This was a list I started, after a time it became easy to spot any fraud. To prove how unsuccessful Sharon's Campaign for fraud was the current participants are far, far few than listed here. At one time it was a wide array of newsprint and an enjoyable segment. Now, it's all 'tilted bigotry' to serve the propaganda of the Neocons who favor war over peace.
San Francisco Chronicle
http://www.sfgate.com/
Philadelphia Inquirer
http://www.philly.com/mld/inquirer/
Boston Herald
http://news.bostonherald.com/
The Boston Globe
http://www.boston.com/
The Washington Post
http://www.washingtonpost.com/
The Press of Atlantic City
Detroit Free Press
Washington Times
Oregonian
Chattanooga Times Free Press
Times Herald Record
Times of London
Dallas Morning News
Richmond Times Dispatch
San Antonio Press
Atlanta Journal Constitution
The Washington Times
Amelia Bulletin Monitor
Sun Sentinel
Chicago Sun Times
The Guardian
The China Daily
The Detroit News
International Herald Tribune
The South Bend Tribune
The Miami Herald
The Cincinnati Enquirer
Chattanooga Sun Times
Philadelphia Daily News
The Birmingham News
San Antonio Express News
St. Paul Dispatch
Washington Daily News – The Voice of the Pamlico
The Herald Sun – Raleigh, Durham, Reasearch Triangle
The New Zealand Herald
The News Print still remaining as a part of this segment from the above list are:
Philadelphia Inquirer
Boston Herald
Detroit Free Press
Washington Times
Oregonian
Chattanooga Times Free Press
Times Herald Record
Times of London
Dallas Morning News
Richmond Times Dispatch
San Antonio Press
Atlanta Journal Constitution
The Guardian
The Detroit News
The International Herald Tribune
The Miami Herald
The Cincinnati Enquirer
Chattanooga Sun Times
San Antonio Express NewsODD THOUGH. I never monitored The Christian Science Monitor because I never considered and still don't consider them legitimate newsprint. Even when they were the ONLY reporters within Najaf when all the conflict was being stirred up by Bush over al Sadr, their reporting was discriminatory in favor to White Neocons. They reported 'the fighters' of Najaf as unsophisticated and the people that backed them did so out of loyalty. You know when you consider the level of unsophisticated fighters loyal to 'al Sadr' one would expect the USA to stop their assault realizing any further combat would be nothing more than a slaughter. But, it was like the reporters from The Chrisitan Science Monitor was giving the USA clues to the ease at which the battle could be won. None of the towns of Iraq are so well equipped they deserve the kind of wrath they receive from the USA. They are unsophisticated. Bush did this. He forced them to continue the fight because he has no 'savvy' to do otherwise. If the Sunnis weren't forced from the current government because of the unnecesssary and unsuccessful attack on Fallujah there would be far less oppostion today. Allawi is more trouble than solution. He needs to step down from Prime Minister. He allowed the attacks to proceed against his own people. He shouldn't have done that.
