander on the ground.

 HAYKEL: No. 

BROWN: Is that the CPA's job? Does the CPA in fact have the resources? Is this the Iraqi Governing Council that has to do that? Because I'm not sure that they have the courage to do that or the support within the country to do that. 

HAYKEL: Well, I think that we have to come at it, you know, with a number -- a combined approach that has to include the regional actors. For instance, Saudi Arabia has been left out of the picture completely, Iran more or less completely. We have a problem with Iran and Syria, because a lot of fighters are coming in across the borders. And more importantly, Fallujah is being used now as a symbol, like Kana was in South Lebanon, as this great sort of point of Islamic resistance to an infidel army. As a public relations campaign, this is a complete victory for al Qaeda. We have Marines in mosques walking around with their shoes and boots and rifles. This will play in the Arab and Muslim street like nothing since, you know, since the invasion of Iraq to begin with. 

 BROWN: Ken, let me give you the last word. This has obviously been -- even -- nobody would describe this month as anything but awful over there from every perspective imaginable. Is there -- do you to see in anything that has gone on any light? Should we be encouraged, for example, that Najaf has not exploded? 

POLLACK: I will say that I think that there were some positive signs, in particular the fact that the majority of the Shiite leaders, Ayatollah Sistani, the other members of the 

(CROSSTALK) 

POLLACK: ... very specifically said to their followers, don't join Muqtada al-Sadr, don't join the uprising. His path is not the best path for us. That's very important to remember. And it is something that we have to capitalize on moving forward. 

BROWN: So at least, in what has been a very difficult month and will end as a very difficult month, the worst since the war, there are small signs in important places that it is not all bad, I guess, huh? 

POLLACK: I think that's right. And it gives me hope that there is still enough of a reservoir of public support for the reconstruction and of hope on the part of Iraq's mainstream leadership that we can build -- rebuild a partnership and move forward. But we absolutely have to take this as a warning sign that if we continue down the same course that we have been following, we're going to continue to alienate Iraqis and these kind of outbreaks in the future are just going to be worse and worse. 

BROWN: Ken, good to see you. Professor, good to have you. Hope you'll come back. 

HAYKEL: Thank you. 

BROWN: Thank you. Maybe May will be better. We can all hope. Thank you. 

HAYKEL: Thank you. 

BROWN: Still to come tonight, a bit of domestic politics, a tight race in Pennsylvania, where an important primary may just be a sign of things to come in the battle for the U.S. Senate. A break first. This is NEWSNIGHT on CNN. 

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

BROWN: Last night, we previewed the Senate Republican primary race in Pennsylvania, one of the most closely watched primary races in the country all year. Senator Arlen Specter, the senior senator in the state, is fighting one of the toughest fights of his political career. And it is coming within his own party, the race widely thought to be a test of the Republican Party's tolerance for moderates within its own ranks. CNN's Joe Johns joins us tonight from Philadelphia. Joe, Good evening. 

JOE JOHNS, CNN CAPITOL HILL CORRESPONDENT: Good evening, Aaron. An old-fashioned brawl here in Pennsylvania. Senator Arlen Specter with 55 percent of the vote in was leading 52-48. We didn't really know what that means. It was expected to be a long evening. Both sides thought they were going to be counting votes late into the night. Senator Specter after the polls closed came out and talked to some of his supporters. 

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP) 

SEN. ARLEN SPECTER (R), PENNSYLVANIA: It has been a very, very difficult campaign, as I know all of you sense. When we have had the kind of an invasion on a number of lines from most importantly the Wall Street financiers who have pumped millions of dollars into the campaign and when we have candidate been to all the church parking lots on Sunday and found so much adverse literature focusing solely on the abortion issue, we have had our hands full. 

(END VIDEO CLIP) 

JOHNS: Now the challenger, of course, is Congressman Pat Toomey. He has spent a lot of his time around Allentown. That of course is his stronghold. He needs big support from the central part of the state, people who are against abortion, against more taxes, and, frankly against Arlen Specter, who many of them believe is simply too liberal. This race has had a lot of impact. It has had a lot of national focus because, of course, it is a swing state, also because the president of the United States has put himself on the line campaigning for the incumbent, Arlen Specter. It is not necessarily because Republicans think Specter is such a fine candidate and they agree with everything he says. They say it is because they're concerned that Pat Toomey might not be able to pull it out in November because, as one person here said, a lot of people stayed on the couches today, but they won't stay on the couches in November, not strong turnout tonight -- Aaron, back to you. 

BROWN: The state is a bit hard to read in some respects. The other senator, Rick Santorum, is quite conservative in the state. So it is not clear that Congressman Toomey would get -- would lose in the fall. It's not clear to me at least. 

JOHNS: No, you're absolutely right. And that's one of the points you to reemphasize here. Senator Santorum has gotten a lot of support. He's very popular here. And he's done quite well. So it is not a foregone conclusion that Pat Toomey will lose. However, a lot of people are expected to come out. And the question, as you know, is swing voters and what will those swing voters do if Pat Toomey is on the ticket. That is probably the bottom line for a lot of folks tonight, Aaron. 

BROWN: Joe, thank you very much -- Joe Johns in Philadelphia reporting for us tonight. Ahead on the program, Fallujah once again. We'll show it to you as it played out overnight in Iraq. A break first. This is NEWSNIGHT. 

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

BROWN: Back to the beginning in Fallujah. No words here, just the sounds of the fight overnight. No experts to kick it around, just the scene as it unfolded. As it plays out, a chance to consider how difficult a month it has been for the U.S. side, which has lost 115 soldiers and Marines, and from the Iraqi side, which has taken some -- we don't really know how many -- civilian deaths as well. 

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE) 

KARL PENHAUL, CNN CORRESPONDENT: What we're seeing now about 800 (INAUDIBLE) or one kilometer south of the Marine position is a bombardment by an AC-130 Spectre gunship. The AC-130 is still overhead. Again, we can see more explosions there. What we can see from here looks like the two positions have been hit. those two positions, possibly 100, 150 yards apart. As I say, no confirmation at this stage from U.S. Marine commanders what those positions may have been. But certainly, the indication that those were insurgent positions. In the distance there, what we've just seen is a fairly large secondary explosion and a small mushroom cloud rising there. Again, this could be another indication that this was some kind of weapons store or an ammunitions store. Certainly that explosion, we don't believe at this stage, was caused by any more coalition strikes on that area. ]We can see now going across in the sky, if you managed to see that, the flash tracer fire. Those tracers are going out from a coalition position, a U.S. Marine position a little ways from where we are standing. It's the same Marine company, Echo Company that we're with. That's the position; they've been sending out the tracer fire there. You probably won't be able to pick these sounds up from our camera microphone, but all the time that these attacks have been going on in the distance, we can hear chants and songs from one of the many mosques in Fallujah. 

(END VIDEOTAPE) 

(COMMERCIAL BREAK) 

(ROOSTER CROWING) 

BROWN: Okeydoke, time to check morning papers from around the country and around the country, because I don't really see any ones that are outside the country today. Kind of an interesting mix between -- no, let me do that differently -- a really interesting mix between local stories and national and international stories on the front pages of the paper.

"The Washington Times," the conservative paper in the Washington, D.C., area, editorially, at least, on the editorial pages, and sometimes I think on the front page, too, but not necessarily today. "Still Bullish." I have no idea -- you can't see that, can you? Can you go down there a little bit. I don't know why they put a bullfight on the front page, but they did. But that's not their lead. "U.S. Planes Rock Fallujah" and a very good picture on the front page as well, also, the Syrian thing, which, honestly, we don't really know much about. "Terrorists Killed in Syrian Attack." 

And that's pretty much the front page of "The Washington Times." One good local story having to do with college athletic directors. I love this story because it raises, like -- it raises all sorts of questions. I started to talk like my daughter for a second, didn't I, like? 

"South Florida Loses Funds For School. Budget Agreement Denies Millions in School Money For Miami-Dade and Broward Counties, Inflicting a Defeat on the Region's Legislators." In this space, two years from now, you'll see, local students not doing as well in school and people will wonder why it is and it might have something to do with that, or perhaps it will not. That's -- thank you. 

That's coming up later. "Philadelphia Inquirer" leads politically. "Toomey, Specter Locked in Tight Race For Senate." We told you about that. And nobody voted. I like that. Well, obviously, some people did. "Despite National Attention, Voter Turnout Was Low." That sometimes happens. Things that we care a lot about, people back there in the home states don't. I hadn't seen this one. This one just kind of snuck up on me. 

"The Oregonian" out there in Portland, Oregon, the Rose City, one of the prettiest cities in the country. "U.S. Presses Attack in Fallujah." We haven't seen this paper in a while. And I'm glad to see it. Also on the front page, they put the vice president's case before the Supreme Court on the front page. It may have been on others, but I haven't seen it. "Justices Seem to See Cheney Side of Talks. Supreme Court Appears to Lean Toward Executive Privilege in Energy Task Force Case." At least that's how "The Oregonian" and "The Washington Post" writer who wrote the story for "The Oregonian" saw it. Ah, one of my favorites, 

"The Burt County Plaindealer" in Burt County, Nebraska. It is a weekly paper. And the big story there is spring. "Stores Stocking Up for Planning" -- planting, that would be, Aaron. Planting. And, also, the gun locks are here, if you're in that town. How we doing on time? Almost done. That would be time to do the weather. In that case, "For shizzle." Beats me. It's the weather in Chicago. I can tell you it is going to be terrific, 74 degrees. Very nice. We'll wrap up the day in just a moment.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK) 

BROWN: Tomorrow, the U.S. Supreme Court hears the Padilla case, the power of the president and an American citizen -- that and much more.We'll see you at 10:00 Eastern time. Until then, good night for all of us. 

TO ORDER A VIDEO OF THIS TRANSCRIPT, PLEASE CALL 800-CNN-NEWS OR USE OUR SECURE ONLINE ORDER FORM LOCATED AT www.fdch.com

Monday, April 26, 2004

Ceasefire in Fallujah, Terrorist Attack Foiled in Jordan

Ceasefire in Fallujah, Terrorist Attack Foiled in Jordan
 

Aired April 26, 2004 - 22:00 ET
 

THIS IS A RUSH TRANSCRIPT. THIS COPY MAY NOT BE IN ITS FINAL FORM AND MAY BE UPDATED.
 

AARON BROWN, CNN ANCHOR: Good evening again.What is it about the war in Vietnam that we can't as a country get over? For a week now we've spent nearly as much time on a war 30 years old as a war going on today.While the candidates went back and forth on this two more Americans died in Iraq. The ceasefire in Fallujah has yet to take hold. There seems no acceptable solution to the problems in Najaf and U.S. soldiers are still unable to get safe Humvees to move from place to place.You might think that would be enough to keep both campaigns in the present but nope. Now neither side, I acknowledge, wants my advice, though I offer it now just the same. Stop it. At best it is a standoff, a tie.The president and the vice president both managed to use the system to avoid service in Vietnam. John Kerry surely said some things after his service there that were too harsh and unfair to most American soldiers fighting the war.We can do this tit-for-tat until November and no one will gain a thing, so our advice let's get on to today.Iraq and the shaky ceasefire begins the program and the whip in the present. CNN's Jane Arraf has the watch, Jane a headline.

JANE ARRAF, CNN BAGHDAD BUREAU CHIEF: Aaron, the Marines give that fragile ceasefire in the volatile city of Fallujah a little more time and south in the holy city of Najaf the U.S. warns an armed militia group to get its weapons out of the mosque.

BROWN: Jane, thank you. We'll get to you at the top tonight.On to the Pentagon and the problem that may not yet have a good solution but needs one badly just the same. Jamie McIntyre, our Senior Pentagon Correspondent with the story, Jamie the headline.

JAMIE MCINTYRE, CNN SR. PENTAGON CORRESPONDENT: Well, Aaron, as the Pentagon is pumping hundreds of millions of dollars into getting new, more heavily armed Humvees to Iraq one of the Pentagon's top generals say even the new, improved Humvees aren't getting the job done.

BROWN: Jamie, thank you. And finally to the campaign and what's shaping up. It was a week for trading haymakers and uppercuts. At ringside CNN's Candy Crowley, Candy a headline.

CANDY CROWLEY, CNN SR. POLITICAL CORRESPONDENT: Aaron, as you know, John Kerry has spent much of his campaign talking about his actions in Vietnam but today the questions and the controversies were about what he did on the homefront.

BROWN: Candy, thank you, back to you and the rest shortly.Also coming up on the program for a Monday night, a terrorist attack foiled in Jordan. Officials say it could have been worse than 9/11, an extraordinary look at the plot and the plotters tonight on NEWSNIGHT.Plus, he is a moderate Republican and he's fighting for his political life. Is Arlen Specter Republican enough for today's conservative Republican voters?And, as always, the rooster will swing by with what you can expect to see on your doorstep or at least in your paper in the morning, all that and more in the hour ahead.We begin tonight in Iraq with the ceasefire in Fallujah. It is in many ways a ceasefire in name only but, for the moment at least, the administration prefers it to the alternative.Late this afternoon the secretary of state said the Marines surrounding Fallujah will hold fast for a while to give joint Iraqi- American patrols a chance to work in the city but anyway you look at it treading lightly hasn't stopped the fighting so far nor the dying.So we begin tonight with CNN's Jane Arraf.

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

ARRAF (voice-over): It doesn't look much like a ceasefire. One coalition soldier died and ten Marines were wounded in a three and a half hour firefight on Monday that killed eight Iraqi fighters in Fallujah officials said. The intense but sporadic firefights though are nothing compared to what could happen if the shaky agreement for the U.S. not to attack first falls through. In the south, the U.S. Army locked in a standoff with the Shia militia group that seized control of Najaf this month is moving into a base camp vacated by Spanish troops withdrawn in a political move by their government.P

HIL KOSNETT, CPA NAJAF REPRESENTATIVE: The Spanish groups are withdrawing and American troops are moving in to maintain a presence in the bases and to demonstrate to the people of Najaf that we have not forgotten them.ARRAF: The Army is careful not to go into Najaf itself but a senior military official said across the river from Najaf and Kufa Monday night the Army was attacking forces from Muqtada al-Sadr's militia. The military has warned insurgents to remove stockpiles of weapons they say are located in schools, shrines and mosques.And, in Baghdad, an explosion at a suspected chemical arms factory killed two U.S. soldiers and wounded five others. The blast leveled part of the building as U.S. troops searched it setting military vehicles on fire. A group of Iraqis cheered that the vehicles burned.

(END VIDEOTAPE)

ARRAF: The city is just waking up with a lot of people worried about what the day will bring. Now the vast majority of Iraqis long for a good night's sleep and an end to the violence but a small but effective minority are supporting these attacks and coalition officials say effectively keeping the rest of the country hostage -- Aaron.BROWN: Just as best you can guess and when you're looking at a situation like Najaf, what sort of support within the city does the -- do the Americans have or does the coalition have there?

ARRAF: Najaf is such a fascinating and difficult example of the challenge that the Americans are facing here. It's a holy city, one of the holiest in the world. It's the holiest in the world for Shias and it has a variety of Shia leaders there.Now the man who is in control, we have to remember, is a very young and by most accounts radical cleric who effectively has held that city hostage. A lot of people, we're told, would like to see him gone. They can't open their shops. The pilgrims aren't coming. They're worried about increasing violence. They're terribly worried about the U.S. going in but they're also worried about what will happen if the U.S. does come in and there is fighting in the streets of this holy city.So, a lot of people while they don't want to see the Americans in the city of Najaf they don't want to see Muqtada al-Sadr either. It's so far a stalemate -- Aaron.

BROWN: Jane, thank you, Jane Arraf in Baghdad this morning for her now.To the problem of protecting soldiers and Marines as they go about their job. On the one hand, the Americans need to be out there on patrol dealing with security. On the other hand, every time they do go out there they are at risk.Right now a company in Ohio was working literally around the clock, three shifts a day, refitting Humvees with armor plating to make the soldiers they carry safer but today an Army general says the fix may not really fix anything.Again, our Senior Pentagon Correspondent Jamie McIntyre.

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

MCINTYRE (voice-over): With U.S. troops still dying in deadly roadside attacks, the Pentagon is spending $400 million racing to replace the Army's basic thin-skinned Humvees with reinforced up- armored versions. But the better armor is still not providing adequate protection, writes a four-star general in a memo obtained by CNN."Commanders in the field are reporting to me that the up-armored Humvee is not providing the solution the Army hoped to achieve," writes General Larry Ellis, Commanding General of the U.S. Army Forces Command in a March 30th memo to the Army chief of staff.Critics say even with better armor, the Humvee's shoulder-level doors make it too easy to lob a grenade inside. Its four rubber tires burn too readily. At two tons it's light enough to be overturned by a mob.General Ellis wants to shift Army funds to build twice as many of the Army's newest combat vehicle, the Striker, which has eight wheels, weighs 19 tons and when equipped with a special cage can withstand an RPG attack.

BRIG. GEN. DAVID GRANGE, MILITARY ANALYST: The Striker is going to take too long to produce that many, so I'd get something out there now during this very intense period in Iraq.

MCINTYRE: Critics like General Grange say the Army is overlooking an even cheaper, faster solution than the $3 million Striker, thousands of Vietnam Era M113 armored personnel carriers that the Army has in storage and which can be upgraded with new armor for less than $100,000 a piece.

(END VIDEOTAPE)

MCINTYRE: In his memo to the Army chief, General Ellis pleads for quick action and expresses some frustration, saying that while the nation is at war some of the Army seem to be in a peacetime posture -- Aaron.

BROWN: Jamie, thank you, Jamie McIntyre at the Pentagon tonight.The best defense is a good offense they say and the Bush campaign seems to be buying. On a week when the president and vice president will go before the 9/11 commission, on a week when the Supreme Court will hear a case to open the records of the vice president's energy task force and, on a week that will end on May 1st, the anniversary of the president's speech declaring major combat over in Iraq, the vice president took to the stump today to say John Kerry's judgment on national security is questionable.He also made light of the Senator's claim that he enjoys the support of many foreign leaders where Iraq is concerned.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP) 

DICK CHENEY, VICE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES: Senator Kerry said that he has met with foreign leaders, and I quote "who can't go out and say this publicly but boy they look at you and say you've got to win this. You've got to beat this guy. We need a new policy, things like that." In any case, come November, the outcome of the election will be determined by the voters of the United States not by unnamed foreign leaders.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

BROWN: Senator Kerry, meanwhile, was dealing with other comments, comments made long ago that will not go away.Here again, CNN's Candy Crowley.

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

CROWLEY (voice-over): Hit hard by job drain, West Virginia could be fertile ground for John Kerry's economic pitch but Monday the Senator was going over old ground.

SEN. JOHN KERRY (D), PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE: It has nothing to do with this election whatsoever and if these guys want to argue about Vietnam 35 years ago let's go do it.

CROWLEY: 1971, Washington, D.C., Kerry a decorated Vietnam Vet is part of a weeklong protest culminating with vets tossing their medals over a capital fence.

KERRY: In a real sense, this administration forced us to return our medals.

CROWLEY: In fact, Kerry returned his ribbons not his medals.

KERRY: I didn't have them with me. It was very simple and I threw some medals back that belonged to some folks who asked me to throw them back for them.

CROWLEY: It took several years for that to become clear but the Senator says he never misled anyone into thinking differently. And then the "New York Times" and ABC found this, an interview Kerry gave to local Washington station WRC shortly after the protest.

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: How many did you give back, John?

KERRY: I gave back, I can't remember, six, seven, eight, nine.

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: Well, you were awarded the Bronze Star, a Silver Star and three Purple Hearts.

KERRY: Well, and above that I gave back my others.

CROWLEY: Faced with the newly-discovered tape, Kerry shoved back.

KERRY: This is a complete distraction by the Bush administration. It's their attack method. This is what they do and it's coming from a president who can't even prove that he actually showed up for duty in the National Guard.

CROWLEY: It is the news media looking through the Kerry records but Republicans are happy to stoke whatever is there.

KAREN HUGHES, ADVISER TO PRESIDENT BUSH: Now I can understand if out of conscience you take a principled stand and you would decide that you were so opposed to this that you would actually throw your medals but to pretend to do so, I think that's very revealing.

CROWLEY: Kerry now says he never made any distinction between medals and ribbons and returning one is the same as the other.

(END VIDEOTAPE)

CROWLEY: Kerry's critics say this has nothing to do with ribbons or medals and everything to do with the character of a man they say does one thing and says another, which as you know, Aaron, is exactly what the Kerry campaign says about the president.

BROWN: Just one very quick question. Have you in all the time you've been out on the campaign heard a single voter ask a single question about this topic?

CROWLEY: I've heard a single voter -- I rarely hear voters talk about a lot of the things that we talk about.

BROWN: Yes.

CROWLEY: Generally it's about the economy and the war. Those are the two things you hear out on the campaign trail.

BROWN: I suspect so. Thank you, Candy, Candy Crowley tonight.We've long believed, as you know, in the power of the unscripted moment. If nothing else, it is the power to fascinate. Nearly four years ago that moment came when candidates George Bush and Dick Cheney were talking about a certain major league reporter for the "New York Times."Today, Senator Kerry had some choice words for his interviewers while unplugging from his pretty tough appearance this morning on "Good Morning America." The tape was rolling. The microphone was hot.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

KERRY: Yes, they're doing the work of the Republican National Committee.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

BROWN: Well, I suspect Charlie Gibson would take some exception to that. It is a somewhat strange set of circumstances that 33-year- old questions are being asked of a candidate who volunteered to go to Vietnam and served with distinction however briefly. How can that be, we wondered? And, as we often do when we wonder, we asked Jeff Greenfield for his thoughts.

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

ANNOUNCER: The decisions that he made saved our lives.

JEFF GREENFIELD, CNN SR. ANALYST (voice-over): It was a key to John Kerry's success in the primaries, ads that fused past bravery in Vietnam with current conviction and compassion. Indeed it was his Vietnam record...

KERRY: Men who encouraged body counts.GREENFIELD: And his striking 1971 denunciation of the war before a Senate committee that formed the basis of his entire political career. So, how is it possible that Kerry now finds himself facing such tough questions about what he said and did during the Vietnam Era?In large measure it's because these questions aren't really about Vietnam at all but about the battles the United States is fighting now, as well as about the kind of public person John Kerry is.Take the whole question about what Kerry said back in 1971 about Americans who committed atrocities, perhaps war crimes, in Vietnam, language Kerry says he now regrets.

KERRY: The words were honest but, on the other hand, they were a little bit over the top.

HUGHES: Senator Kerry and Vietnam...

GREENFIELD: When top Bush adviser Karen Hughes attacks such comments, she's really asking voters to view them through the prism of today when Americans are in harm's way in Iraq and in Afghanistan.What Kerry's critics now want those words to imply is that he is somehow disdainful of today's troops. That's an impression the Bush campaign means to drive home with a series of ads attacking his votes against weapons systems and defense spending.

CHARLIE GIBSON, ANCHOR, "GOOD MORNING AMERICA": I saw you throw medals over the fence and we didn't find out until later that those were...

KERRY: No, you didn't see me throw...

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: ...those were someone else's members.

KERRY: Wrong, Charlie.

GREENFIELD: Or look at the new controversy over just what Kerry did during a 1971 demonstration whether he ever claimed he threw his medals back or just his ribbons. The word for word parsing of Kerry's 33-year-old comments may seem like a stretch but they go to the heart of the Bush campaign theme that their man is a steady leader while Kerry says different things on different days. It's why this comment from Kerry keeps showing up in Bush's commercials.

KERRY: I actually did vote for the $87 billion before I voted against it.

GREENFIELD (on camera): Now there is some risk here for the Bush campaign. For instance, the effort to throw doubt on one of Kerry's three Purple Hearts wound up reaffirming his record of bravery and all but one of his crewmates back his military service and indeed back his bid for the presidency.But it is the post combat record of John Kerry during those Vietnam years that his foes now believe can be used to undermine both his personal and political appeal.Jeff Greenfield, CNN, New York.

(END VIDEOTAPE)

BROWN: Still on NEWSNIGHT tonight getting the news out of Iraq never easy when you're in an unstable country getting harder by the day. We'll talk to three reporters who are just back.Also coming up...

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

KERRY: I came here to undertake one last mission to search out and to destroy the last vestige of this barbaric war.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

BROWN: More tonight on John Kerry the antiwar activist and how those days are back again.From New York this is NEWSNIGHT.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

BROWN: Journalists, the cliche goes, write the first draft of history. The first drafts by their very nature are imperfect. In war zones, that first swipe at history comes with a good dose of danger. The danger often limiting access to the story making the fog of war a good deal thicker.Iraq has never been an easy place to report from but the past few weeks have been especially hard for all reporters, television and print, who are working there. Our guests tonight know that firsthand.Brian Bennett is "Time" magazine's Bureau Chief in Baghdad. Colin McMahon reports for "The Chicago Tribune," and Jeff Gettleman does the same for the "New York Times," and it's good to have them all safe and with us tonight.Brian, let me start with you. How in a month or in six weeks has it changed?

BRIAN BENNETT, "TIME" MAGAZINE, BAGHDAD BUREAU CHIEF: It's changed dramatically just in the last four or five weeks since the uprising of Sadr and the events in Fallujah. It's been very, very difficult to travel on the roads outside of Baghdad. Most journalists I've spoken with have been -- we had a very difficult time traveling along the roads out to Fallujah and even down to Najaf to cover the story there.I just returned about a week ago from Baghdad and over the last two weeks that I was there I only traveled once out of the city of Baghdad and that was to go down to Najaf and try to do some reporting there on Muqtada al-Sadr and his militia.

BROWN: Jeffrey, how is your -- how is it different from you? You actually have been getting out there a fair amount. Are you editors all together pleased with how much you've been getting out there?

JEFFREY GETTLEMAN, "NEW YORK TIMES" CORRESPONDENT: Well, the risks have really gone up. I was in Fallujah about two weeks ago and then I was there with the Marines as an embed and that allowed me access to the city that I wouldn't have otherwise been able to get.But Brian is absolutely right. It's the roads that are most dangerous. That's where we've had a number of kidnappings, a number of shootings, and one of the real conundrums of covering this is sort of what approach to take. Should you be very conspicuous and well protected and well armed, not as a journalist individually armed but maybe travel with armed guards in an armed car that sort of stands out like a sore thumb? Or, should you travel inconspicuously in an unarmored car and try to blend in but, if anything happens, then you're in big trouble?

BROWN: Is it possible for someone light-skinned to blend in?

GETTLEMAN: Well, you could blend in. You could try to blend in a little bit.

BROWN: OK.

GETTLEMAN: By the way you dress or just by traveling, let's say, in a beat up taxi or a plain Mercedes as opposed to a big SUV. That's sort of a signature car for any foreigner there.

BROWN: Colin does it -- what kind of stories aren't getting covered because of this? Obviously we're getting coverage from the embeds in places. We're getting the war covered. Are we missing the sidebars to the overall story?

COLIN MCMAHON, "CHICAGO TRIBUNE" FOREIGN CORRESPONDENT: I think the big story, I mean the big story that's not covered right now is just kind of what havoc and what destruction and what kind of casualties were in Fallujah.And I don't think that that's a story that you can do unless you're there and you're talking to people and you're seeing the numbers that come from various sources. Because you've got on one side, you know, you've got on one side the hospital people. You've got on the other side the Marines.

BROWN: This is the other side of the lines kind of reporting, how many Iraqi casualties have there been?

MCMAHON: Exactly and you can kind of put together bits and pieces depending on what you get from the television stations, the Arab television stations that are talking to the doctors in the city. You can try to mesh those with what the Marines are saying but to get a real clear picture that's impossible unless you're there.

BROWN: Is anybody really trying to go out and do the sewer project story, the school story, the sort of more upbeat story? Is it worth -- are those stories seen as worth the risk?

MCMAHON: Yes, I think that, you know, that's the kind of story that you do when you're working on other things. You're working on daily and you have time during the day to do those little, nice little features or those little quick hits that tell you something about the place but when there's so much news and there's so much risk to doing that kind of story you just don't even have time or the inclination to do it.

BROWN: Brian, are you delegating some reporting out to local staff?

BENNETT: Yes, we have. Just in the last couple of weeks we've done something different in Iraq in order to get into some of the neighborhoods that are considered too dangerous for foreigners to travel to. We've delegated some of the reporting to our local staff and trained them to get all the necessary information that we need and bring it back so that we can get some reporting inside Sadr City, for example, inside Najaf, places where during certain times over the last few weeks it's just been too dangerous for someone with a foreign passport to travel.

BROWN: I think every reporter at some point in their life has felt safe simply because they're reporters and that who would harm a reporter? We just want to tell your story. Obviously reporters and every other American there does not feel safe. Is it an anti-American thing? Are they anti-media? What is it?

BENNETT: Well, I think there's a strong rumor right now that a lot of the reporters are spies and working for foreign companies and working for foreign governments and certainly in Fallujah it seems like when reporters have been kidnapped and detained around Fallujah and in Najaf once the insurgents were convinced that the reporters were not spies, were actually just trying to get the story they let them go. 

BROWN: Jeffrey.

MCMAHON: It also depends on, I think it also depends on the group that's taking you. I mean I think that part of what's so difficult for anybody who has been in a situation where there's kidnappings and there's abductions is that you -- sometimes that you have one group that's doing it and you can kind of figure out where they're coming from.

BROWN: Yes.

MCMAHON: But then all of a sudden other groups get involved and then the whole thing becomes so impossible to predict.

BROWN: Just, we've got about 90 seconds left. Jeffrey, talk to me a bit about when you were embedded with the Marines in Fallujah. This is really, this is the urban combat. What was it like?

GETTLEMAN: It was incredibly intense. It was like a replay of a war movie. It was something that I was not prepared for at all. There's actually a front line where the Marines have dug into a number of houses and established positions and there's constant firefights between them and insurgents and they're perched over the roof aiming down with their guns shooting back and forth.We were there one day and a mortar shell sailed over our heads about that far over our heads and these guys just kind of like, you know, wiped the sweat off their forehead and jumped right back into it. I mean it's really intense.

BROWN: Do you ever say to yourself what am I doing here?

GETTLEMAN: Almost all the time.

BROWN: Welcome home.

GETTLEMAN: Thanks, Aaron.BROWN: You've done terrific work as you all have.

GETTLEMAN: Thanks.

BROWN: Thanks for being with us tonight. We look forward to talking to you all again. Thank you very, very much.Ahead on the program tonight, terrorism foiled in Jordan, how the secret police got their man, confession on tape, a break first.Around the world this is NEWSNIGHT.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

BROWN: When Jordan's secret police broke up an al Qaeda attack in the making last week they were met with a certain degree of public skepticism. The plot, they said, targeted Jordanians and Americans and involved makeshift chemical weapons. We know this because the secret police, who are very good at what they do and sometimes pretty ruthless about it, managed to get the alleged plotters to confess and the government to answer the skeptics ran those confessions on state TV.Here's CNN's John Vause

.(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE) 

JOHN VAUSE, CNN CORRESPONDENT (voice-over): A nighttime raid in a back street of Amman, Jordanian special forces heavily armed move in on what they say is a terrorist cell possibly just days away from an attack. Authorities here claim the suspects were plotting to use thousands of pounds of chemicals and explosives in an attack which the government says was potentially more deadly than anything al Qaeda has done before, including 9/11. Inside, four men shot dead, at least three others arrested, including Azmi Jayousi, the cell's alleged ringleader. Jordanian intelligence told CNN he was responsible for planning and recruiting. On state-run Jordanian television, he made an extraordinary confession, admitting he took orders from Abu Musab al- Zarqawi, a terrorist leader who has been linked to al Qaeda, the same man U.S. officials say is behind some of the terrorist attacks in Iraq. 

AZMI AL-JAYOUSI, ACCUSED PLOTTER (through translator): I took advanced explosives course, poisons, high level, then I pledged allegiance to Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, to obey him without any questioning.

VAUSE: Jordanian intelligence believes Jayousi returned from Iraq in January after meeting with Zarqawi. There, it is alleged they plotted to hit three targets in Amman, Jordanian intelligence headquarters, the prime minister's office and the U.S. Embassy. In a series of raids, the Jordanians say they seized 20 tons of chemicals and explosives, three trucks equipped with specially modified plows, apparently designed to crash through security barricades. Their first alleged target, the intelligence headquarters. 

JAYOUSI (through translator): According to my experience as an explosives expert, the whole of the intelligence department will be destroyed and nothing will remain of it, nor anything surrounding it. 

VAUSE: All of the details of plot played out on Jordanian television Monday, including detailed graphics of how Jayousi's cell said it intended to carry out the attack. Hussein Sharif says he was recruited by Azmi Jayousi as a suicide bomber. 

HUSSEIN SHARIF, ACCUSED PLOTTER (through translator): The aim of this operation was to strike Jordan and the Hashemite royal family, a war against the crusaders and infidels. Azmi told me that this would be the first chemical suicide attack that al Qaeda would execute. 

VAUSE: According to Jordanian authorities, the attack would have mixed 71 lethal chemicals, a combination which they say has never been used before, including blistering agents to cause third-degree burns, nerve gas and choking agents. 

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: It is a very, extremely, massive core attack. 

VAUSE: This man can't be identified for security reasons. He's the government's scientist who analyzed the mix of explosives and chemicals. 

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: There made maybe 100 of experiments until they got the right amount of explosive to do just the shattering effect to spread these chemical around without affecting the agents. 

VAUSE (on camera): In other words, the blast would not burn up the poisonous chemicals, instead, produce a toxic cloud, the government says, possibly spreading a mile, maybe more. (voice-over): The Jordanian intelligence buildings are within a mile of a large medical center, shopping mall and residential area, all a potential dead zone, according to this government scientist. 

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: There is no one combination of antidote to treat nerve agents, choking agents, and blistering agents. VAUSE: Zarqawi, a Jordanian national, has been accused of plotting chemical attacks before and authorities say this is not his first attempt to strike Jordan. In 2000, a Jordanian court charged him in absentia with planning to blow up this hotel and attacks on tourist destinations. The U.S. believes he was behind the assassination of American diplomat Laurence Foley. 

ASMA KHADER, JORDANIAN MINISTER OF STATE: Jordan was fighting these type of plans years now. And the security forces were able to confirm them. 

VAUSE: According to the televised confessions, $170,000 came from Zarqawi via messengers from Syria. In last Tuesday's raid, Jordanians seized cash, bomb-making equipment and weapons. It was during that raid that the Jordanians say Jayousi was injured. On TV, he was only shown in profile and appeared to have marks on his face, neck and hand. (on camera): CNN was not given access to any of those arrested, but the videotape confessions offer a rare insight into an alleged terrorist operation. A Jordanian government says the videotapes were made with the cooperation of the suspects and their lawyers. Meantime, here in Amman, U.S. officials have been meeting with their Jordanian counterparts to assess the evidence and they say the plot did pose a serious and grave threat. John Vause, CNN, Amman, Jordan. 

(END VIDEOTAPE) 

BROWN: Still to come on NEWSNIGHT, a so-called Republican dinosaur fighting for his political life in Pennsylvania. Does the moderate wing of the party still have a place in the party? A break first. From New York, this is NEWSNIGHT.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK) 

BROWN: Every family has its power struggles. This is especially true it seems in politics. In Pennsylvania, Republican voters go to the polls tomorrow in what has become one of the most closely watched Republican primary races in the country in years. It is widely seen as a test of a revolt within the party. And its outcome will have ramifications either way. Here is CNN's Joe Johns. 

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE) 

REP. PAT TOOMEY (R-PA), SENATORIAL CANDIDATE: Believe it or not, she does support me. 

(LAUGHTER) 

 JOE JOHNS, CNN CAPITOL HILL CORRESPONDENT (voice-over): The conservative right and Congressman Pat Toomey have turned this Senate race into a test of whether moderate Republicans like Arlen Specter still have a place in the party. S

EN. ARLEN SPECTER (R), PENNSYLVANIA: They said they want my scalp on the wall, nailed to the wall, just that rude and that crude. 

TOOMEY: I believe that all the energy and enthusiasm and passion is on our side of this race. 

JOHNS: Both candidates spent this stormy day flying around the state trying to motivate their voters in what is expected to be a low- turnout primary. Toomey, who has campaigned with prominent anti- abortion activists like James Dobson of Focus on the Family, is counting on strong support from the right-to-life movement. Specter, who supports abortion rights, says, if Toomey wins the primary, Republicans will lose the seat in the fall and could lose control of a closely divided Senate. 

SPECTER: My opponent is a surefire loser. 

JOHNS: The president is worried, too, because he needs this all- important swing state for his own reelection. Mr. Bush is prominently featured in a new Specter ad. 

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP, AD) 

GEORGE W. BUSH, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES: Arlen Specter is the right man for the United States Senate. 

(END VIDEO CLIP) 

TOOMEY: President Bush was in Pennsylvania campaigning for Arlen Specter. Now, here is what I think. I think everyone is entitled to make a mistake. 

(LAUGHTER) 

TOOMEY: Everybody. 

JOHNS: A new poll shows Toomey within striking distance of knocking off Specter. And one key group of supporters, the Conservative Club For Growth, has poured in more than $1 million to help him. 

STEPHEN MOORE, PRESIDENT, CLUB FOR GROWTH: If you look at the record of Arlen Specter, he's really the last of a kind of Republican dinosaur. 

JOHNS (on camera): But even with all the national attention, political observers expect only one-third of the state's registered Republicans to vote. Joe Johns, CNN, Allentown, Pennsylvania. 

(END VIDEOTAPE) 

BROWN: Ahead on NEWSNIGHT tonight, back then, he was an anti-war activist. Today, he's running for president, how what John Kerry said then is affecting the now. A break first. This is NEWSNIGHT. 

(COMMERCIAL BREAK) 

BROWN: We will concede if pressed the program has a certain schizophrenic quality tonight. We began decrying this tit-for-tat over Vietnam and since have run two pieces centered on it and are about to run a third, proving yet again we don't make the news, we just report it. And since the news in part seems to center on John Kerry's anti-war activities, we take a look at them now in some detail and in context. And here's part of the context. Before John Kerry began his protest against the war, he fought that war. There are people alive today who wouldn't have been if he had acted differently in that war. It is just one of the things worth remembering when looking at everything that happened after. 

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

BROWN (voice-over): John Kerry came home from Vietnam with a chest full of medals and a growing sense the war was wrong. 

GEORGE BUTLER, FRIEND OF JOHN KERRY: John's evolution was fairly gradual and it was very deliberative. He asked a lot of questions. 

BROWN: Filmmaker and photographer George Butler has been friends with Kerry since the mid '60s and documented this period in Kerry's life. 

BUTLER: The veterans, not just John Kerry, but thousands of them, saying that war is a major mistake and it has got to be ended. 

BROWN: In 1970, Kerry asked to be discharged so he could run for Congress in Massachusetts. He ran as a peace candidate and he lost. And by the next year, Kerry was a leader of the Vietnam Veterans Against the War. 

KERRY: We came here to undertake one last mission, to search out and to destroy the last vestige of this barbaric war. 

BROWN: His experience and education and his passion made him a star of the anti-war movement. 

KERRY: What we have to decide is that we're going to keep coming back until this war ends.

 UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Yes!

(CHEERING AND APPLAUSE) 

BROWN: Kerry alone was invited to testify before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. 

BUTLER: It was packed with veterans, with members of the press and this wall of television cameras. 

BROWN: Kerry memorably asked the senators, "How do you ask a man to be the last man to die for a mistake?" He questioned the military's tactics and the president's motivation. 

KERRY: We watched while men charged up hills because a general said that hill has to be taken and after losing one platoon or two platoons, they marched away to leave the hill for the reoccupation of the North Vietnamese, because we watched pride allow the most unimportant of battles to be blown into extravaganzas, because we couldn't lose and we couldn't retreat and because it didn't matter how many American bodies were lost to prove that point. 

BROWN: But the most controversy was generated when Kerry publicized the dark notion of some American soldiers raping and randomly shooting civilians, decapitating the enemy, poisoning food stock, atrocities that he never saw. 

MACKUBIN OWENS, VIETNAM VETERAN: He cast dispersions on the rest of us. 

BROWN: Naval War College instructor Mack Owens led a Marine platoon in Vietnam the same year Kerry commanded his swift boat. 

OWENS: We all know that atrocities happened in Vietnam. But to claim as Kerry did and some of the people that he operated with that these were a normal occurrence day to day, accepted as part of policy, that offended me, and it enraged me, as a matter of fact.BROWN: Thirty-three years later, now a candidate for president, John Kerry apologized a bit. 

KERRY: Look, I think American soldiers served with unbelievable distinction and courage. I'm proud of them. And I regret words that I may have used that were words that were sort of, you know, very angry and reflected the feelings that we had about the war. But they were honest. They were honest expressions of the passion that we brought to the cause. 


BROWN: In what was perhaps the most anguished moment of the 1971 protests in Washington, some soldiers threw away their medals. Kerry, his own medals at home, tossed ribbons that he had worn before the Senate and tossed the medals of soldiers who couldn't be there. 

KERRY: We wanted to say to America, you've got to stop and think about what is happening over here. And it is not just kids at college who think this thing is wrong. It is also some of us who served there. And we want you to know that this is how strongly we feel about it. 

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: I think that John Kerry is contrary to everything that I stand for and my country stands for. 

BROWN: Even 33 years later, some veterans cannot forgive John Kerry for his words and for his protests. 

OWENS: I thought that what we had undertaken there was the right thing to do. I think it was a noble cause. It was an attempt to ensure that a part of the world did not come under the control of communism. 

BROWN: The crew that stood with Kerry in the war defends his actions protesting it. 

MICHAEL MEDIEROS, VIETNAM VETERAN: A lot of people would have just said, well, I'm not going to jeopardize my reputation. I'm going to go into politics. I don't want anybody to use this against me. I'll just let it lie and I won't make any waves. He didn't do that. At the time, I thought it was wrong. Now I realize that was probably the most courageous thing he could do. 

DEL SANDUSKY, VIETNAM VETERAN: History has proven John Kerry right. Whether they agreed with him or not in '70 or '71, we shouldn't have been in that war. What John Kerry said was true. 

(END VIDEOTAPE) 

BROWN: That's Kerry the anti-war activist. There is also the story of Kerry the sailor. And we'll tell that story this week as well. Morning papers coming up. 

(COMMERCIAL BREAK) 

(ROOSTER CROWING) 

BROWN: Okeydokey, time to check morning papers from around the country and around the world. If you were with us Friday, you know the crew acted up a bit. But we fired them all, so that wouldn't be happening again. No, we didn't. You knew that, right? 

"Christian Science Monitor" starts us off. This is an interesting off-news lead, I would say. Well -- yes. "Democracy Spreads Across Africa 10 Years After Apartheid. Political Freedom Faces New Pressures." It certainly does. Anyway, it's bylined out of Johannesburg, South Africa. 

And also on the middle of the front page of "The Christian Science Monitor," give me a shot, "Sadr the Agitator, Like Father, Like Son," a look at the young cleric who is causing so much trouble. And also they put the vice president's Supreme Court case on the front page. "In Cheney Case, Court Reviews Executive Power." More on that tomorrow. 

"The Washington Times" leads with Iraq, "Baghdad Blast Kills Two Soldiers," but runs pretty hard with politics on the front page, given that we are in April. "Cheney Criticizes Kerry for Anti-Military Votes. Democrats Rip Cheney's Record, Tie Wife's Pregnancy to Vietnam." I guess it's that they got pregnant so he could avoid going to Vietnam. He had used a lot of student deferments and other things and said it wasn't a priority.Anyway, they put a lot -- also, "Kerry Hits Back on Medals, Calls it a Phony Controversy." Let's get on with today, guys. "Philadelphia Inquirer," speaking of today, which in this case is tomorrow: "Specter-Toomey Race Goes to the Voters. Stakes High in Senate Primary." 

This is "The Philadelphia Inquirer." Leads with that. And is there anything else here? "Air Friendly Paint Soon in the Can." I don't know what that means, but I just like the headline. That's all.

"Chattanooga Times Free Press," a lot of local stories leading newspapers, which I always like. It makes the segment a little bit more fun. And we appreciate when editors make the segment more fun. 

"City's Blue Law Up For a Vote. County to Address Ordinance Keeping Stores Closed 12 Hours On Sunday." I didn't realize honestly there were many blue laws left in the country. I remember when they were everywhere. Also down here, can you get a shot of that? That's the new Iraqi flag. Can you see that? And it's caused a bit of a furor because it is largely the same colors as the Israeli flag, which makes for some unease in that part of the world. How are we doing on time? Thirty? Oh, my goodness. That's OK. We can live with that. 

"The Dayton Daily News" leads with "Iraq, Soldiers Killed in Baghdad, Marine Dies In Fallujah." Over here, "Violent Girls Alarm Society." We were talking about this today, maybe want to do a story on this. But there is some evidence that girls are acting more like boys, I think is what it comes down to. We should probably save this for tomorrow, "The Burt County Plaindealer," shouldn't we? 

I think so.So let's go right on to "The Chicago Sun-Times." "Rosemont Casino Faces New Delay." This story seems to be on the front page about every two weeks. But here is the one we care about. "We'd Know Our Friends By Any Name." This is the countdown to the final episode of "Friends." I have yet to see one. The weather in Chicago, "hat- flapper." 

(CHIMES)

BROWN: Thank you for that. That's "The "Chicago Sun-Times." That's morning papers. We'll wrap up the day in a moment.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK) 

BROWN: Before we leave you for the night, one more bit of business. Here is Bill Hemmer with a look at what's coming up tomorrow on "AMERICAN MORNING."

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP) 

BILL HEMMER, CNN ANCHOR: Aaron, thanks.Tomorrow here on "AMERICAN MORNING," Senator John Kerry has been called a Vietnam War hero. But, suddenly, his war record is called into question. Can Republicans use it against him? And what about those lingering questions about that Purple Heart and other war medals? We'll talk to DNC Chairman Terry McAuliffe about all these matters and the president's new campaign ads as well, tomorrow morning, 7:00 a.m. Eastern time on "AMERICAN MORNING." Hope to see you then -- Aaron. 

(END VIDEO CLIP) 

BROWN: Vietnam still.That's our report for tonight. "LOU DOBBS TONIGHT" next for most of you. We're all back here tomorrow, 10:00 Eastern time. We hope you'll join us then. Until then, good night for all of us at NEWSNIGHT. 

TO ORDER A VIDEO OF THIS TRANSCRIPT, PLEASE CALL 800-CNN-NEWS OR USE OUR SECURE ONLINE ORDER FORM LOCATED AT www.fdch.com