Wednesday, January 26, 2005

The Religious Bigotry of Sharon von Zwieten, but, feeling justified.

This is an interesting set of papers. The Christian Science Monitor isn't included. But that is because the Christian theme is played throughout the programming. Title of this evenings program: "Was 'Passion of the Christ' Snubbed by Academy?; Rice Expected to Be Approved for Secretary of State Tomorrow."

The program went on to discuss the exclusion of The Passion of the Christ from nominations. For that reason, Sharon von Zwieten felt is would be 'bottom heavy' and 'indeed bigotry' to include the newsprint as well. An expression of compassion on her part I suppose. Ms. von Zwieten never makes the 'reach' to understand there can be discussion without 'Christ' ANYWHERE in the program AND the exclusion of the War Mongering Christian Science Monitor as well.

I can understand that Cable News Networks can be specialized but CNN was never specialized and still withholds advertising to this day regarding that 'leaning' and 'speciality' focus as they are 'Evangelical' and attempting subversion at any cost. It has since been proven in other venues of the programming that subversion of the public is what the agenda is for CNN to include recruitment of young minds and bodies to military service.

Morning papers after the break. (COMMERCIAL BREAK)(ROOSTER CROWING) BROWN: Okeydoke, time to check morning papers from around the country, around the world. I just want to say, I'm not being paid by any government agency to do this segment. Come on, people. "International Herald Tribune"
"Washington Times."
"The Time"

(NOT TO EXCLUDE A MENTION SOMEWHERE WITHIN THIS SEGMENT ANYWAY)
"Passion Earns Three Nominations." We did it differently, didn't we? I guess we did.

"Stars and Stripes"
"Cincinnati Enquirer"
(The Chicago Sun Times) Let's quickly do the weather in Chicago then. "Extra, extra."