WEDNESDAY, APR 17, 2013 06:31 PM EDT
The former CNN anchor tells Salon about the "tremendous pressure" in the "inherently conservative" net's newsroom (click here)
After CNN was forced to walk back John King’s reporting that an arrest had been made in connection to the Boston Marathon bombing, Aaron Brown (an anchor at CNN until 2005, including on the morning of Sept. 11, 2001) was sympathetic.
“No one who does this in a breaking news environment has not had this happen. You feel that you’ve let down the organization and the audience. It is a very difficult moment.”
Brown, who is now a professor at Arizona State University, told Salon that his students had asked about the King reporting throughout the day. “I told them it never would have happened this badly on my watch,” he joked, before turning serious. “The role of the anchor is to say: This is true. And these things are very chaotic. [CNN should have indicated] ‘What we can say for sure is that the case moved significantly today.” Brown suggested that King and NBC News’ Pete Williams were using sources from entirely different spheres, with Williams operating with federal sources in Washington, while “my guess is that [King] was getting stuff from local or law enforcement or courthouse people; his sources were state people.”
The former CNN reporter indicated that an issue of reputation and stature helped get King’s reporting on the air. “There is tremendous pressure, even though CNN is inherently conservative in its news judgment,” Brown said. “It was one of the most trusted reporters in the organization and in the news business. Did the executive producer make the call? Absolutely. Was the anchor involved? Probably not.”
Daniel D'Addario is a staff reporter for Salon's entertainment section. Follow him on Twitter @DPD_