Monday, April 12, 2004

U.S. Forces Taking Heavy Casualties in Iraq; 9/11 Hearings Continue Tomorrow

CNN NEWSNIGHT AARON BROWN
 

U.S. Forces Taking Heavy Casualties in Iraq; 9/11 Hearings Continue Tomorrow
 

Aired April 12, 2004 - 22:00 ET
 

THIS IS A RUSH TRANSCRIPT. THIS COPY MAY NOT BE IN ITS FINAL FORM AND MAY BE UPDATED.
 

ANDERSON COOPER, CNN ANCHOR: Good to see you, everyone.As Larry mentioned, Aaron is on assignment interviewing Egypt's president, look for that conversation which airs tomorrow night, to touch on the Israeli-Palestinian situation but also the crisis in Iraq. Certainly there is a lot to discuss about that.In less than two weeks, American forces have taken more casualties than during any period since the invasion a year ago and things look almost as bad for thousands of contractors, American and otherwise, now the target of shadowy kidnappers, in all the makings of a dangerous and uncertain month and it is barely half begun.So, as it has so many times before, the program and the whip begin in Baghdad. CNN's Jim Clancy has the watch this morning. We'll join him shortly.We also are at the Pentagon where the concern is for thousands of American troops not coming home, as well as the shortcomings of their Iraqi counterparts. Jamie McIntyre has that angle on the story, Jamie the headline.

JAMIE MCINTYRE, CNN SR. PENTAGON CORRESPONDENT: Well, Anderson, with the failure of one Iraqi Army battalion to report for battle and the poor performance of other units, the Pentagon is moving to stiffen their resolve and, at the same time, bolster its own troop levels in Iraq too -- Anderson.

COOPER: Jamie, back to you shortly. More fireworks expected in the 9/11 hearings. CNN's David Ensor with a preview for us tonight and a headline -- David.

DAVID ENSOR, CNN NATIONAL SECURITY CORRESPONDENT: Well, Anderson, the witnesses tomorrow will be the leadership, law enforcement leadership of the Bush administration and of the previous Clinton administration and they'll be some very tough questions about how the FBI failed to connect the dots before 9/11. The commission is also now trying to get another presidential daily brief made public. This one was a briefing to President Clinton back in 1998 -- Anderson.

COOPER: All right, David, check back with you shortly, back with all of you.Also ahead on the program tonight the story of Thomas Hamill, an American contractor who went to Iraq to make ends meet back home and who is now a hostage of forces unknown.Also, it hasn't been a question since the -- since the first JFK, John Kerry's relationship with his faith, only this time around there's a twist.And later, U.S. troops in Afghanistan and some unlikely tactics, or so you'd think, in the hunt for bin Laden, all that to come in the hour ahead.We begin with something a former CIA analyst said earlier tonight on CNN. He was talking about the Shiite uprising led by the cleric Muqtada al-Sadr. The rebellion, he said, has failed. If it were a success, he explained, you'd have seen hundreds of American casualties over the weekend not dozens. Cold comfort to be sure.But in Fallujah, a shaky cease-fire appears to be holding and in the Shiite south there are limited signs of progress. That said, the situation in Iraq remains highly fluid, terribly dangerous, so we go to Baghdad and Jim Clancy for the latest.

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

CLANCY (voice-over): This is the face of Iraq's new insurgency, as fuel tankers burn ferociously behind him, a masked gunman vows to fight the Americans. Later, he will tell CNN he seized hostages from the convoy to help in that fight. The Friday ambush west of Baghdad is where insurgents are believed to have kidnapped nine people, including two U.S. soldiers.

BRIG. GEN. MARK KIMMITT, U.S. ARMY: It is not business as usual. We must acknowledge that. There are people out there who are taking hostages. There are people out there who are kidnapping people.

CLANCY: A deadline has come and gone with no word on the fate of American truck driver Thomas Hamill. Two Japanese aid workers and an 18-year-old journalist are still in captivity. In one of the first confirmed released by the hostage takers, seven Chinese were handed over to a Muslim cleric's group. The seven were kidnapped driving in from Jordan to Baghdad in search of work. In all, some 30 people are believed now held hostage. Foreigners jammed a Baghdad travel office trying to book air transport out of Iraq.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: (Unintelligible) in our group is going to leave tomorrow.

CLANCY: His South Korean passport stacked along with others, this man said he was held for three days by Shia Muslim militiamen near Nasiriyah. Whatever officials are saying about the situation improving, he and a lot of others are leaving Iraq.Iraqis themselves continue to stream out of Fallujah. Efforts to broker a full cease-fire are reported making slow progress while Monday night firefights broke out after five Marines were wounded. Insurgents attacked more military supply convoys Monday south of the Iraqi capital burning a shipment of armored personnel carriers. In west Baghdad on a troubled airport road another of the lightly guarded convoys was hit. Looters quickly moved in to raid cargo from a crippled truck.

(END VIDEOTAPE)

COOPER: That was Jim Clancy reporting from Baghdad.Again today, President Bush promised to stay the course in Iraq and commit as many troops to the job as commanders need. For thousands of soldiers looking forward to a homecoming this month, his promise now means a homecoming deferred. Back to CNN's Jamie McIntyre covering that and other developments tonight at the Pentagon -- Jamie.

MCINTYRE: Well, Anderson, the top U.S. commander for Iraq, General John Abizaid, said today that he needs two additional mobile combat brigades, roughly 10,000 troops. He wouldn't say where those troops are coming from but tonight Pentagon sources confirm that most of them will come from soldiers from the 1st Armored Division that had planned to be packing for home right about this time. One reason the Pentagon has to reinforce its troop levels in Iraq is the poor performance of Iraqi soldiers.

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

MCINTYRE (voice-over): When the new Iraqi Army's 2nd Battalion finished its training in January, it was hailed by U.S. commanders as having proud and dedicated soldiers but last week that same Iraqi unit, having just taken casualties after an attack from fellow Iraqis, balked at being sent to join Marines fighting in Fallujah. Frustrated U.S. commanders blame it on a failure of Iraqi command.

LT. GEN. RICARDO SANCHEZ, U.S. GROUND FORCES COMMANDER: Clearly what we faced here in the last week to ten days is a challenge that we've got to confront directly.

MCINTYRE: The breakdown follows another failure of Iraqi police to resist when militia loyal to the anti-U.S. cleric Muqtada al-Sadr seized control of police stations in the Sadr City section of Baghdad.

GEN. JOHN ABIZAID, U.S. CENTRAL COMMANDER: A number of units, both in the police force and also in the ICDC, did not stand up to the intimidators of the forces of Sadr's militia and that was a great disappointment to us.

MCINTYRE: Military officials say the reluctance of some Iraqi soldiers to fight fellow Iraqis is partly based on plain old fear. The U.S. intends to stiffen their determination by adding more American Special Forces to their ranks and replacing weak Iraqi commanders. But the wavering resolve could also be a reflection of what appears to be growing sympathy for the insurgents by ordinary Iraqis, which the U.S. military blames on Arab TV coverage by Al-Jazeera and Al Aribiya, which it argues overemphasizes civilian suffering.

DAN SENOR, COALITION AUTHORITY SPOKESMAN: We encourage all Iraqis, all Iraqi journalists to take some of the reporting that is conveyed on those channels with a grain of salt, with a skeptical eye because it really is, I wouldn't even call it one side of the story. Many of the reports you're seeing are no side of the story.

(END VIDEOTAPE)

MCINTYRE: The Pentagon insists some Iraqi military units are serving with distinction, including some helping in the offensive operations in Fallujah but it's also clear that when the transfer of sovereignty takes place on June 30, it will be the 100,000-plus U.S. troops that will be providing the front line for security -- Anderson.

COOPER: Yes, and that's certainly a change in the plan there. Jamie, you talked about -- a couple of things to talk about tonight but you talked about U.S. commanders looking to replace ineffective Iraqi military officers. Where are they going to get more effective ones? Are they going to be dipping into the pool of former Saddam military leaders who they sort of shunned in the past?

MCINTYRE: Well, they're saying that now that that may be the case, more effective, more experienced military leaders. They've had a longer time now to vet some of those former Iraqi military commanders and they do believe that there are some who may be more effective. The key they believe to getting Iraqi troops to take care of their own security is effective leadership, someone who can inspire the troops and help explain, communicate a little bit better to them what it is they're doing.

COOPER: You also talked about Abizaid talking about bringing in 10,000 troops or delaying the departure of 10,000 U.S. forces. Why not bring in new fresh troops from the United States?

MCINTYRE: Well, they may do that eventually. In fact, there was a meeting today of the Joint Chiefs of Staff to talk about the overall rotation plan but they believe the best short term answer is to use the troops that are there now, the most experienced troops and that's why last week the members of the 1st Armored Division got a letter from their commander saying remember that promise we'd get you home in a year? We're sorry. We're going to have to break it. We need you to stay three more months.

COOPER: So they're saying it's a matter of experience. They want the most experienced people on the ground rather than bringing in new people to try to retrain them?

MCINTYRE: Exactly. They're the ones who built the relationships, have a good idea what's going on. They need to handle some of these situations and they found that when they moved the 1st Armored Division down to retake al-Kut that they were very effective militarily.

COOPER: All right, Jamie McIntyre at the Pentagon, thanks.On to the 9/11 investigation now. Starting tomorrow some of the biggest names in U.S. law enforcement, including U.S. Attorney General John Ashcroft, will take their turn in front of the 9/11 Commission. The questioning is expected to be tough. Whether the FBI and CIA could have done more to prevent the 9/11 attacks has been a focus of the investigation all along.That focus has intensified following the testimony of Condoleezza Rice last week and the declassification over the weekend of a CIA memo. The memo was prepared a month before the 9/11 attacks and it set off a new round of questions.Here's CNN National Security Correspondent David Ensor.

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

ENSOR (voice-over): 9/11 Commissioners want to know more about the 70 FBI al Qaeda related investigations in the summer of 2001 referred to last week by National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice and contained in the now famous August 6 presidential daily brief from the CIA.

GEORGE W. BUSH, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES: You see it meant the FBI was doing its job. The FBI was running down any lead.

ENSOR: Another question from the commissioners why didn't law enforcement connect the dots between Zacarias Moussaoui and the flight training mentioned in the FBI's Phoenix memo? Why didn't the CIA share its information about two al Qaeda suspects in the United States? According to commission sources, Attorney General John Ashcroft will face criticism from then acting FBI Director Thomas Pickard. He has said Ashcroft had little interest in counterterrorism before 9/11, a charge the attorney general's aides reject.The Bush and Clinton law enforcement teams may also be asked whether the U.S. should set up a British style MI5 domestic spy agency and take that job away from the 

 FBI.JOHN LEHMAN (R), 9/11 COMMISSION MEMBER: Their whole internal systems and culture was not to share anything.ENSOR: With the commission staff having seen thousands of classified pages, officials say new revelations can be expected.

TIMOTHY ROEMER, 9/11 COMMISSION MEMBER: There will be some new twists and turns.

ENSOR: Those revelations, sources say, could include more on assistance given to the 9/11 hijackers by foreigners, possibly Saudis. Information on that in the earlier congressional joint committee report was kept classified.

ELEANOR HILL, FORMER STAFF DIRECTOR, CONGRESSIONAL 9/11 COMMITTEE: The words in the report, which were cleared as unclassified, the issue pertains to foreign support for the hijackers, so that's really all I'm allowed to say under the classification rules.

(END VIDEOTAPE)

ENSOR: Commission sources say they're asking the White House to declassify another CIA briefing, a presidential daily brief given to President Clinton back in December of 1998, which included a discussion of the threat of aircraft hijacking by al Qaeda. One commissioner told CNN today that everyone shares some blame for failing to stop 9/11 and he believes that the final report when they put it out in July should name names.

COOPER: Interesting, David Ensor. One of those, I was reading Louie Freeh's op-ed piece in "The Wall Street Journal" today. It was interesting to me that he would put that forth prior to his testimony. I guess trying to sort of set the groundwork for whatever it is he will testify. Is it clear what some of these people are going to say when they sit down?

ENSOR: Well, it's clear what Louie Freeh is going to say. He's going to blame politicians for not having declared war on al Qaeda at an earlier time and not having given him the resources he and others, the resources to go after them sooner.I've talked to commission members who say they don't think any specific -- they don't think it's right to blame the politicians or the bureaucrats running the agencies but they do think that there are faults. There are specific mistakes that were made and that names should be named when those are determined and they expect that their report will do so.

COOPER: It will definitely be an interesting day of testimony. David Ensor thanks.David Ensor, CNN, Washington.

(END VIDEOTAPE)

COOPER: The new questions about 9/11 come on a week heavy with foreign policy concerns for the White House. In addition to the escalating crisis in Iraq, there's the stalled road map to peace in another corner of the Middle East. Israel is putting a new plan on the table. Today, President Bush met with Egypt's leader to discuss ways to address it. Here's CNN's Suzanne Malveaux.

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

SUZANNE MALVEAUX, CNN WHITE HOUSE CORRESPONDENT (voice-over): President Bush's meeting with Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak at his Crawford ranch was the start of a big push to move the peace process forward.

BUSH: I appreciate his frank views on many challenges that face our two nations and that face the greater Middle East.

MALVEAUX: With violence erupting in Iraq and the road map to Israeli-Palestinian peace at a dead end, both were eager to pledge cooperation for change.

BUSH: Our objective in the Middle East must be true peace not just a pause between wars.

HOSNI MUBARAK, EGYPTIAN PRESIDENT: I affirmed to President Bush Egypt's steadfast commitment to do whatever it takes to revive the hope for a comprehensive settlement.

MALVEAUX: Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon is poised to present Mr. Bush with a new plan during his White House visit on Wednesday. Sharon's disengagement plan commits Israel to unilaterally pulling out of Gaza and a small portion of the West Bank. Mr. Bush hopes the plan will restart negotiations on final status issue.

BUSH: If he were to decide to withdraw from the Gaza, it would be a positive development.

MALVEAUX: But its success requires help from Mubarak in policing the Palestinian-Egyptian border.

MUBARAK: We could help a lot in Gaza by training their police, by giving them advice.

MALVEAUX: And over the next several weeks, Mr. Bush will reach out to his closest allies, including British Prime Minister Tony Blair and Jordan's King Abdullah. But the president's agenda for peace is being overshadowed by questions over his handling of pre-9/11 intelligence.

BUSH: There was nothing in there that said, you know, there's an imminent attack.

MALVEAUX (on camera): In an effort to answer those questions about September 11, President Bush announced he'd hold a prime-time news conference Tuesday at the White House.Suzanne Malveaux CNN, Crawford, Texas.

(END VIDEOTAPE)

COOPER: A quick programming note for you. As we mentioned at the top of the program, President Bush -- excuse me, President Mubarak sits down tomorrow with Aaron Brown for a discussion on the visit with President Bush, as well as his take on the challenges facing the United States and Egypt at a very tricky moment in time.Coming up ahead on the program more on the tactics of kidnapping civilians in Iraq, first a break. This is NEWSNIGHT.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

COOPER: Well, back to Iraq now. In the last few days, coalition forces have shifted tactics, implementing unilateral cease-fires and giving negotiators a chance to quell the insurgency that's threatening the mission in Iraq.There are signs tonight that the situation is improving some. A cease-fire in Fallujah appears to be holding and, as we heard earlier, the radical Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr has pulled his militia out of parts of three Iraqi cities. There are many questions tonight, including whether the cease-fire will hold and whether negotiating can bring a permanent end to the crisis. Joining us now is Major General Donald Shepperd, military adviser for CNN, good to see you, general. What do you make of what appears to be a military shift on the ground?

MAJ. GEN. DONALD SHEPPERD, MILITARY ANALYST: It makes sense, Anderson. Basically, you've got to react to Fallujah and the events that took place there the killing of the Americans the burning of their bodies and what have you. You must react to that.We reacted with military force and now it makes sense to take a pause and see if you can negotiate because clearly every time you kill someone you create an enemy, in fact several enemies for the future, the person's family.And so trying to step back and see can we negotiate our way through this so we can bring Fallujah to peace and create a stake for the Sunnis in the new Iraq that's what this pause is about. Hopefully it will pay off -- Anderson.

COOPER: Do you think it's therefore an acknowledgement by the U.S. that really only a political solution ultimately can solve the crisis in Iraq?

SHEPPERD: I think everybody in Iraq on the American side and the coalition side understands that very clearly. Clearly there has to be an Iraqi government that takes over. Clearly U.S. and coalition forces cannot provide security for Iraq. The Iraqis must do it. We must train them to be able to do it and take over and the government itself, some type of government must be prepared to take over by the 30th of June and this is a tall order -- Anderson.

COOPER: Yes, I mean the training of these Iraqi security forces, police, military, you know, I mean if what happened this weekend, apparently one unit of battalion size in Fallujah refused to fight or did not even go in, obviously some police have gone over to Muqtada al-Sadr's militia, from your perspective I mean this training is it going well?

SHEPPERD: Well, it's exceedingly difficult to create a military. We disbanded the old military and we're trying to create a new one and it really takes time because it involves a values based military that understands the concept of values, understands the concept of discipline and loyalty.That's built up over time. You have to have confidence in a government. You have to have confidence in a commander-in-chief and a commander of the armed forces and confidence in your commanders at the unit level and working together and this takes place over time. It's not something that takes place within one year and building that from scratch, again, is a very, very difficult thing.There may be one slight bright side to this. I find it encouraging that someone in the Iraqi military refused to kill other Iraqis when under Saddam they had no trouble killing other Iraqis, so maybe there's a little bright spot in this whole scenario somewhat.

COOPER: Although the U.S. now is considering, according to Jamie McIntyre at the Pentagon, considering going back sort of dipping into that pool of former Saddam military leaders to try to sort of shape up the force that they have now.

SHEPPERD: Indeed. They had some very good leaders in the old Iraqi Army but, as Jamie said, they've had time now to vet them and know who these people are and perhaps they can select some better leadership but it's going to take time. It's not going to come easy and just putting uniforms on people and throwing them into the field and tell them to follow orders is not going to do it. It takes discipline. It takes time. It takes loyalty. All of that is produced over a period of time. We're going to be in Iraq a long time -- Anderson.

COOPER: Are you concerned about mission creep?

SHEPPERD: Absolutely. That's -- there are two things I'm really concerned about. One of them is mission creep. We've been there before in the Vietnam era. Nobody wants to compare this to Vietnam because it's not like Vietnam but the idea we need more and more troops to stay longer and longer is very troubling when what everybody knows is the solution is to train the Iraqis and get them to take over, worried about that.Also worried about the new Iraqi government, when it will take over, what it will look like and how they will have someone that the people across the board in all the factions can look forward to and say these are the leaders that we can have trust and confidence in. Again, lots to be done before the 30th of June and even after that.

COOPER: And, as you watched events play out over the last several days with the taking of these hostages, American and other nations, has that been effective?

SHEPPERD: Well, hostage taking is definitely a tactic that works in some sense. We see surprise attacks. We see ambushes. We see hostage taking. Hostage taking is not something new. We've had it over the years in many locations. It's, again, it's state of the art in Mexico and in South America among the drug lords. It's something that we're cautioned about all the time. It works for a short period of time. What you have to do is you must make sure you don't give into hostage takers. You must negotiate with them and deal with them and talk to them but you cannot give in to them. It won't work over the long haul -- Anderson.

COOPER: So, you're saying actually negotiate with them really by which you mean just talk to them.

SHEPPERD: I mean talk to them. You got to -- every time you talk to them you're keeping the hostages alive. You try to find out what they want, what they will accept, what they back down to. You gain intelligence as you're doing this. So, again, we know over time that hostage taking doesn't work. It does work in the short run but we've got to make sure we don't create a situation in which they can drive all of the coalition nations out except the United States. That's the danger of hostage taking.

COOPER: Major General Don Shepperd always good to talk to you, thanks.

SHEPPERD: A pleasure, Anderson.

COOPER: A few quick items now from around the country to tell you about starting with former counterterrorism Chief Richard Clarke. A Hollywood movie studio has purchased the option for his tell-all book. No word on how much Columbia Pictures paid and no guarantee you'll be seeing it in theaters anytime soon or even at all. Studios often bid on hot properties just to keep them away from the competition. Such is Hollywood.A nationwide ban on the weight loss supplement Ephedra took effect today, this after a federal judge turned down a drug makers last minute appeal. Studies have linked Ephedra to fatal heart attacks and strokes.And a glitch at Los Angeles International Airport left air traffic controllers briefly in the dark and unable to communicate with aircraft. The power was quickly restored. No foul play suspected but dozens of inbound flights were delayed.Coming up tonight, a farmer from Mississippi now held hostage in Iraq, his long journey and how he got there.For NEWSNIGHT, I'm Anderson Cooper. We'll be right back.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

COOPER: That's pretty young.As we reported earlier, at least 30 people are believed to be held hostage tonight in Iraq. They came to Iraq for many different reasons. Some were doing humanitarian work. Others were journalists and still others simply needed a job. We mentioned Thomas Hamill earlier. He came to Iraq all the way from Mississippi. More on his story from CNN's Gary Tuchman.

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

GARY TUCHMAN, CNN NATIONAL CORRESPONDENT (voice-over): In a city with only 2,400 people this was a large gathering.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: You will hear and answer our prayers.

TUCHMAN: One of Macon, Mississippi's own is in peril. Thomas Hamill took a job driving trucks in Iraq. This video was taken by an Australian news crew after he was kidnapped by Iraqi insurgents.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: What happened.

THOMAS HAMILL: They attacked our convoy. That's all I'm going to say.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: OK.TUCHMAN: Hamill's attackers threatened to kill him this past weekend. His wife and two children in seclusion in this home do not know if he is still alive. Macon Mayor Dorothy Hines is close friends with Hamill's wife Kelly (ph).

MAYOR DOROTHY HINES, MACON, MISSISSIPPI: He's just a good old country boy and he just, you know, just wanted to try to get a job and do something that would help his family because they've had a lot of problems with their -- Kelly had open heart surgery, you know, two months ago, you know, health wise and I'm sure something like that can be devastating.

TUCHMAN: In this poverty-stricken part of Mississippi, the 43- year-old Hamill had sold this dairy farm but still found himself in financial trouble. He took the job in Iraq with a division of Halliburton because it paid good money.

SCOTT BOYD, REPORTER, "THE MACON BEACON": It was a chance to go and earn wages much higher than probably what he could have made staying and working here even though there were a lot of sacrifices that came along with the job.

TUCHMAN: And now a community puts up yellow ribbons and American flags and a loving family sits and waits praying that Thomas Hamill hasn't paid the ultimate sacrifice.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Do you want to give us your name?

HAMILL: Hamill, Thomas.

TUCHMAN (on camera): Thomas Hamill's family members have asked the people of Macon to limit their public comments about the situation, their fear that publicity could make things worse for him.Gary Tuchman CNN, Macon, Mississippi. 

(END VIDEOTAPE)

COOPER: Continuing to cover the events in Iraq, it's the cover story in all the major weeklies including "Time" magazine, which titles its reporting "State of Siege."Joining us now "Time's" Baghdad Bureau Chief Brian Bennett, always pleased to have him, Brian thanks for being on the program. 

(CROSSTALK) 

COOPER: I don't know. Have you heard -- there was I think recently crossed the wires about Iraq's most powerful Shiite cleric say coalition must pay for starting crisis about this meeting that they held with Sadr. Have you heard about it? What do you know about it? 

BRIAN BENNETT, BAGHDAD BUREAU CHIEF, "TIME": Muqtada al-Sadr, the reports are saying, has withdrawn his Mahdi Army from the police stations in Najaf. There has been agreements among the Merga that he should withdraw his forces and allow the police and the government and the civil authorities to return to the city. There has been some back-door dealing going on. And it allowed the civil authorities to return to the city and return control to other cities in the south. 

COOPER: What do you make of that? You've been in Iraq a long time. Is that significant? 

BENNETT: It does show the capability of the Governing Council and the other clerics, the other religious clerics working around Muqtada al-Sadr to rein him in a bit. I think it is a success in the short term. But the fact is that Muqtada al-Sadr still maintains the ability to create the civil unrest that he created in the last two weeks. And that capability, at this point, has not been reduced. 

COOPER: And yet -- does it mean that he has sensed that he overreached a bit and he is sort of looking to pull back and sort of regroup? 

BENNETT: Yes, it certainly shows that he believes that the timing wasn't quite right for his uprising, that he had extended himself out too far, that he didn't have the support of the other religious Shiite clergy in the country and he needed to pull back and wait for another time. 

COOPER: The last several days have seen a number of hostages being taken, American and other nation's hostages. How is it affected your work? How has it affected your ability to travel, your ability to move about? 

BENNETT: It has affected my work and the work of most journalists I'm with here in Baghdad tremendously. On Saturday and Sunday, many of us just stayed inside our hotels or various residents in the city of Baghdad. Those who ventured out went to just a few places around the city. Fortunately, yesterday, the streets were -- many of the streets were open again. A lot of Iraqis were getting back to daily life and a lot of journalists were going back out. But it has affected the places where we can travel to. It is incredibly dangerous to travel certainly west of Baghdad towards the area of Fallujah and Ramadi and many other cities to the north and south as well. 

COOPER: On the ground, it is one thing to sort of see images coming here and one interprets those images because you get them from all different parts of the country. On the ground in Baghdad, does it feel like things are better over the last -- than they have been over the last several days or just as bad or worse? 

BENNETT: Things seem to be a lot better inside Baghdad just in the last 24 hours. The streets were busy, instead of being empty, as they were over the weekend. And, as I said, a lot of people were going back to their daily routine of shopping, opening up their stores, and getting back to something of a more normal life. On the other hand, the tone of the city has changed from just a few weeks ago. And, certainly, in a lot of areas of Baghdad, there is still a lot of tension. 

COOPER: All right, Brian Bennett of "TIME" magazine, thank you very much. Still to come tonight, what the FBI knew in the months before 9/11. We're going to speak with a former top FBI administrator as the bureau prepares to go before the 9/11 Commission. First, a break. This is NEWSNIGHT on CNN. 

 (COMMERCIAL BREAK) 

COOPER: Connecting the dots has become the shorthand for what the FBI allegedly failed to do before the 9/11 attacks. Those alleged failures will be the focus of the 9/11 hearings that begin tomorrow. So too will be the much discussed bureaucratic obstacles that prevented the FBI and CIA from working better together. The daily affairs of both agencies are mysterious to most of us, but not to Harry "Skip" Brandon. He was formerly a deputy assistant director of the FBI with the responsibility for the national security and counterterrorism program. He served 23 years in the agency. He's a combat veteran as well. He joins us from Washington. Skip, good to see you on the program. 

SKIP BRANDON, FORMER ASSISTANT FBI DIRECTOR OF COUNTERTERRORISM: Good evening. COOPER: First, let's talk about this negotiation that has gain some moment in many Washington over the last several days, of creating an MI5 style offshoot of the FBI which would handle domestic intelligence. You don't think it is a good idea. 

BRANDON: No, I don't. We could talk for hours about that, if anybody would listen. But, in a nutshell, it strikes me that that is just a bureaucratic solution to what is viewed as a problem. Let's just create another agency. And the FBI can do the job. They have to make changes. They have already started making it. They can do the job. It doesn't make any sense to me to just create another agency and start all over again. 

COOPER: And you actually believe, from what I've read, that you think it is actually an advantage to have agents, field agents for the FBI, who are trained in criminal procedures working on domestic intelligence operations. 

BRANDON: Yes, absolutely. The investigative training that every agent has and the investigative experience that every agent has stands the intelligence collector in very good stead. On top of that, many of these cases, even though they're intelligence cases, may well lead to a point in which prosecution is considered and it is already built. It doesn't make any sense to me to have one agency do a part of it and then have to turn it over to another one and start all over again when you reach that point. 

COOPER: OK, let's talk about this other negotiation which has gained a lot of prominence, the failure or alleged failure by the FBI to connect the dots. How much -- if that that's true, how much of that was a function of the fact that information could not be shared between branches, between arms of the FBI due to U.S. law? How much of it was more sort of procedural FBI culture problems, so to speak? 

BRANDON: Well, the FBI has already looked pretty hard at themselves. And we're all looking very hard at the FBI right now. I think it is important to note the FBI does not operate out of a vacuum. And it is a whole intelligence law enforcement continuum. But there were internal impediments, legal impediments, which precluded sharing information within the FBI and the FBI sharing information with other intelligence agencies. That's been removed. And that's important to note. 

COOPER: But was there something else? Was it just these sort of legal impediments or -- in every movie you see, police agencies have difficult -- it is a stereotype of police agencies. They have it difficult communicating with each other. And, obviously, a lot of people say the FBI and the CIA have that problem, may even still have that problem. 

BRANDON: Yes, there is no question about it. Historically, there have been differences between the FBI and the CIA and a difficulty between two very different cultures in communicating and the differences in the way things were approached. I will tell you that a lot of those differences were being settled prior to 9/11. Apparently, we hadn't gone far enough. We have to hope that all the impediments have been removed now. 

COOPER: When you listen to the testimony tomorrow, what should we listen for? What should the viewer at home be trying to see and hear? 

BRANDON: Well, maybe to wave the flag a little bit. It strikes me that the thing that is most important thing that we need to listen for is, have improvements been made? Are we better off than we were before? If not, we have a lot of changes to make. I have a little trouble with trying to point the finger at one person or two people or something like that to say, we want to blame somebody. Any time something like this happens, there is a failure. To me, the real thrust, the thing to listen for and listen carefully for is, have the changes been made that make us more secure?

COOPER: Interesting to hear your perspective. Harry "Skip" Brandon, thanks very much. 

BRANDON: Surely. 

COOPER: A few business items before we go to break, starting with the Donald. Donald Trump says he'll be doubling his take on the second season of "The Apprentice,' this according to "The L.A. Times," which is reporting he made $50,000 per episode last season. The paper reports he also takes a cut of show-related merchandising and he gets paid a producing fee as well. And sticking to the Big Apple, 45 million subway tokens are melting, not there in the picture, but they've been no good on the system for the last year or so. A scrap metal dealer bought the load for about half a million dollars at a face value of $90 million. The markets today got off to a strong start for the week, investors counting on strong profits to carry the day.Ahead on NEWSNIGHT, presidential candidate John Kerry, a Democrat and a Catholic, some questions about whether he can be both at the same time, but not the ones you might expect.And a new twist in the search for Osama bin Laden, a real song- and-dance routine.From New York, this is NEWSNIGHT. 

(COMMERCIAL BREAK) 

COOPER: Well, religion and politics often cross paths in election years, and this is no exception. The Democratic presidential candidate, John Kerry, took communion yesterday at Easter mass, a private action, potentially with political consequences.Here is CNN's Candy Crowley. 

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE) 

CANDY CROWLEY, CNN SR. POLITICAL CORRESPONDENT (voice-over): He is the first Roman Catholic to top a major national ticket since this Roman Catholic.

JOHN F. KENNEDY (D), PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE: I am not the Catholic candidate for president. I am the Democratic Party's candidate for president, who happens also to be a Catholic. 

CROWLEY: For John Kennedy, the question was, would his religion have too much influence on policy? For John Kerry, the question is -- why doesn't your religion have more influence? 

KERRY: I fully intend to continue to practice my religion separately from what I do with respect to my public life. CROWLEY: Kerry, a former altar boy, who calls himself a believing, practicing Catholic, supports stem-cell research, favors abortion rights and recently voted no to making the death of a fetus a separate count in federal criminal cases, all positions contrary to church theology. As Kerry's national prominence brings the issue to the forefront, there is some protest. 

REV. JOHN MCCLOSKEY, FAITH AND REASON INSTITUTE: You simply cannot do that, because you're living a contradiction. You're giving great scandal to other Catholic citizens, and you're also putting your own soul in peril. 

CROWLEY: Former New York Governor Mario Cuomo, pro-abortion rights and lifelong Catholic, has split this difference before. 

MARIO CUOMO (D), FMR. NEW YORK GOVERNOR: Now, our church teaches life begins at conception. That's a religious principle. It's not a scientific principle. 

CROWLEY: Spiritually, Kerry may merely reflect the struggle of many American Catholics to mesh religion and politics. Politically, the issue may feed his critics, some of who sit in the Catholic pews. 

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: I think that he has flip-flopped a lot on -- has a lot of inconsistent positions on just about everything, and apparently religion is no exception for him. 

CROWLEY: A decision on how church officials should deal with the issue of Catholic politicians may emerge from a meeting of bishops scheduled in November, just after the election. Candy Crowley, CNN, Washington. 

(END VIDEOTAPE) 

COOPER: Still ahead on the program tonight, a kinder and gentler approach in the search for al Qaeda's top leader. This is NEWSNIGHT. 

(COMMERCIAL BREAK) 

 COOPER: Let's check some other stories making news around the world tonight. The promise of free clothing touched off a stampede in Northern India. It began when supporters of a local politician began giving out saris to celebrate his birthday. At least 21 women were killed. And police in Spain arrested three more people in connection with the bombings last month in Madrid. All three are Moroccan. They join 10 other countrymen, two Indians, a Syrian and a Spaniard already in custody. In the fight against al Qaeda in Afghanistan, American forces have at their disposal all the latest from Predator drones to satellite phones to laser-guided just about everything. After all, this is not a tea party. Ah, but it is. The story from CNN's Nic Robertson. 

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE) 

NIC ROBERTSON, CNN SR. INTERNATIONAL CORRESPONDENT (voice-over): Perhaps not what you would expect in the hunt for Osama bin Laden, U.S. troops playing Afghan music while villages dance; 15 miles from the Pakistan-Afghan border, American soldiers are honing new tactics in their search, breaking down cultural barriers, not doors. 

CPT. CHUCK BROOKS, 1ST BATTALION 501ST PARACHUTE INFANTRY REGIMENT: I think overall the population is really coming around. They were a little apprehensive at first. But we've presented enough of a presence where they feel comfortable with us around and they feel like we're really here to help. 

ROBERTSON: On this drive to drum up critical information on the whereabouts of Osama bin Laden and anti-coalition forces, villages encouraged to bring out their sick; 4-year-old Basmina's (ph) skin complaint is common. Through a U.S. interpreter, a father explains. "Our feelings about the coalition haven't changed," he says. "We like them, not just because they help us, but because they bring us security." "If we have any information about Osama, of course we'll contact the coalition," another villager adds, hard for these troops to judge if that's more than an empty promise. 

SGT. JUAN DIAZ, 1ST BATTALION 501ST PARACHUTE INFANTRY REGIMENT: We come here. They offer us tea, they offer us to sit down and eat with them for helping them out. 

ROBERTSON (on camera): Do you think they're going to offer up Osama? 

DIAZ: I couldn't tell you. 

ROBERTSON (voice-over): With so many places to look and only so many troops to do it, local intelligence is critical. 

CPT. KEN COSGRIEF, SQUAD COMMANDER: Working with the community definitely gives us an advantage. They have a feel for what is going on day to day and we obviously can't be in every village. 

ROBERTSON (on camera): Small steps maybe, but success here for the coalition could mean a lead on Osama bin Laden. Success for the Afghans is stability, security and the possibility of economic improvement. Nic Robertson, CNN, Nuikalai (ph), Afghanistan. 

(END VIDEOTAPE) 

COOPER: Well, still ahead on NEWSNIGHT, the latest out of Iraq and a look at what's ahead tomorrow.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK) 

COOPER: And before we go, a quick update of our top story. A shaky cease-fire appears to be holding in Fallujah and in the south. The Shiite uprising has receded, at least a little. However, attacks on American forces continue across the country and so has the kidnapping of foreigners, at least 30 now being held, including 11 Russians. President Bush again today vowed to stay the course, as thousands of American forces are learning they'll be staying in Iraq, not coming home as planned. Tomorrow on the program, Iraq and more as seen through the eyes of Egypt's President Hosni Mubarak. Aaron Brown's exclusive interview, that is tomorrow night on NEWSNIGHT. Thanks very much for joining us. You can join me every weekday night on "360," 7:00 p.m. Eastern. I'll see you there. Have a good night.

TO ORDER A VIDEO OF THIS TRANSCRIPT, PLEASE CALL 800-CNN-NEWS OR USE OUR SECURE ONLINE ORDER FORM LOCATED AT www.fdch.com

Friday, April 9, 2004

Fall of Saddam Hussein, One Year Later; Abduction of Journalists Throws Japan Into Crisis; Stern Versus the FCC

Fall of Saddam Hussein, One Year Later; Abduction of Journalists Throws Japan Into Crisis; Stern Versus the FCC
Aired April 9, 2004 - 22:00 ET

THIS IS A RUSH TRANSCRIPT. THIS COPY MAY NOT BE IN ITS FINAL FORM AND MAY BE UPDATED.

AARON BROWN, CNN ANCHOR: Good evening, again.It has been a year since the statue of Saddam was toppled and it has been a week of the most intense fighting since. That in a sentence is Iraq today. Considerable good and plenty of bad and the bad threatens to undo the good."The Wall Street Journal" today laid out the dilemma for the president quite clearly. There are really no good options, just varying degrees of bad. Use the big guns at the risk of killing more civilians and making matters worse. Pull back, however briefly, and run the risk the insurgents will be emboldened. Try and get more international help but what country would send their soldiers into this mess right now? Indeed the larger problem may be just keeping the small number of coalition troops already there, there. A year since the statue fell, the choices are all bad including the most obvious and likely the worst of all, pulling out all together. Iraq on this anniversary tops the news and begins the whip and we begin in Baghdad and CNN's Jane Arraf, Jane a headline.

JANE ARRAF, CNN BAGHDAD BUREAU CHIEF: Aaron, on this anniversary there's a very different square behind me and a very different Iraq as the United States battles its biggest challenges here since the end of major combat last year.

BROWN: Jane, thank you.Next to Tokyo where the abduction of three Japanese nationals in Iraq has thrown that country's government into a crisis. CNN's Atika Schubert is there and on the videophone, Atika, a headline.

ATIKA SCHUBERT, CNN CORRESPONDENT: Aaron, Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi is standing firm. He says Japanese troops will not be withdrawn from Iraq but time is running out and the government has few if any options left -- Aaron.

BROWN: Atika, thank you.And finally, Crawford, Texas, where the administration is facing a new round of stories on "the memo." CNN's Suzanne Malveaux has the watch tonight, Suzanne a headline.

SUZANNE MALVEAUX, CNN WHITE HOUSE CORRESPONDENT: Well, Aaron, there are really mixed reports tonight. Tonight, the Associated Press saying that this presidential daily brief, a document that is still classified, shows that as early, as recent of May of 2001 al Qaeda operatives were trying to make their way into the United States to carry out some sort of explosives attack. A commission source, a high level commission source I spoke with called that garbage but it is clear that both the White House and the commission are eager to declassify this very hot document -- Aaron.BROWN: Suzanne, thank you. We'll get back to you and the rest shortly.Also on the program tonight, protecting the air waves or going too far, the battle between Howard Stern and the FCC.Plus, the Alamo, the piece of history that hasn't always been accurately told. Tonight, Nissen sees if Hollywood gets it right this time around.And, no Alamo, but perhaps a three-headed Martian or two and, why not, morning papers and this being Friday some much needed relief supplied by the tabloids, all that and more in the hour ahead.We begin tonight in Iraq at the end of another rough day after a deadly week in a difficult year. A quick overview begins near Baghdad Airport. Insurgents attacked a fuel convoy killing a soldier and an Iraqi driver. Two more soldiers and a number of civilian contractors remain unaccounted for. This is just one of 140 attacks on coalition forces this week alone.Sporadic fighting has resumed in Fallujah where earlier today American commanders declared a cease-fire, in part to let residents bury their dead. Reports are sketchy and mixed. The number of Iraqi fatalities in Fallujah is running somewhere between 300 and 450. How many are insurgents, how many ordinary civilians we do not know.Troops have pushed into the southern city of al-Kut taking back ground captured by the followers of the Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr but similar moves into Najaf and Karbala have been put on hold to spare the many pilgrims who have gathered in those cities for a Muslim holy day.Meantime, Secretary of State Powell went on a media blitz this afternoon recommitting to the June 30 date for transferring sovereignty to the Iraqis, acknowledging the difficulties so far and dealing with the "V" word.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

COLIN POWELL, SECRETARY OF STATE: Vietnam was another time, another place, several presidents ago and there is no parallel here and we should not try to contaminate the work we are doing, the important vital work we are doing now by trying to hang ancient labels on it. Let's view the situation for what it is.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

BROWN: Secretary of State Powell this afternoon.Taking stock of the situation in Iraq this past week has been difficult at best. Many questions remain about the size of the insurgency and its potential to spread. At least one thing can be said with certainty. Today was a milestone day that wasn't supposed to look like this.A year ago the world watched as coalition forces toppled the statue of Saddam Hussein in Baghdad while Iraqis cheered. No one thought what would follow would be easy but it has been tougher than many imagined and in many respects tougher than the administration argued it would be. Today in the same square in Baghdad there were no cheers. Here again, CNN's Jane Arraf.

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

ARRAF (voice-over): Instead of celebrating crowds, an uneasy calm and an empty square. Iraqis were told that anyone with weapons would be shot on sight.Where Saddam's statue was toppled, soldiers struggled to remove the image of a new leader, Muqtada al-Sadr who has risen up to challenge them in Baghdad and other key cities.In Fallujah, west of the capital, U.S. Marines halted a fierce and controversial offensive to allow Iraqis to bury their dead and allow aid supplies through. Still, sporadic fighting continued. Iraqi officials said they were trying to negotiate an end to the fighting. Political leaders and humanitarian officials are criticizing the U.S. saying the offensive is taking an unconscionable toll on civilians.The head of U.S. Central Command General John Abizaid visiting Fallujah said the military was fighting a wider battle.

GEN. JOHN ABIZAID, CMDR., U.S. CENTRAL COMMAND: You see it in forms of assassination, kidnapping, intimidating people that want to come forward to peace and prosperity in a new Iraq and until we can break this culture of intimidation we will continue our military operations in the most robust way possible.

ARRAF: The uprising three months before the U.S. is scheduled to turn over control of the country have forced many units to stay put. In the southern Iraqi city of Kut, soldiers from Baghdad's 1st Armored Division, who are on their way home after a year in Iraq, found themselves back in battle instead. The military destroyed Muqtada al- Sadr's office there and said it was close to retaking the town.A day ahead of one of the most important Shia holidays of the year, Sadr remained in control of the holy city of Najaf where non- Muslim forces would spark a crisis.

(END VIDEOTAPE)

ARRAF: This all doesn't seem to be at the point of a broad-based revolt or even a broad alliance between Sunnis and Shias fighting together against the U.S. But although the United States can easily win militarily, if the fighting continues, it risks winning the battles but losing the war for the support of the Iraqi people.Jane Arraf, CNN, Baghdad.

(END VIDEOTAPE)

BROWN: It has been in many ways a rough week all around, a week that is testing the resolve of U.S. allies in Iraq as never before. Twelve foreign nationals were kidnapped in the week. Tonight five of them remain held hostage, three Japanese. We first saw the harrowing pictures of them yesterday. Their captors are demanding that Japan withdraw its troops from Iraq. It is a small contingent, just 550 troops, deployed all in non-combatant roles but still it is the riskiest mission Japan has taken on since the end of World War II and tonight the Japanese prime minister is under enormous pressure.Here again, CNN's Atika Schubert.

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

SCHUBERT (voice-over): The images play and over across Japanese television but there is little that can be done. The Japanese government does not know where the hostages are or even who is behind the kidnapping leaving no one to bargain with, no way to get them back home. There is only the insurgents' demand, Japanese troops must leave Iraq or the hostages will be burned alive.Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi continues to stand firm refusing to withdraw troops from Iraq.

JUNICHIRO KOIZUMI, JAPANESE PRIME MINISTER (through translator): We will not bow to any despicable terrorist threats.

SCHUBERT: But the government is running out of options. It has more than 500 troops on the ground, part of a force that will eventually reach more than 1,000, all taking part in non-combat humanitarian missions.Troops were sent despite the public's deep misgivings that supporting U.S. policy in Iraq would make Japan a target for terror. Now the country's worst fears have been realized.Hundreds of angry protesters gathered outside the prime minister's office demanding Koizumi order the immediate withdrawal of Japanese troops but the public is still deeply divided. Others worry that giving in now may invite more abductions. 

UNIDENTIFIED MALE (through translator): If we give in to their demands now, it may just get worse and the international community would look down at us.

SCHUBERT: That logic is difficult for family members to accept.

NAOKO IMAI, MOTHER OF HOSTAGE (through translator): I want my son to be released and if that means withdrawing the troops, I want them to be pulled out. The troops in Iraq will not (unintelligible) if the government ignores the lives of a few humanitarian workers.

SCHUBERT: For now they can only watch and wait.

(END VIDEOTAPE)

SCHUBERT: Aaron, Japan's vice foreign minister has landed now in Jordan, Amman, Jordan, and he's expected to find some way out of this crisis. We are now two days into a three day deadline set by hostage takers and there is enormous pressure on the prime minister to find a way to resolve this crisis but so far Koizumi has no answers -- Aaron.

BROWN: This pressure on him, is it coming from his own party, is it coming from opposition parties, is it coming from polling, where is it coming from?

SCHUBERT: At the moment it's coming sometimes from the opposition. He was certainly drilled a bit in parliament yesterday by opposition lawmakers who said that they never at the very beginning supported the deployment of troops to Iraq; however, interestingly they did support his position to keep troops there for now saying that Japan should not give into terrorist demands.There is also pressure from the public as you saw demonstrators yesterday and last night, thousands of protesters gathered outside the prime minister's home in a candlelight vigil demanding the immediate withdrawal of troops.Now having said that, the public is still divided. There are many people here who think that Prime Minister Koizumi is doing the right thing. The only problem is there doesn't seem to be any other option and Koizumi is struggling to find a way out of this -- Aaron.

BROWN: Atika thank you, Atika Schubert in Tokyo tonight.It seems a day of bad options. It is, we think, an undeniable, if uncomfortable truth that bad news crowds out good news. It has always been so but good news, or in the case of Iraq progress, ought not be ignored either and progress clearly has been made.While Iraq offers extraordinary challenges, the battle with the insurgents and the lack of credible moderate leaders being two, for many life has improved thanks to the American and coalition effort. No story is black and white and that applies to Iraq even in a week of fighting.From Baghdad for us tonight, CNN's Jim Clancy. 

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

JIM CLANCY, CNN CORRESPONDENT (voice-over): Hundreds of thousands of Iraqi students have returned to refurbish classrooms where teachers are being paid a living wage. For the first time schools are getting computers. But students say the security situation makes it difficult for them to take advantage of the improvements.

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: We are unsafe. The driver who takes us to college carries a gun in order to protect us.

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: Really fed up from this situation. I don't know when it will be solved this problem. I don't know and I'm hopeless. Believe me.

CLANCY: Some improvements don't hinge on security. Electricity has been restored to levels well above those before the coalition invaded Iraq to topple Saddam Hussein. Clean water also widely available sometimes in rural areas that never had it before the coalition arrived.Newspapers and the media are flourishing. There are estimated to be around 200 newspapers published representing views that Iraqis were never able to hear before. Telephone communications not only restored but international links are available that were never possible before and there are several major cell phone providers as well.Internet access, unheard of under Saddam Hussein, is now open along with dozens of Internet cafes, allowing users without computers to get on the Internet for communication and research.Iraqi hospitals, they have seen some improvement, although much more is expected on that front in the coming year. The U.S. is preparing to spend more than $1 billion on new and existing health care facilities.One of the biggest changes Iraqis see is that their own security forces are being trained and ready but they are not ready yet.(on camera): A year after arriving here some members of the U.S.-led coalition say they can't fix everything. They complain that too many Iraqis are standing on the sidelines watching and waiting instead of seizing the opportunities already taking shape in their country.Jim Clancy, CNN, Baghdad.

(END VIDEOTAPE)

BROWN: We have more on Iraq later in the program. Coming up next the memo that electrified the 9/11 hearings yesterday. Some new developments on that tonight.And later a day in the life in the Sunni Triangle.Around the world this is NEWSNIGHT.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

BROWN: Well, this is also the week a presidential memo, upgraded to a starring role in the 9/11 investigation, the president's daily brief from August 6, 2001, surfaced before in the commission's work but yesterday it found itself front and center in some of the harshest questioning of Condoleezza Rice. Ms. Rice described the information in the document as historic, not a warning. She said it lacked specifics. Tonight, the Associated Press is reporting that the memo did, in fact, include some decidedly non-historic information about a possible attack by al Qaeda operatives. That is one version.CNN's Suzanne Malveaux joins us tonight from Crawford, Texas, good evening.

MALVEAUX: Good evening, Aaron.Certainly those reports are mixed this evening just what is in that Presidential Daily Brief. It is still classified at this time but, you are right, it is taking front and center to the main question here what did the administration know about al Qaeda's attempts to actually attack Americans on American soil?

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

MALVEAUX (voice-over): As the president continued his vacation at his Crawford ranch, White House officials were working to declassify a portion of an August 6, 2001 intelligence article, called the President's Daily Brief or PDB.

CONDOLEEZZA RICE, NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISER: I believe the title was "Bin Laden Determined to Attack Inside the United States."

MALVEAUX: In her Thursday testimony before the 9/11 commission, National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice said the document cited 70 FBI investigations into al Qaeda cells in the U.S., as well as earlier warnings of al Qaeda plans to hijack U.S. passenger planes.The PDB was given to the president at his ranch one month before the terrorist attacks on September 11. Some commissioners questioned why the administration couldn't see that an attack was imminent. Rice maintained it was an historical document not a prediction.

RICE: We did not have on the United States threat information that was in any way specific enough to suggest that something was coming in the United States.

MALVEAUX: The administration hopes declassifying the document will help to, as one put it, quell the controversy. A CNN-Time poll released Friday shows Rice's testimony may have bolstered the administration's credibility.In March, just after Richard Clarke's testimony, 54 percent thought the administration didn't do all that could be done to prevent the attacks of September 11. Now that's down to 40 percent.And on the question of who they are more likely to believe, 36 percent say Clarke, 43 percent say Rice. But 60 percent of those polled believe the administration didn't have an al Qaeda strategy before 9/11.

(END VIDEOTAPE)

MALVEAUX: Now tonight the Associated Press is quoting sources that have read the Presidential Daily Brief saying that as early, as recent as May, 2001 and in that brief it said that al Qaeda operatives were making their way to the United States to carry out some sort of explosives attack. I spoke with a high level commission source who said he did not believe that was accurate. He has also read that brief.Now, as you can imagine, Aaron, both the White House and the commission is scrambling to try to declassify that document. Both sides very eager to get their side of the story out -- Aaron.BROWN: Well the document is the document whatever story it holds. Ultimately, I guess, we'll read and decide for ourselves. Is there any sort of timeline? What is the best guess when this will come out?

MALVEAUX: Well, we were actually thinking that it would come sooner than it is actually going to be released. That is because they say that there's a long process and it's been -- it's a rather involved process here trying to figure out what is going to be redacted, what gets included, what remains classified.We expect, however, this is going to come out fairly soon at least within the next couple of days. This is something that all sides are working to get out as quickly as possible because the worst thing for the White House here is to see these kind of leaks.

BROWN: Well that and just the title I think makes it all uncomfortable for the White House so it's in its interest to get it out. Suzanne, thank you down in Crawford, Texas with the president over the Easter holiday.Former Senator Gary Hart has spent a great deal of time thinking about terrorism. He chaired the U.S. Commission on National Security, a bipartisan panel, created by President Clinton to produce a report for the incoming administration.That report was delivered to the Bush White House eight months before 9/11. Among other things, it warned that a devastating attack on the United States was imminent and that the FBI wasn't working the way it should to stop the plot. The commission also recommended creating a Department of Homeland Security. Mr. Hart is now advising John Kerry's presidential campaign and we talked to the former Senator earlier today.

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE) 

BROWN: Senator, it seems to me you have been as reluctant as anyone to give anybody, either party, any president, a free ride on the notion that everything that could have been done was done, fair enough?

GARY HART, CO-CHAIRMAN, U.S. COMMISSION ON NATIONAL SECURITY: Yes, it is. I think there -- I don't think we ought to be in the business of allocating blame but I think there's plenty of blame to go around and I do think the issue of accountability is a serious one.

BROWN: On the question of accountability, I read an interview the other day where you said it was surprising, a bit curious to you that no one has been held accountable in the intelligence community at the FBI for the failures of 9/11 and you had a pretty harsh theory on that.

HART: Well, there are only two possibilities I think with regard particularly to Iraq. I know we're talking about 9/11 but either the president was misled or not informed or the president misled the American people. In any case, somebody has to account for the misleading.And I think on 9/11 if the president was not warned then heads should have rolled and if the president was warned and did nothing then perhaps the presidential head should roll.

BROWN: Is there any -- back to 9/11 and the commission, was there -- did you get any clarification yesterday in Dr. Rice's testimony or was it pretty much what you expected?

HART: It was almost exactly what I had expected. I thought the drum roll up to her testimony was kind of overdone. She essentially said what one would expect her to say. We were considering all threat concerns and none more important than the others. But I do think history will show the administration was preoccupied in its early months with long term issues like missile defense and the China threat and a whole lot of other abstractions, including Saddam Hussein when, in fact, 3,000 American lives were lost because they didn't up the sense of urgency about preparing us for attacks.And I also must say I think it's very disingenuous to say no one told us what day, hijacked airplanes, what buildings. That's not sufficient for the people who have taken a constitutional oath to defend and protect the security of the United States.

BROWN: I think some people would say you are viewing this with not simply the clarity of hindsight but with the clarity of 9/11 actually having happened and that we all see things, including warning signs, differently post 9/11. Is there any truth in that?

HART: Well, I think the Pearl Harbor analogy works in a way. If Franklin Roosevelt had been warned by 14 reasonably, well in fact present company excepted, deeply experienced people in national security that the Japanese were going to attack America sometime, someplace, somehow and had done nothing to get ready for that I think he would have been held very seriously accountable.So, the issue, the issue is what went wrong and how can we prevent it in the future? I know a lot of people are saying let's not look back. Let's look forward. But we will repeat history unless we find out what went wrong and I think there was just lassitude on the part of policymakers and administrators all the way up the chief executive.

BROWN: Let me ask then the sort of baseline question here. Dr. Rice was asked this. Mr. Clarke was asked this. Do you believe in your heart of hearts that anything could have been done that would have prevented the attacks on 9/11 and, if so, what?

HART: Yes, of course. The fact that somebody in our government in the intelligence services, I think FBI knew that two people on the terrorist watch list were already in the United States. I think everybody knows if that had been pursued and shared throughout the agencies and there had been again from the top down a sense of heightened urgency and emergency I think we could have prevented it and the 9/11 commission are going to have to answer that question. I think with Congressman Hamilton a lot of things had to happen right but they could have happened right if there had been this sense or urgency.

BROWN: Do you think you should testify before the commission?

HART: I'd put it the other way around. For a federal commission to be taken seriously I think it itself must take its predecessor commission seriously. I find it difficult to believe that 9/11 will be taken seriously if it doesn't publicly hear from the commission that warned that these attacks were going to occur.Our commission wasn't just another federal commission. The work we did had not been done in this country since 1947, so this was a two and a half year effort that was very, very serious.

BROWN: Senator we appreciate your time. It's good to see you, sir. Thank you very much.

HART: My pleasure. Thank you.

BROWN: Thank you.

(END VIDEOTAPE)

BROWN: Former Colorado Senator Gary Hart now with the Kerry campaign. We talked with him earlier today.Coming up on the program, back to Iraq then and now, the difference a year makes, the difference it doesn't, a break first.From New York this is NEWSNIGHT.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

BROWN: More now on Iraq a year later and Iraq in the days and weeks ahead. We're joined by James Kitfield, the National Security and Foreign Affairs Correspondent for "The National Journal." He's been in and out of Iraq a bunch of times over the last year, pleased to have him with us tonight. Good to see you.What have we learned in the last week and should we be surprised by any of it?

JAMES KITFIELD, "THE NATIONAL JOURNAL": Well, I think what we've learned in the last week is that from the very beginning the Americans in Baghdad and the rest of Iraq have thought that they had a window of forbearance amongst the Iraqis after which our sort of presence of so many troops and an occupier would become sort of abhorrent to them.I think we learned this week that maybe that window is shutting a bit faster than we thought. I know for a fact the military was somewhat surprised that Mr. Sadr had -- was able to really rouse up as much support as he was able to.And I think we have reiterated the fact that this nation building -- I called it nation building by shock therapy. We have a very, very aggressive schedule to do this. With aggressive schedules, unfortunately, most things have to go right and you have to be kind of lucky. Some things have not gone right, and we've been unlucky a few times. And I think it's going to lead to a very shaky summer as we try to hand off power. 

BROWN: Let's just focus for a minute I guess on the Shia problem, and it is a problem. To what degree has it grown do you think from a fairly narrow base to a larger one? 

KITFIELD: Well, you know, I still buy the argument that Mr. Sadr does not have really broad support. There's been a lot of recent polling done where most Shiites do not want the sort of varied, you know, the theocratic government that he has, sort of the Iranian 1979 revolution sort of model. But what he seemed to be able to tap into is a general feeling of resentment from the occupation, from the fact that the political progress seems to be so uncertain. No one knows who's going to be handed power to in June 30. So I think there is growing resentment there. But I buy the administration's argument to date that it is not a widespread revolt that he's been able to ignite yet. BROWN: And where has Sistani been in this and where has the Governing Council been over the last week?

KITFIELD: Well, the Governing Council -- it's a very interesting question, because Sistani, his role is not exactly clear. We had a plan in December. The interim government would be picked by caucuses. He nixed that and they went back to the drawing board. They had a plan for the interim constitution. It was signed by the Iraqi Governing Council. He has big problems with that and won't meet with the U.N. representative, Mr. Brahimi, because of his objections to the interim constitution.So his objections to what's happening feeds into this sort of unrest in the Shiite community I think that we're seeing the results of this past week. 

BROWN: And the Governing Council, has it been helping this week? 

KITFIELD: It has been helpful.The Governing Council is talking back channels to Sistani. And he issued this fatwa that, although it sounded to American ears that he sort of condemned the reaction of the coalition, it also sent the message to Mr. Sadr that his forces should at this point seek to find some peaceful way out of present turmoil. So I think that was fairly important to Shiite years and I think the Governing Council has been helpful in the sense they have opened these back channels and him and trying to find some arrangement by which he gives it its blessing and we can find a peaceful solution to the turmoil of the last few days. 

BROWN: And, finally, what will you look for in the next week or two weeks. What will be the most important thing to keep an eye on? 

KITFIELD: The most important thing to keep an eye on is to see if this revolt that Sadr has sort of tried to ignite actually catches flame. In other words, does it move beyond his hard-core 2,000- or 3,000-person militia and actually get sort of widespread groundswell support. I don't expect that to happen, but if that does happen, we're in for a very long summer. 

BROWN: Jim, good to have you with us. Thanks a lot. 

KITFIELD: Thank you. 

BROWN: Jim Kitfield of "The National Journal."Still to come on the program tonight, a change of gears, to be sure, shock jocks and shocking fines. Is it a witch-hunt or just the government doing the job the country wants it to do? This would be about Howard Stern, wouldn't it? And this is NEWSNIGHT.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK) 

BROWN: You can argue that Howard Stern is sick. You can argue he isn't funny. You can even change the station. We recommend that. But should the government have a say in what he says? You can also argue the should, but by law, the government does. Even now, the airwaves are considered a public trust, subject to public standards of decency. And lately, the guardian of that trust, the FCC, has been cracking down on the stations running Mr. Stern's programming. They in turn have been coming down hard on him. Here's CNN's Adaora Udoji. 

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE) 

ADAORA UDOJI, CNN CORRESPONDENT (voice-over): Shock jock Howard Stern is facing federal regulators with new tactics when it comes to questions of decency. They're calling segments in one of his shows patently offensive, fining the Clear Channel radio stations which aired it nearly half a million dollars. Fellow talk show host Don Imus says the decision's bad news. 

DON IMUS, RADIO TALK SHOW HOST: I just think it's such a dangerous sort of precedent. 

UDOJI: In its crackdown, the Federal Communications Commission concluded Stern's discussion about oral and anal sex to the sounds of flatulence went too far, and for the first time, it issued multiple fines out of a single show, as opposed to one monetary punishment no matter how many violations in that show. 

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Here I am going to jail. 

UDOJI: The FCC has also come down hard on other shock jocks, like Bubba Sponge Love in Florida, slapping his show with a $700,000 fine. Constitutional experts worry there's growing intensity to conform, coming in the wake of Janet Jackson's breast-bearing performance at Super Bowl. 

MICHAEL RATNER, CONSTITUTIONAL EXPERT: Who decides what's indecent except a group of guys in Washington? That seems to be a violation of the First Amendment. I wouldn't call them a band of Nazis but I do think there is some kind of vendetta against Stern. 

UDOJI: On vacation this week, Stern said he is the victim of a witch-hunt saying -- quote -- "It's pretty shocking that governmental interference into our rights and free speech takes place in the U.S. It's hard to reconcile this with the land of the free and the home of the brave."Others just as vehemently argue free speech is not without boundaries. Jack Thompson, a parent advocate, filed the complaint which led to the fine. 

JACK THOMPSON, STERN CRITIC: The public airwaves are to be protected because of the vast number of children in the audience. 

UDOJI: But this fine only involved six stations. It won't happen there again. Following the FCC's action, Clear Channel dropped Stern's show. (on camera): But the show, owned by Infinity Broadcasting, remains on several dozen other stations, stations that are well aware the FCC is watching more closely. It's just not clear what they plan to do about it. Adaora Udoji, CNN, New York. 

(END VIDEOTAPE) 

BROWN: A quick "Moneyline Roundup" now, starting with former Enron CEO Jeffrey Skilling. Mr. Skilling was taken to a Manhattan hospital early this morning after police responded to complaints that he was acting erratically and accusing patrons in a bar of being FBI agents while he grabbed their clothes. And according to the NYPD, Mr. Skilling was intoxicated and uncooperative, no charges filed. As you may know, Mr. Skilling has problems. He already faces an armful of felony charges in connection with the Enron mess. He's pleaded not guilty.And Mac users now have something P.C. users have always to worry about, the first known big-time Internet variety called MP3 Concept. It is being seen more as a proof of concept than a serious threat to Apple Computers. But experts do worry it could be a sign of bugs to come. The markets closed today because of Good Friday. Ahead on NEWSNIGHT, one of the toughest neighborhoods in the Sunni Triangle and home to Lieutenant Colonel Nate Sassaman -- a day in his life, a long day, after the break.This is NEWSNIGHT. 

(COMMERCIAL BREAK) 

BROWN: A year after the occupation of Iraq began, CNN's Nic Robertson returned to take stock. You can see his full report this Sunday in a one hour "CNN PRESENTS" special. Tonight, an excerpt, life in the Sunni Triangle 12 months later. 

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE) 

NIC ROBERTSON, CNN SR. INTERNATIONAL CORRESPONDENT (voice-over): Lieutenant Colonel Nate Sassaman.

LT. COL. NATE SASSAMAN, U.S. ARMY: Two-zero-three-five-seven.

ROBERTSON: West Point quarterback 1985. 

SASSAMAN: OK, all right, good, let's go. 

ROBERTSON: Now hard-charging commander of 600 men tackling one of Iraq's toughest neighborhoods, Balad in the Sunni Triangle north of Baghdad. 

SASSAMAN: OK, Nic, this is where they fired from the other day right here. 

ROBERTSON: A mortar position used by insurgents to fire on his base. (on camera): And you returned fire right away? 

SASSAMAN: Yes, within five minutes. That's one of our rounds right there. It's more of a show of force. It definitely galvanizes the community to rally around finding who these two folks or three or four folks are. OK, what are we looking at right here? 

ROBERTSON (voice-over): More persuasion is coming. (on camera): In less than an hour's time, an F-16 is going to drop a 500-pound right here. And that is designed to send a message to the insurgents not to fire mortars. (voice-over): Sassaman pulls his men out. But despite coordination with the Air Force, the F-16 will arrive before curfew. Sassaman warns local farmers. 

SASSAMAN: We're having to drop a bomb right now for where they shot at us yesterday. 

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Five-minute window, sir. They want to drop it now. 

SASSAMAN: OK. They're good. 

ROBERTSON: Pressed for time, Sassaman heads for base. As darkness falls on the way back, news over the radio, an Iraqi shot by Sassaman's troops. Within minutes, Sassaman is on the scene. 

SASSAMAN: Did you find an exit wound, too? One he's got the I.V. going, I want him out of here. So, let's go. Just another day in Balad. I'm going to tell you, it's wearing on me, and it's wearing on all the soldiers, too. We're -- you can tell -- 10 months. Some folks are tired. 

ROBERTSON: Another pressure on Sassaman. The number of detainees suspected of aiding the insurgency is mounting. Through the day, more brought into to the primitive lockup. This rare glimpse of detainees reveals poor security. The captives have full view of informers arriving to brief Sassaman's men. Some of the soldiers here on the edge. Another told us he wanted the prisoners to try to escape so he could shoot them. Since our visit, Sassaman improved detainee security. He's also been reprimanded for backing his soldiers and impeding an investigation when some of his men were accused of pushing an Iraqi off a bridge to his death in a river below. At the time of interview, Sassaman talked of the stress on him. 

SASSAMAN: It is really hard being away. And I really feel for the kids. My son has lived with almost two years without a father. My daughter misses her dad. And then Marilyn (ph) and I are probably going to start over with some dates and then just getting to know each other. 

ROBERTSON: Time to reflect, though, is rare. The sun's going down. 

SASSAMAN: And then we'll go down to pediatrics.

SASSAMAN: But it's far from the end of Sassaman's 20-hour day, a visit to Balad Hospital, this one bringing him some joy. 

SASSAMAN: Oh, I don't know if the kids should be eating that now. When you invest a year of your life, when you have had a couple of your soldiers die on this soil, we have paid a high price. The final solution is Iraqis making those decisions for Iraqis. We just have to set the conditions, so that they can have long-term security and peace. 

ROBERTSON: Nic Robertson, CNN, Balad, Iraq. 

(END VIDEOTAPE) 

BROWN: Nic's full report, "Hope and Fear: Journeys in the New Iraq," premieres Sunday 8:00 Eastern time. This is a terrific piece of work. "Hope and Fear" this weekend on "CNN Presents." Still ahead from us tonight, lines drawn in the sand, fighting until the end, amazing victories. Remember the Alamo? Well, maybe not as well as you might think. We'll take a break first. 

(COMMERCIAL BREAK) 

BROWN: So remember the Alamo? If you do from movie Westerns and TV serials, chances are you really don't. But wouldn't you know Hollywood has a refresher course opening in theaters today called "The Alamo," based on a true story, of course, only this time, a little less of the based on and a lot more of the true. Here's CNN's Beth Nissen. 

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE) 

BETH NISSEN, CNN CORRESPONDENT (voice-over): Since 1915, there's been at least 12 movies on the Alamo, some produced by the biggest studios in Hollywood and starring some of the biggest Hollywood names. John Wayne directed and starred in the famous 1960 depiction of the historic siege, although the film had little to do with history. 

FRANK THOMPSON, ALAMO FILM HISTORIAN: It is a total work of fiction. There is nothing in that film, not one line, not one costume, not one set, not one event, not one character that corresponds to historical reality in any way, shape, or form. 

NISSEN: Film historian Frank Thompson, who is author of five books on the Alamo, says it's the mythic version of the story that has usually wound up on film. 

THOMPSON: The issue of historical accuracy has never really even been approached by an Alamo film. For some reason, they never want to tell the story as it happened in 1836. 

NISSEN: The new film, he says, is different. 

SASSAMAN: This movie is the first time that they've ever taken at least what we think we know about the Alamo very seriously at all. 


NISSEN: Americans fiercely attached to the mythic version of the Alamo, meaning pretty much all Texans, will not find cherished iconic scenes in the film, like William Travis and his line in the sand. THOMPSON: In the myth, he draws a line in the sand with his sword and asks that everybody who will stay and die with him cross over the line. I don't know of a serious historian who believes that this happened. 

NISSEN: In the new movie, Travis doesn't draw a line, although he has a few lines. 

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP, "THE ALAMO") 

PATRICK WILSON, ACTOR: If you wish to stay here in the Alamo, then we'll show the world what patriots are made of. 

(END VIDEO CLIP) 

NISSEN: As for Davy Crockett, most previous Alamo movies depict him fighting bravely to the death at the mission. 

THOMPSON: In the previous Alamo films, the myth always holds sway, Davy Crockett swinging his rifle, Old Betsy, until he's overcome by hordes of Mexican soldiers. 

NISSEN: The new film draws on both Texan and Mexican historic accounts and documents in depicting Crockett's end. 

THOMPSON: The only eyewitness account that specifically mentions his death is by a Mexican officer named Jose Enrique de la Pena. This is a hotly contested manuscript. But he says that Crockett was captured, brought before Santa Ana and then executed. 

NISSEN: That doesn't change the portrayal of Crockett as a hero, just reflects the culture's changing view of heroism. 

THOMPSON: I think we're just in a point of history where we don't really believe in the pristine hero, that we want to see human beings and how they act under pressure. 

NISSEN: The greater care with historical fact, with authentic detail in the setting and the costumes only adds, say Thompson, to the core power of the Alamo story, a story that has resonated with every generation of Americans since before the Civil War. 

SASSAMAN: It's all about courage. It's all about standing up against overwhelming odds. It's hard to look at this film without thinking of the situation overseas. Certainly, we have brave American soldiers who are fighting overwhelming odds. Every Alamo movie is about the time it was made, much more than it's about 1836. 

NISSEN: One reason the story, the myth of the Alamo, endures. Beth Nissen, CNN, New York. 

(END VIDEOTAPE) 

BROWN: Morning papers and a tabloid story or two after the break. 

(COMMERCIAL BREAK) 

(ROOSTER CROWING) 

BROWN: Okeydokey, time to check morning papers from around the country and around the world. We'll throw in a tabloid or two, this being Friday and this being a week where we need a something, don't we? It's been a pretty tough week. "International Herald Tribune" published by "The New York Times" in Paris leads thusly. I don't know why I say. "Marines Pause, But Clashes Continue One Year After the Fall of Baghdad. Allies Shaken." And yet again, on the "International Herald Tribune," a pretty good picture on the front. Couple of stories to point out. Just below the picture, "Berlin and Paris Step Back on Iraq." It's an analysis piece on how in this week of clashes and difficulties for the Americans, both the Germans and the French, the French government and the German government, have been pretty quiet, and in that way supportive of the American effort. And down at the bottom, "The Martha Stewart of China." Martha Stewart will make another appearance in the program in just a minute or two. 

"Philadelphia Inquirer." We appreciate this, because, clearly, they haven't finished the makeup of the front page, but they got us what they could, so thank them for that. "Battles Erupt Across Iraq. Six More U.S. Troops Are Killed." This is how they will lead. This is the story I'll read first, though. "Emotion Grips Arnie and His Adoring Army. A Golf Legend Says Goodbye to Augusta." Arnold Palmer, a native son of Pennsylvania, played his last round as a tournament player at Augusta; 50 consecutive years he played there. People loved him when he started and they loved him today, I'll bet. Anyway, that's "The Philadelphia Inquirer."

"The Hartford Courant" leads, "Fighting Intensifies Across Iraq." They also put an Easter story on the front page. "The Faithful Walk in Christ's Steps." So they take a look at that as well in their Saturday edition. How we doing on time? I'm sorry, how we doing on time? Oh, OK, fine, if I keep asking, we'll finally get it down to a minute. 

"The Times Herald Record." "Why Are They Here? Assemblyman Goes Door to Door to Find Out Why Sex Offenders Are Being Dumped on the city." This is the Hudson Valley in the Catskills of New York. And let me do this one. I love this one. This is 

"The Burt County Plaindealer" in Burt County, Nebraska. Get a shot of the picture on the front page here of these two kids. This is Sadie Brown (ph) and Hunter Gordon (ph). And they were at Herman Elementary School there in Burt County. And they had a little talent contest. Now, are those the two cutest kids you ever saw in your life? My goodness. OK, speaking of adorable, 

"The Weekly World News" this week leads with Martha Stewart. "Inside Martha's Jail Hell." And then some of the items that Ms. Stewart will see. Also, it's kind of -- I guess it's Easter week, so they're doing some theological stuff. "NASA Space Probe Picks Up Message From God. Give Up Your SUVs. They're Polluting My Universe. I Approve of Same-Sex Marriage for Priests." God actually said these things. "And Mel Gibson's Passion Movie is Right on the Money." That's according to "The Weekly World News." They have a couple of political stories. "Bush Proposal to Beat Global Warming, A Swimming Pool in Every Backyard in America For Free." Sure. And just to show they will play with anyone, "John Kerry Is An Alien. No Human Has a Head That Long and Narrow, Says Doctor." There we go. We'll see you next week. Have a wonderful weekend, a great Easter. Good night for all of us. 

TO ORDER A VIDEO OF THIS TRANSCRIPT, PLEASE CALL 800-CNN-NEWS OR USE OUR SECURE ONLINE ORDER FORM LOCATED AT www.fdch.com