Thursday, March 11, 2004

Terrorists Target Spain; Accused Iraqi Agent Arrested

Terrorists Target Spain; Accused Iraqi Agent Arrested

Aired March 11, 2004 - 22:00 ET

THIS IS A RUSH TRANSCRIPT. THIS COPY MAY NOT BE IN ITS FINAL FORM AND MAY BE UPDATED.

ANDERSON COOPER, CNN ANCHOR: And a good evening to you. I'm Anderson Cooper, in for Aaron Brown, who is on assignment right now in the Middle East.In Spain, they are calling it their 9/11, the worst terrorist attack ever within its borders, the worst in all of Europe since the bombing of Flight 103 over Lockerbie, Scotland. The scope and the M.O. of the attack sobering, 10 explosions on three commuter trains during the early morning rush hour in Madrid, all the bombs in backpacks. Tonight, the rescue work goes on as the questions pile up.Spain is where "The Whip" begins. And Christiane Amanpour, our Chief International Correspondent, starts us off with a headline -- Christiane.

CHRISTIANE AMANPOUR, CNN CHIEF INTERNATIONAL CORRESPONDENT: Anderson, the leaders of Spain are calling for mass rallies, a show of defiance against these killers. And, also, they're vowing never to surrender to what they're calling mass murder. 

COOPER: Back you shortly.Next to politics, rough-and-tumble, name-calling, rock-'em-sock- 'em politics with the prospect of eight months of it still to come. CNN's John King at the White House for us tonight -- John, the headline.

JOHN KING, CNN SR. WHITE HOUSE CORRESPONDENT: Anderson, first thing tomorrow morning, the Bush campaign launches its first attack ads of the general election. It accuses Senator John Kerry of wanting to raise taxes by more than $900 million, calls him wrong on taxes, wrong on defense. It's the earliest an incumbent president has ever gone on the air attacking his opponent. 

COOPER: Finally Boston and the legislative trench warfare on the question of same-sex marriage. CNN's Gary Tuchman on Beacon Hill tonight -- Gary, the headline. 

GARY TUCHMAN, CNN NATIONAL CORRESPONDENT: Well, Anderson, demonstrators are still on the streets of Beacon Hill, as Massachusetts legislators continue to argue about whether to overturn a court decision that legalized gay marriage. 

COOPER: All right, back to all of you in a moment. Thanks, Gary. Back to the rest of you. Also coming up tonight on the program, a $5 million payday for some victims of prosecution misconduct in a small Texas town by the name of Tulia. Later, we'll look at the big business in human body parts. That's right, I said human body parts. What really happens when you donate your body to science?And we'll go "On the Rise" with the young man who made a name for himself by selling his novel in a novel way, on the subway. All of the ahead.We begin with the devastating day in Madrid. At least 192 people are dead, 1,400 wounded. The question of responsibility lingers in the air, though Spanish officials believe they have a chief suspect, but questions, too, about that. Here, again, CNN's Christiane Amanpour 

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE) 

AMANPOUR (voice-over): For the Spanish, Atocha is now a station of horror. At 7: 30 this mornings, the young and the old were heading into school and to work when massive explosions ripped great holes into their commuter train. 

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE (through translator): I could hear people screaming. I don't know. It's something that I can't explain. I will not recommend it to anybody. 

AMANPOUR: Suddenly, in central Madrid, there were makeshift morgues flooded with desperate families. Mobile phones of the dead could still be heard ringing. Hearses wound through the streets, carrying bodies away from the carnage. Ordinary citizens lined up to donate blood. It is as close to a war zone as this generation has seen. 

UNIDENTIFIED MALE (through translator): I saw dramatic scenes of people covered in blood. 

AMANPOUR: You knew the remains of a woman lay here by the stilettos that poked from the blanket. Elsewhere, limbs severed from torsos lay in pools of blood. And even the very young joined in hauling away the dead and wounded. Spanish officials say ETA, the armed Basque separatist group, is their prime suspect for now. But they say they have found detonators and a tape of Koranic versus in a van near the commuter route. 

UNIDENTIFIED MALE (through translator): Because of this, I have just given instruction to the security forces not to rule out any line of investigation. 

AMANPOUR: The Spanish royal family went to hospitals consoling victims and the king called for unity. 

JUAN CARLOS, KING OF SPAIN: In these moments of immense pain, Spaniards have been called to once again reaffirm our determination to end violence and terrorism. 

(END VIDEOTAPE) 

AMANPOUR: Now, last time the Spaniards turned out in massive show of defiance was in 1997, when ETA kidnapped and then shot a councilman. Six million Spaniards turned out to demonstrate against this kind of violence. And the authorities here are saying that, ever since then, ETA has mostly been on its hind legs. The authorities feel that they had really cracked down on ETA and its ability to kill and create mayhem had been severely disrupted over the last several years. Now they're saying they feel they have forensic evidence that leads them to ETA. They're also saying that this shows that ETA was trying to make one last show of strength and get back into the game, but at the same time, as we've reported, there may be another line of investigation into just what was that van with the detonators in it and the tapes of those Koranic verses -- Anderson.

COOPER: Christiane, I'm not sure if in past attacks ETA has claimed credit, if that's the right word. I'm not sure if that's their M.O. This time, have they made any kind of a statement? 

AMANPOUR: Well, a lot of people were saying this couldn't be ETA because nobody claimed -- rather, nobody sent out any warnings. But, in fact, authorities say that ETA has, in it past, committed these kind of murders either warning in advance or not warning in advance. But ETA itself, the Basque separatist group, which is, in fact, a terrorist organization, designated, has not claimed responsibility. And the political wing of ETA, a spokesman for that group, which has also been banned, has said that it could not be ETA, that this is simply not something that it would do. But I must say, the Spanish authorities were very emphatic early on and even tonight continue to be emphatic that they remain the prime suspects, but there are, as you say, all these questions about the incredible scope and the magnitude of this attack, which bears more similarities to the attacks that al Qaeda and other Islamic groups have committed recently than those that ETA have been capable of mounting. 

COOPER: All right, Christiane Amanpour, thank you very much, live from Madrid. As Christiane said, a lot of questions tonight still unanswered. Jim Walsh is a terrorism and international security analyst and Harvard's Kennedy School of Government.We are pleased he joins us now. Jim, good to see you. Sorry it's under these circumstances.What is it that points away from ETA? Is it just the simultaneous attack, 10 bombings, 10 backpacks? 

JAMES WALSH, KENNEDY SCHOOL OF GOVERNMENT: No, it's more than that, Anderson. If ETA is responsible for this, there are a number of puzzles. First of all, this would be the biggest ever attack by ETA in the history of the group going back to 1959. And most observers believe that ETA was, as Christiane has said, on the defensive. It had taken several hits particularly since 9/11. Since 9/11, it had been labeled a terrorist group by the European Union, by the United States. There were increased and coordinated police actions against it.And even just last month, there were police actions that arrested ETA members and over 1,000 pounds of explosives. So, if they were responsible, it does raise the question about how could they do such a large attack, when they've never done so before and now, particularly, since they seem to be on the defensive. 

COOPER: And speaking for it being an attack by al Qaeda or an al Qaeda-linked group or al Qaeda sympathetic group, are what? There's the simultaneous attacks, the scope of the attacks, some 10 bombing. And I guess there was statement from or alleged statement from bin Laden several months ago in which they directly referenced Spain. Are those sort of the main factors? 

WALSH: Those are all circumstantial bits of evidence that would point you in the direction of al Qaeda. I would add to that, however, you also have Spain, which has been a major and very visible ally of the United States in Iraq and elsewhere. Al Qaeda has mentioned Spain, along with other countries as potential targets because of its support of the U.S. position and the geography of Spain. If you look at a map, it is only spitting distance from Morocco to Spain and, of course, we had attacks in Morocco, as well as Saudi Arabia from al Qaeda-linked groups earlier. So geography, motivation and the factors you name are all reasons to also suspect al Qaeda. And I'll simply end by saying it, of course, might be -- and this would be quite unprecedented -- but it might be combination of the two. 

COOPER: And, as you mentioned, I was reminded of something else. There is the Andalucia region of Spain, which I think there is historical ties to some -- Islamic religious groups are saying they want the region to secede based on their interpretation of history.You mentioned the idea of possible linkage, though. How realistic is that? If al Qaeda is on the run being monitored, how likely is it that they would reach out or be even able to reach out to a group like ETA? 

WALSH: Well, on the face of it, you'd have to be skeptical about some kind of collusion between ETA and al Qaeda. They're different groups. ETA is motivated by separatists. Desire is really culturally and geographically driven, whereas al Qaeda is religiously driven and focused in other areas. But they share in this particular case a common enemy, which would be the Spanish government. So there's a possibility there. And also, it has to be said that al Qaeda is morphing. It used to be the organization, the international organization engaging in terrorism, and everyone else sort of engaged in local terrorism over local issues.Well, according to the director of the CIA in testimony last week, al Qaeda has changed. It has morphed into what is now, in the words of the CIA director, a movement in which there are local groups that are affiliating and working autonomously with al Qaeda. We have had attacks in Saudi Arabia when there were never attacks before. We had attacks in Morocco when there were never attacks before. And now we have an attack in Spain. It is not implausible that there might be some combination there. But, again, I think we ought to let investigators do their work and let the facts speak for themselves. 

COOPER: And what -- a lot of investigators I've talked to in the past have talked about, in particular those Morocco attacks, the notion of there being some al Qaeda sympathetic group, which may be a wanna-be group and is doing this to prove some kind of point. Of course, it's all at this point just hearsay. I should point out for our viewers, there was a claim of responsibility e-mailed to a newspaper, an Arabic-language newspaper in London. But a lot of people discount that group because they have claimed credit for a lot of things, including the blackouts here in New York last summer. So you don't put much credence in that, do you? 

WALSH: I don't.I think we need to wait and collect a little more evidence. But let me tell you, Anderson, in either case, it's a noteworthy story. Whether it's ETA or whether it's an al Qaeda group or an al Qaeda-linked group or some cooperation between the two, this is a major story that has major implications for our struggle for terrorism. If it's ETA, it means, wow, these guys are escalating at a time when we thought they were in a weaker position. If it's al Qaeda, it means, my gosh, these guys are splintering into little al Qaedas around the globe. And that is troubling as well.

COOPER: And it's not just a major story. It's also a very human story, 192 lives lost, more than 1,000 injured right now. Jim Walsh, appreciate you joining us. Thank you very much. It's good to talk to you. 

WALSH: Thank you, Anderson. Have a good night. 

(CROSSTALK) 

COOPER: Good night to you.We said at the top of the program that there are more questions here than answers. Certainly, that is true, except perhaps where railroad security in this country is concerned. When it comes to taking the train, critics say the answer is in fact chillingly simple about train security. What security, they say. Here's CNN's Jeanne Meserve. 

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

JEANNE MESERVE, CNN CORRESPONDENT (voice over): Could this happen here? 

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Certainly it could. 

MESERVE: The signs at the Amtrak counter say I.D.s are required to buy a ticket. But no one checked mine just hours after the attack in Spain. As for my bag, there was no screening of any type. In many places, there is easy access to rail tracks and often to rail cars, which then travel past major population centers and critical infrastructure. 

SEN. JOSEPH BIDEN (D), DELAWARE: There really is no American train security. 

MESERVE: The rail industry says the sheer numbers makes screening of passengers and baggage impractical. 

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: To put it in perspective, every day, two million Americans use the airline system, and 32 million times a day Americans use our public transit systems. So 16 times more. 

MESERVE: Since 9/11, rail systems have deployed more bomb- sniffing dogs. There are more cameras, more police. The industry also has a 24-hour information sharing and analysis center, or 

ISAC, which receives and shares information on terrorist threats. 

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: And then it's a sift and sort process to try to determine what of that information that's out there about the incident has taken place would be valuable. 

MESERVE: The federal government says one of its accomplishments is sharing timely threat information with the rail industry. But this morning, the ISAC analysts found out about the Madrid train bombing from local news radio. (on camera): The industry faults government for not making rail security a priority. Since 9/11, rail systems around the country have received grant money worth about $100 million. Aviation, in contrast, has received $11. 8 billion. Jeanne Meserve, CNN, Washington. 

(END VIDEOTAPE) 

COOPER: Well, from terror, we move on to politics. March is supposed to come in like a lion, the saying goes, and go out like a lamb. But weather and politicians also defy predictions. When the Bush-Cheney launched its first televised ads last week, they ignited quite a debate over using those images from 9/11. But they were tame on the attack front. They did not even mention Mr. Bush's presumptive opponent, John Kerry. The lamb was fleeting. Today, the lion roared. Here's CNN's White House correspondent John King. 

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE) 

KING (voice-over): At the groundbreaking of a 9/11 memorial on Long Island, 30 months to the day after the terrorist attacks, solemn at this event, but on the attack in new TV ads. In one, Mr. Bush himself suggests Senator Kerry is not up to the terrorism challenge. 

BUSH: We can go forward with confidence, resolve and hope, or we can turn back to the dangerous solution that terrorists are not plotting and outlaw regimes are no threat. 

KING: The second new Bush ad take much sharper aim, saying a Kerry presidency would mean at least $900 billion in new taxes and less resolve on the war in terror. 

NARRATOR: And he wanted to delay defending America until the United Nations approved. John Kerry, wrong on taxes, wrong on defense. 

KING: The Kerry campaign challenged the accuracy of the Bush ads. The senator himself took issue with their tone. 

SEN. JOHN KERRY (D-MA), PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE: There is a Republican attack squad that specializes in trying to destroy people and be negative. I think the president needs to talk about the real priorities of our country. 

KING: The Bush campaign says taxes and terrorism are top priorities, and said if Senator Kerry takes issue with the $900 billion figure, he should spell out just how he would pay for his promises on other health care and other issues. The intensity of the campaign is extraordinary for March. The economy now a daily focus of the slugfest. 

BUSH: Did you hear we're going to repeal the tax cut? That's Washington, D.C. code for I'm fixing to raise your taxes. That's what that means. 

KING: Senator Kerry pounced on word the president's choice to serve a new post of manufacturing was in trouble, suggesting he knew why. 

KERRY: It turns out that the person they choose had cut the work force by 17 percent and built a plant in China. 

KING: Administration officials called that attack unfair, but late Thursday, businessman Tony Raimondo withdrew his name from consideration. 

(END VIDEOTAPE) 

KING: The Bush attack ads represent the earliest date at which an incumbent president has gone on television to attack his opponent. The Kerry campaign plans a response as early as tomorrow morning, Anderson, escalating the tension in what is already a rough-and-tumble campaign, still eight months to the election. 

COOPER: Yes, it's amazing when it is so far away and the tone of it already. These attack ads, as you call them, they're different than these Internet ads which have been running obviously on the Internet, which have a more aggressive tone than the other commercials we've seen on TV, right?

KING: It is more dangerous to go negative on television, because more people see it. Your own supporters tend to look at your Internet ads, as opposed to the mass audience. It is very dangerous to launch negative ads because you run the risk of your own unfavorable ratings going up. So the fact that the president is going on the attack -- his campaign calls them contrast ads, not negative ads. But the fact that he is going on the attack and spending millions to do so, so early is clear proof that the Bush campaign believes it needs to take Senator Kerry down a notch and do so now. 

COOPER: Contrast ads, I like that.All right, John King, thanks very much. Republicans also took John Kerry to task today for calling some of his opponent liars and crooked. Senator Kerry of course made the comments yesterday in a candid moment on the campaign trail. Today, he stood by those words. He also reached a milestone of sorts, call it presumptive-plus. It won't be official until the Democratic Convention, but, for all practical purposes, John Kerry locked in his party's nomination today, a survey by CNN's political unit showing he now has the magic number of delegate votes, 2,162.Here's CNN's Bob Franken. 

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE) 

BOB FRANKEN, CNN NATIONAL CORRESPONDENT (voice-over): John Kerry on the day he clinched his party's nomination, has done something exceedingly bipartisan. He has thrown red meat to Democrats and Republicans alike. 

REP. TOM DELAY (R), MAJORITY LEADER: To call people liars and crooks and, particularly, in thinking that you were off mike, just shows you who the real person is. Not the person that is set up and coifed for a town meeting or speech, but the real person. And I think America got a glimpse of the real John Kerry. 

FRANKEN: The real John Kerry was cruising from one happy meeting of unifying Democrats to another, while Republicans demanded an apology. 

KERRY: I have no intention whatsoever of apologizing for my remarks. I think the -- I think the Republicans need to start talking about the real issues before the country. 

FRANKEN: In fact, the many Democrats who believe their politicians have so often rolled over and played dead in the face of Republican attacks are delighted at all this. 

MICHAEL MEEHAN, SR. ADVISER, KERRY CAMPAIGN: We're going to fight back, absolutely. We're going to spend the next eight months fighting back on that. 

FRANKEN (on camera): It looks like Democrats and Republicans alike are about to heed the challenge and bring it on. Bob Franken, CNN, Washington. 

(END VIDEOTAPE) 

COOPER: Ahead on the program tonight, were the Iraqis spying on America? Is that even possible? That's the allegation, as an American woman is under arrest for being an Iraqi agent. A remarkable story, that.And later, we'll go "On the Rise" with a young author who is making his way to the top one book at a time. From New York, this is NEWSNIGHT. 

(COMMERCIAL BREAK) 

COOPER: Well, it would be hard to imagine Americans spying for Japan after Pearl Harbor or passing secrets to the Soviet Union at the height of the Cold War, but they have, and vice versa. And the reason is simple. Whether it's for love or money or reasons unknown, you can always find someone, even if you're Saddam Hussein and the someone happens to be American. That's allegation, at least right now, the charge leveled today at a woman with connections all across official Washington. Here's CNN's Kelli Arena.

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE) 

KELLI ARENA, CNN JUSTICE CORRESPONDENT (voice-over): Susan Lindauer, a former journalist and congressional aide, was arrested in Tacoma Park, Maryland, for allegedly acting as an Iraqi agent. 

SUSAN LINDAUER, DEFENDANT: I'm an anti-war activist and I'm innocent. 

ARENA: An indictment says Lindauer had repeated contacts with Iraqi intelligence officers in New York and Baghdad between 1999 and 2002 and conspired with two sons of Iraq's former liaison with U.N. weapons inspectors. Lindauer says she was trying to get inspectors back into Iraq. 

LINDAUER: I am very proud and I will very proudly stand by my achievements. ARENA: In January 2003, two months before the U.S. invaded Iraq, prosecutors say she took a letter to the home of a U.S. official saying she had access to Saddam Hussein's regime. Sources tell CNN that official was White House Chief of Staff Andrew Card, Lindauer's second cousin. The White House says Card never met with Lindauer and called the incident very sad. 

LINDAUER: I'm an anti-war activist. 

ARENA: Sources say Card alerted authorities. Then the FBI set up a sting operation. In June, prosecutors say, Lindauer met an undercover FBI agent posing as an agent for Libyan intelligence looking to support resistance groups in postwar Iraq. And near her home in Tacoma Park, they say she followed instructions to leave unspecified documents at dead-drop locations. Neighbors were surprised. 

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: She was a Tacoma Park-type person. They're pretty unique around here. We're a nuclear-free zone, as you know, so a very laid-back, liberal sort of person. 

ARENA: Prosecutors say Iraq paid Lindauer $10,000 for expenses and services. She faces up to 25 years in prison if she's convicted on all charges. 

LINDAUER: This is what democracy is all about. 

ARENA: Kelli Arena, CNN, Washington. 

(END VIDEOTAPE) 

COOPER: A few more stories now from around the world, starting with the late terrorist Abul Abbas. He died in U.S. custody earlier this week. Today, results, an autopsy show he died of heart disease, hardened arteries. His widow and others claim he was assassinated and they're calling the autopsy a whitewash. They're calling for an independent investigation. Haiti next and more violence there, two people killed in a shoot- out between police and a mob in Port-au-Prince. U.S. marines who were patrolling nearby did not take part. Haiti's deposed president, meantime, says he'll fly shortly to Jamaica for a visit. He's been staying in the Central African Republic since fleeing the country nearly two weeks ago And President Clinton's impeachment was, well, nothing like this. Take a look. This is South Korea's National Assembly shortly before lawmakers to impeach the president on a number of charges, including illegal electioneering and incompetence. Ultimately, the measure passed. The president's case now goes before a constitutional court and in the meantime he loses most of his official powers. Coming up on NEWSNIGHT, the struggle continues as the Massachusetts legislature meets again on the gay marriage issue. But has anything really been resolved? Around the world, this is NEWSNIGHT. 

(COMMERCIAL BREAK) 

COOPER: In Massachusetts today, lawmakers tried to unring the bell rung by the commonwealth's highest court on the question of same- sex marriage. Late last year, the court struck down a marriage ban. Earlier this year, legislatures tried and failed to agree on a constitutional amendment. Now, today, with the deadline in the distance and protesters a lot closer than that, they tried again and agreed, not to marriage, yes to civil unions.Here again, CNN's Gary Tuchman. 

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE) 

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: The joint session will come to order. 

TUCHMAN (voice-over): Two hundred Massachusetts state representatives and senators considering whether to amend their state constitution to ban same-sex marriages. 

SHIRLEY OWENS HICKS (D), MASSACHUSETTS STATE REPRESENTATIVE: I believe the Bible and I also believe the American Heritage Dictionary. And each of these books defines marriage as a union between a man and a woman. 

TUCHMAN: That is not the view of the state's highest court, which ruled in November that same-sex marriages in Massachusetts can occur as early as May 17. And that decision proved to be the impetus for this constitutional convention, which gay marriage supporters did not want to see happen. 

THEODORE SPELIOTIS (D), MASSACHUSETTS STATE REPRESENTATIVE: I worked too hard to get this job and to stay in this job to vote in a fashion that tells an entire segment of my population that they're different and they're not accepted. 

TUCHMAN: Thousands of demonstrators on both side of the issue gathered inside and outside the state Capitol. The demonstrators included parochial school students on field trips. 

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: They know that they need a mom and a dad at home, not a dad and a dad. 

TUCHMAN: Families also turned out. 

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: There wouldn't be a vote to take away any other kind of civil right and there shouldn't be a vote to take away gay and lesbian rights. 

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: One man, one woman. Let the people vote it out. It's all about America! 

TUCHMAN: The measure the politicians are considering would ban gay marriage, but allow so-called civil unions. But under Massachusetts law, if it passes, it has to be approved by the legislature again next year and then would have to come up for a statewide referendum in November 2006. 

(END VIDEOTAPE)

TUCHMAN: Which means that, no matter what happens in the state Capitol tonight -- And the legislators are still arguing -- gay couples will be able to start getting married here in Massachusetts in less than 10 weeks and will be able to continue getting married for at least 2 1/2 years. But there is still some confusion. There is an obscure 1913 law that was passed here in Massachusetts that does not allow out-of-state people to get married in Massachusetts if their state says they would not be able to get married back home. So, therefore, since marriage is illegal in 49 other states, it's not clear what will happen if people come from out of state to get married here in Massachusetts. And, Anderson, one thing we want to mention, an apparent coincidence, May 17, 2004, the first day of marriage here in Massachusetts, is the 50th anniversary of the U.S. Supreme Court decision Brown vs. Board of Education, which desegregated the schools -- Anderson.

COOPER: All right, Gary Tuchman, thanks very much for that. Three time zones away, another reversal of fortune. California's Supreme Court ordered the city of San Francisco to stop issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples. That said, the court declined to rule on the central issue, the matter of whether laws banning gay marriage do in fact discriminate. So far, about 3,700 couples have gotten married since the mayor of San Francisco got the whole ball rolling last month.The National Hockey League dropped the hammer on a brutal hitter, suspended Todd Bertuzzi for the rest of the season for the sucker- punch that broke an opponent's neck. There it was. His team, the Vancouver Canucks, has been fined $250,000 and police have launched a criminal investigation into the whole affair. Finally, the Food and Drug Administration today ordered a performance-enhancing drug off the market. Andro, it's called, a steroid precursor. The body turns it into testosterone. But until today, you could buy it without a prescription. Big-name athletes use it to bulk up, apparently. But because it acts like a steroid and comes with many of the same side effects, the government called it too risky to be sold. Still to come on the program, we'll revisit a story we followed for months, the story of a police investigation run amuck in a small Texas town and what the cost has turned out to be. This is NEWSNIGHT. 

(COMMERCIAL BREAK) 

COOPER: Eight years ago, after being accused and cleared of racketeering, Ronald Reagan's former labor secretary was heard to ask, "Where do I go to get my reputation back?" And that was only his reputation.Dozens of people in a small Texas town lost more than that, 45 people in all, most of them African-American. They were arrested, tried and sent to prison on drug charges, largely on the word of a rogue officer. They were freed last year, you may remember, an investigation launched, a lawsuit filed and today, a monetary settlement made public. From Tulia, Texas, CNN's Ed Lavandera. 

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE) 

ED LAVANDERA, CNN CORRESPONDENT (voice-over): Joe Moore spends most days just driving around Tulia, the West Texas town he's called home since 1956. 

JOE MOORE, TULIA RESIDENT: That's what I really enjoy about this town, really. I've been doing it so long. 

LAVANDERA: Since Moore was released from prison last summer, he's been living on a $500-a-month disability payment. But for the four years he wrongly spent in prison, Moore and 44 others are about to receive their apologies in cash, $5 million for the group known as the Tulia 45. 

MOORE: It won't change me. I know. And that's something I know.

LAVANDERA: Kizzie White was also imprisoned in the now infamous Tulia drug sweep that ended up in 10 percent of the town's black population being arrested. She is just happy to be around her two children again and is anxiously awaiting her third child. 

KIZZIE WHITE, TULIA RESIDENT: I'm just trying to live life, because no matter how much money they five me, like I said, it is not bring back those four years. 

LAVANDERA: The $5 million settlement is being paid by the city of Amarillo, one of 29 agencies in a drug task force that supported the work of undercover officer Tom Coleman. The Tulia 45 drug cases were built solely on Coleman's word.But his investigative work has now been thoroughly discredited and he faces charges on perjury charges for his role in those cases. Coleman maintains he did nothing wrong. One of the attorneys representing the Tulia 45 says he's negotiating settlements with the other agencies around the Texas Panhandle. 

JEFF BLACKBURN, ATTORNEY: Everybody that was part of this operation shares in blame for what happened in Tulia, because they had the ability to say no. They had the ability to supervise. They had the duty to regulate what happened there and they didn't do it. 

LAVANDERA: Joe Moore says, no matter how much money he ends up with, it won't change his life much. He plans on spending the rest of his days driving the back roads of Texas enjoying the wide open space of freedom. Ed Lavandera, CNN, Tulia, Texas. 

(END VIDEOTAPE) 

COOPER: Our "Moneyline Roundup" tonight begins with Martha Stewart the brand. Now that Martha Stewart is presumably heading up the river, are sales of her products up the creek, too? So far, answer is no. And so far, the stores that sell Martha's products say they're planning no big changes in buying or merchandising, at least not yet. Signs of life at Ford. The company plans once again to match 401(k) contributions for middle and upper management. Bonuses are also on the way back. Wall Street, on the other hand, had a grim day, big losses in all the major indices, with blue chips leading the way. Ahead on the program tonight, the big business in bodies, human bodies and what you do and don't know about what happens to you when you donate your body to science. 

(COMMERCIAL BREAK) 

COOPER: So, two scandals this week have pulled back the curtain on an intersection of science and commerce that usually escapes public scrutiny, our scrutiny, at least. Both scandals involve the illegal sale of cadavers. Two universities are in the spotlight. At UCLA, an employee and others outside the university are accused of profiting from the sales. At Tulane, the problem is what happened to the bodies after they were given to a third party, a middleman. Both stories began with acts of goodwill, with thousands of people who donate their bodies to science each year. What happens next is, well, less certain. Here's CNN's Christy Feig. 

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE) 

CHRISTY FEIG, CNN MEDICAL CORRESPONDENT (voice-over): About 150 medical schools and other programs across the country actively seek donated bodies. They're used for teaching anatomy to medical students. 

DR. RAY MITCHELL, DEAN, GEORGETOWN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: We learn from our patients, but I think we do begin that sacred journey with a relationship with a cadaver. And I believe it is still -- at this point, I think it has an important role, a critical role in medical education. 

FEIG: Like many schools, the Georgetown University School of Medicine needs about 50 bodies every year and they say they don't usually have a surplus, but cadavers are also needed for tissue banks. 

BOB RIGNEY, AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF TISSUE BANKS: Muscular, skeletal tissue, which would include bones and ligaments and tendons, cardiovascular tissue, which would include heart valves and veins and skin, which is used primary for burn victims. 

FEIG: Altogether, only about 20,000 bodies are donated every year for an estimated one million procedures. Once a family has donated a body, the organization has broad flexibility. It can be used for research or sent to organ clearinghouses. Tissue for banks usually needs to be retrieved within 24 hours, and there's little regulation. Those who rely on donated bodies are concerned recent reports could dry up supplies and some could die waiting for tissue. 

RIGNEY: Some of the surgeries can be postponed. Some can't. For the burn victims who need, you know, human skin to allow them to -- for their bodies to regenerate additional skin, for those who need, you know valve transplants. 

FEIG (on camera): Like organs, it's illegal to sell human tissues for transplant. But nonprofit organizations can charge handling fees. And, in a business where demand far exceeds supplies, those fees can often mean big bucks. Christy Feig, CNN, Washington. 

(END VIDEOTAPE) 

COOPER: Well, the market that exist for human body parts, generally speaking, serves a public good. It supplies life-saving materials. It improves quickly of life for many sick people. There is measurable good that comes from it. But it is also where ethics bump up against economics and where oversight is scant. Dr. Arthur Caplan has spent a lot of time thinking about these issues. He's is the director of the Center For Bioethics at the University of Pennsylvania and joins us now from Philadelphia. Doctor, thanks for being with us. 

DR. ARTHUR CAPLAN, DIRECTOR, CENTER FOR BIOETHICS: Hi, Anderson. 

COOPER: So, you donate your body to science. It goes to one of these 150 or so centers, mostly at universities, and then is it fair, then, just all hell breaks loose, just about anything can happen to it? 

CAPLAN: Well, I think, normally, people are pretty careful and conservative about what they do. And they keep the body at the school. They use it for anatomy class. That's the basic use. Some dentists, some nurses might study it.But if you have sleazy operators down there in the morgue, they may have people approaching them saying, hey, before you send that body up to anatomy class, how about you sell me that knee or sell me that elbow or I'll take a piece of that bone and we can both make some profit here?

COOPER: And these sleazy people trying to purchase these things through these sleazy middlemen, they are whom? They are corporations? They are companies looking for things to do research on? Who are they? 

CAPLAN: Well, the ultimate sort of users are, you have people who need human tissues to demonstrate how particular devices might work. So if I'm making some pins and nails that I need to staple together a back procedure, I might need some spines. You have collectors out there who literally collect human parts. You have some people out there who want to use these body parts for medical research that involves, let's say, weapons research or automobile accidents. So there's a whole array of folks who might use this stuff. 

COOPER: And they're willing to pay for it, obviously.

CAPLAN: They're willing to pay for it. It goes to these sleazy middlemen down 

(CROSSTALK) 

COOPER: Some of the money may go up to the university, if the university has surplus bodies. Once of the guess I've always complained about is, when we take these donations at universities, we should be saying, we'll keep it here, we're not going to send it anywhere else. But in the Tulane down in New Orleans, they did sell some bodies out to the Army. COOPER: Right. And they sold bodies -- and that's sort of a different thing. The sold bodies out to the Army. And the Army then used them to basically blow up. 

CAPLAN: Correct. They were using them to try and understand how land mines -- you might protect your legs against injury from land mines. So they were basically testing them for protective gear. 

COOPER: So, in your opinion, from an ethics standpoint, what's wrong with this, that the families don't know where the bodies end up? 

CAPLAN: You have three basic problems.One, the families don't know what ultimately is going to happen. That's unacceptable. You should always know what research or what purpose your gift is going to be put to. Second, the user should have liability. If you take these bodies, these tissues, these parts, you should be responsible if they were collected with donation. And, third, no one is watching the licensing of the people who come and make the requests. In organ donation, kidneys and hearts, it's a whole formalized system, formal rules. Tissue donation, body parts, no one is kind of regulating, no one is watching who it is that comes in and collects these things. COOPER: So there's not even really a tracking system with some of these 

(CROSSTALK) 

CAPLAN: There isn't. And, again, if we have hearts and livers and lungs, we know where they go, very tightly regulated system. We should be doing the same thing for the cadavers. 

COOPER: And, of course, the real -- not the real, but one of the many dangers of this is that then people hear these stories, they see this report, and then they think, well, I don't want to end being blown up by the military. I'm not going to donate my body to science. 

CAPLAN: And I want to be clear. When it comes to hearts, livers, kidneys, the organs that we hear about the most, that system is tightly regulated. There are no scandals there. You sign that donor card or check off your driver's license, you're going to have that organ handled in a responsible way.It's this sort of tissue, corpse, cadaver side that needs the regulation. We have got it done for organs. There's no reason at all we can't extend that system out to cadavers. 

COOPER: And so you're saying the primary responsibility, I guess it really should be shared by the universities who want to track these things, but also by people who are trying to get these things from the universities. 

CAPLAN: Well, if a company needs a knee because it needs to teach doctors how to do a procedure on a knee or a dental company wants to do tooth implants and needs jaws to practice on, OK, as long as you understand that that is what your body might be used for and you consent to that, that's great. If they get these things on the black market or off the books, then I think they should be responsible. We don't let sneaker companies get away with saying, hey, there is child labor, but we didn't know about it. We hold them responsible for making sure that, if they use cheap labor overseas, they have got to be accountable. The same thing should be true for these companies that use cadaver body parts.

COOPER: All right, Dr. Arthur Caplan, appreciate you joining us. Thanks.

(CROSSTALK) 

CAPLAN: My pleasure. 

COOPER: Still ahead on NEWSNIGHT, we'll go "On the Rise" and meet a young man making his mark in the publishing world in quite a way. Stay with us. 

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

COOPER: We sometimes hear about struggling musicians who are discovered while performing in the subway. A record producer happens along and a recording contract soon follows. This is wrinkle on that fairy tale ending. The star isn't a musician, but hip-hop is his muse. He wrote a novel about it, one of the first hip-hop novels ever published. But how it got published and how this 24-year-old writer came to be "On the Rise" is not the coolest part of the story. This is where the subway comes in. 

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE) 

HERU PTAH, AUTHOR, "A HIP-HOP STORY": Now, surprisingly, Myra Pute (ph) preceded me and she already wanted to meet the man behind the poetry. This is my book right here. It's called "A Hip-Hop Story," first novel. My name is Heru Ptah. And I am the author of the great book "A Hip-Hop Story."

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: After the book came out, he started hitting the trains with it. He sold over 10,000 copies of the book on the subway. 

PTAH: I was 21 when I started writing "A Hip-Hop Story." It was inspired by "West Side Story," hence the title.But instead of rivaling gangs, we have rivaling hip-hop camps.Jenessy (ph) altered the path and rode the hip-hop tide, as rivaling labels had been doing for years before. Harold Incron (ph) and Tojano (ph), they had, to their discredit, previously stayed far away from it.My interest in hip-hop is that I'm a child of hip-hop. I'm born into their generation of music. Now, one man's madman is another's man martyr. But murder is murder. Slaughter is slaughter.This book right here is the original "Hip-Hop Story," which I self-published. This is a book that I laid out myself, mostly edited myself. I only had $100 left to my name after I published and printed "Hip-Hop" and really doubts of being broke. I was like, you know what? I'm just going to hit the trains. And I just went out there and I just sold. On the trains, I sold a little bit over 10,000 books. I would get on the train and I would just be like, yo, you know, young writer recently wrote and published my first novel. It's "A Hip-Hop Story." It's hottest book in the city right now. Six months from now, it's No. 1 in the country, one year from now, No. 1 in the world. You see me here today. Tomorrow, you see me on "Oprah."It was on one of those days I got the A-train in the last car, and I gave my spiel. And the person who bought the last copy was a director of publisher of MTV Books.

 JACOB HOYE, DIRECTOR OF PUBLISHING, MTV BOOKS: It was his charisma. It was his rap, essentially. I was really impressed. So I said, well, let me check out a copy. And the next morning, I came in and I said, we've got to do this book. Whatever we do, we've got to publish this book. 

PTAH: You can silence the lambs, but you can't step to a god. I've been lecturing before Lecter. 

HOYE: It's doing great. We're in our third printing. We're over 20,000 copies shipped, which, for a first novel in today's marketplace is tremendous. 

PTAH: There's a lot of talk right now for a "Hip-Hop" movie. Some very big people are really interested. I never learned to dream small, so why not? I mean, shoot, I was just selling on the train a year ago, so who knows what I'll be doing next year. 

(END VIDEOTAPE) 

COOPER: Let's hope Oprah is listening. Ahead on the program, we're going to update you on our top story and preview tomorrow. We'll be right back. 

(COMMERCIAL BREAK) 

COOPER: Here's a quick look at our top story.In Spain, the horrible task of identifying nearly 200 bodies continues in the wake of this morning's devastating terrorist attack, 10 explosions on three trains during Madrid's early morning commute. The bombs were in backpacks. It is the worst terror attack in Spain's history, the worst in all Europe since the bombing of Flight 103 over Lockerbie, Scotland. Spanish officials believe the chief suspect is a Spanish terror group, but many questions remain about that. Tomorrow on NEWSNIGHT, Aaron Brown reports live from Qatar, his first report from the region nearly a year after the war in Iraq. He will be at the U.S. military command center, the brains of the invasion where everything came together. That is tomorrow. And before we go, here's Bill Hemmer with a look at what's coming up tomorrow on "AMERICAN MORNING."

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP) 

BILL HEMMER, CNN ANCHOR: Anderson, thank you. Tomorrow here on "AMERICAN MORNING," a strange case of a man trying to prove his innocence. He has long believed he was responsible for the driving death of a friend. Now comes a law student with a hunch to investigate. Was the guilty man wrong? The student tells us how she hopes a convicted man may walk free. We'll check it out tomorrow on a Friday edition of "AMERICAN MORNING," 7:00 a.m. Eastern time. Hope to see you then -- Anderson.

(END VIDEO CLIP) 

COOPER: Bill, thanks very much.That's NEWSNIGHT for tonight. Thanks for watching.Tomorrow, Aaron Brown, as we said, begins his series of reports from the Middle East, as we approach the first anniversary of the start of the Iraq war. It is hard to believe it has nearly been a year. I'm Anderson Cooper. Thanks for joining me. I hope you will join me tomorrow at 7:00 p.m. Eastern time for "ANDERSON COOPER 360." Up next for most of you, my good friend and colleague Lou Dobbs.Good night.

TO ORDER A VIDEO OF THIS TRANSCRIPT, PLEASE CALL 800-CNN-NEWS OR USE OUR SECURE ONLINE ORDER FORM LOCATED AT www.fdch.com

Wednesday, March 10, 2004

Bush Speaks in Ohio; Five British Terror Suspects Freed Without Charges After 2 Years in Camp X-Ray

Bush Speaks in Ohio; Five British Terror Suspects Freed Without Charges After 2 Years in Camp X-Ray

Aired March 10, 2004 - 22:00 ET

THIS IS A RUSH TRANSCRIPT. THIS COPY MAY NOT BE IN ITS FINAL FORM AND MAY BE UPDATED.

ANDERSON COOPER, CNN ANCHOR: And good evening to you. I'm Anderson Cooper in for Aaron Brown who is on assignment in the Middle East.The Rust Belt state of Ohio is gold in presidential politics. No Republican has ever won the White House without carrying Ohio and this year that means making a convincing case on the economy.Unemployment in the state is higher than the national average and more than 100,000 manufacturing jobs have been lost in the last four years. So, you could say Mr. Bush was facing a tough crowd when he arrived in Ohio today, the state he won by just four percentage points four years ago.The challenge of Ohio is where the whip begins. CNN's John King starts us off with a headline -- John.

JOHN KING, CNN SR. WHITE HOUSE CORRESPONDENT: Anderson, the president acknowledged tough times in Ohio and tough emotions about the economy across the industrial heartland today but he also was quite defiant. He said those who criticize his trade policies are wrong, Mr. Bush also saying what his critics propose is "a recipe for economic disaster" -- Anderson.

COOPER: All right, back to you shortly John.Next to Senator Kerry who is slugging away and doing a little trash talking to if you ask the opposition. CNN's Bob Franken on that for us tonight, Bob a headline.

BOB FRANKEN, CNN NATIONAL CORRESPONDENT: And, Anderson, the Bush campaign is demanding that Kerry apologize, whatever for, well we'll just tell you in a moment.

COOPER: All right. On to London where five inmates of the prison camp in Guantanamo Bay are home and apparently home free as well, CNN's Robyn Curnow with a story tonight and a headline -- Robyn.

ROBYN CURNOW, CNN CORRESPONDENT: That's right, Anderson. Five British terror suspects freed without charge after two years in Camp X-Ray -- back to you.

COOPER: Thanks, Robyn. Finally, Vancouver, hockey and repercussions from an especially brutal moment on the ice, CNN's Kimberly Osias is covering that tonight, Kimberly a headline from you.

KIMBERLY OSIAS, CNN CORRESPONDENT: Fighting in ice hockey is part of the game and why pay to see it but now it may have gone too far -- Anderson.

COOPER: There is fighting and then there is fighting. Kimberly thanks. Back to you and the rest shortly.Also ahead tonight on the program what's with the fixation on reality shows around here, here, there and everywhere. Does it have something to do with the villains perhaps? We'll ask the producer of "Fear Factor." He ought to know.And later, another of our "Look at it This Way" segments on still photography, tonight actor Jeff Bridges shows us what he's been doing for decades off camera, all that to come in the hour ahead.We begin with the economy stupid. It is depending on the expert you ask, either on the mend, in a rut, both or well neither. Ask a political strategist, however, and you'll get a much simpler answer. It is key, both the reality of it and the perception, key in Michigan, in Missouri, in Pennsylvania and Ohio where the president spent some time today.Here again CNN's John King.

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

KING (voice-over): Thermagon is a Cleveland high tech company that exports 60 percent of its products. This presidential visit designed to make the point trade is part of the solution for a struggling jobs market not the problem.


GEORGE W. BUSH, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES: Listen, the best product on any shelf anywhere in the world says "made in the USA." 

KING: The president didn't name names but suggests critics who blame him for manufacturing jobs lost to cheap overseas labor markets will do the economy a lot more harm than good.BUSH: That old policy of tax and spend is the enemy of job creation. The old policy of economic isolationism is a recipe for economic disaster.KING: Mr. Bush's success in making this case could determine whether he has a job come January. Eight-five percent of Americans in a new CNN poll say keeping American jobs from going overseas will be important in their choice for president.Democrat John Kerry supported the North American Free Trade Agreement and a similar pact with China but in appealing for union support, Senator Kerry now promises if elected to review all major trade deals. 

SEN. JOHN KERRY (D), PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE: George Bush thinks exporting our jobs is good economic policy. I believe that creating jobs here in America, keeping good jobs here and exporting goods is good for our economy.

KING: No Republican has ever won the White House without carrying Ohio, one of the big industrial states where the debate over trade and outsourcing is loudest. Ohio's unemployment rate if 6.2 percent and the state has lost more than 160,000 manufacturing jobs during the Bush presidency.Mr. Bush says the pain would have been a lot worse if not for his push for more trade and big tax cuts and he says those who blame trade for tough times ignore reality.Ninety-five percent of the world's consumers live outside the United States. One in five U.S. manufacturing jobs depends on exports and 6.4 million Americans work for foreign companies.

BUSH: Economic isolationism would lead to retaliation from abroad and put many of those jobs at risk.

(END VIDEOTAPE)

KING: You might remember more than five months ago on Labor Day, the president promised to name an administration manufacturing czar. The White House says it is now poised to make that appointment. A Nebraska businessman is the front runner for that post. Senator Kerry tonight saying though that's too little too late, in his words one new government bureaucrat, Anderson, won't make up for two and a half million lost manufacturing jobs.

COOPER: John, the Democrats of course point out President Bush's support for tariffs on steel. I guess the White House is not talking about that today.

KING: No, the White House is not and you see the flurry of e- mails back and forth between the campaigns. Neither President Bush's record or Senator Kerry's record is entirely consistent on this issue. Senator Kerry has voted for trade deals. Now he says he would look at them. President Bush has been mostly a free trader but, you're exactly right, under political pressure he did impose temporary tariffs on steel. This is a debate that is going to continue and, if you look at how close this election appears to be right now, it will be decided in those big industrial states, Ohio, Illinois, Pennsylvania and Michigan, more of this in the weeks and months ahead.

COOPER: Yes, John, it's a little bit off topic. Yesterday, Kerry was talking about proposing debates, issue oriented debates, you know, one on each issue in various states. Did the White House respond at all to that? 

KING: The White House has not responded officially. The Bush campaigns says it will think about debates down the road a little bit. The incumbent, of course, has a lot of leverage when it comes to scheduling the debates. Do not look for the president to agree to monthly debates at all. Look for the negotiations around the conventions on maybe two or three debates in the fall but, again, that position will go back and forth and back and forth, probably mostly depending on the polls.

COOPER: Right. It's a game John Kerry knows well. He didn't debate Edwards at all so he's familiar with it I'm sure.

KING: That's right.

COOPER: All right, John King thanks at the White House.On now to the opposition, again today, as John King mentioned in his report, Senator Kerry laid into the president's handling of the economy and more. He seems to be taking a page from the post Dukakis playbook which reads: "Don't wait for your opponent to define you and swing back when swung upon."It's been making for plenty of sound bytes and today created one of those unscripted moments that people talk about the next day or, in this case, the same evening.Here's CNN's Bob Franken.

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

FRANKEN (voice-over): John Kerry is clearly not pulling any punches about what his aides call the Bush campaign's deceit.

KERRY: These guys are the most crooked, you know, lying group that I've ever seen.

FRANKEN: This is just the most recent Kerry attack this month on foreign policy.

KERRY: I think George Bush has run the most arrogant, inept, reckless and ideological foreign policy in the modern history of our country.

FRANKEN: On the famous photo op.

KERRY: That George Bush thought he could just play dress-up on an aircraft carrier.

FRANKEN: On the president's plan for a Mars mission.

KERRY: Send Bush to Mars. There's another idea.

FRANKEN: On the issues, particularly the economy, Kerry believes he has the president on the defensive. 

KERRY: Ladies and gentlemen, it's got to be getting lonely for George Bush. It seems he's the last person left in America who actually believe his failed policies will ever work.

(END VIDEOTAPE)

FRANKEN: Kerry met with Howard Dean this afternoon and will get together with John Edwards tomorrow to coordinate the Democratic message, the Democratic assault -- Anderson.

COOPER: It does seem like that. All right, Bob. It was interesting seeing that video where he actually made the comments about the sort of crooked liars or lying as he called them. It looked like, I guess people were taking his mike off. Was it clear whether he intended that to go out over his microphone? Was that a mistake?

FRANKEN: This is not an amateur. I don't know. It doesn't look like it was a mistake. He knew he had an ear piece on. You could see that he was fumbling with it. I don't think that there is any effort here to try and soft peddle things. I believe the Democrats believe that their constituency is so strongly against President Bush that it's probably not a bad idea to try and keep the heat pretty intense.

COOPER: And it's going to get must more intense as the weeks and months progress. All right, Bob Franken thanks a lot.Not all the swings are coming from across the political divide, we should point out, and some are narrowly focused. Tomorrow, a group that supported President Bush four years ago will launch the centerpiece of a $1 million ad campaign attacking the constitutional amendment to ban same-sex marriage, which Mr. Bush has backed, the ad sponsored the Log Cabin Republicans, the ad itself unprecedented. Here's CNN's Judy Woodruff.

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

DICK CHENEY, VICE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES: The fact of the matter is we live in a free society and freedom means freedom for everybody.

JUDY WOODRUFF, CNN ANCHOR (voice-over): The first television commercial ever from the nation's largest organization of gay Republicans, the Log Cabin Club, a million dollar campaign knocking a proposed constitutional amendment to ban same-sex marriage, the footage, Dick Cheney, weighing in at the 2000 vice presidential debate.

CHENEY: I think different states are likely to come to different conclusions and that's appropriate. I don't think there should necessarily be a federal policy in this area.

WOODRUFF: A view not shared today by the president.

BUSH: I call upon the Congress to promptly pass and to send to the states for ratification an amendment to our Constitution defining and protecting marriage as a union of a man and woman as husband and wife.

WOODRUFF: The Log Cabin Republicans who supported George W. Bush take pains not to mention him in their ad but they say they gave the White House fair warning.

PATRICK GUERRIERO, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, LOG CABIN REPUBLICANS: We made it clear to them though that if they were going to play politics, play political football with the American Constitution, we would have to react, to react strongly and that is what we've done.

WOODRUFF: From team Bush a tempered response: "We respect the differences of opinion in the Republican Party and we feel that during this election, the Republicans will unite behind the president on the big issues facing this country," and from the voice on the ad a show of solidarity.

CHENEY: He makes the decisions. He sets policy for the administration and I support him and the administration.

WOODRUFF: Where does that leave the Log Cabin Republicans, on the air with their ad and promising to reevaluate their support for President Bush at their convention in August.Judy Woodruff, CNN, Washington.

(END VIDEOTAPE)

COOPER: Still ahead tonight on the program steroids in sports, can the Congress really do anything about it?And in a violent sport, hockey, a shockingly violent attack, one that left a player hospitalized and could send another to jail.And later on, we'll get to the bottom of why the people we really love on reality shows are the ones we hate.From New York this is NEWSNIGHT.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

COOPER: Away from the campaign trail today, Republicans and Democrats are very much on the same page in a Senate hearing on the doping scandal in professional sports. Senators from both sides of the aisles hammered Major League Baseball and it's players' union for not cracking down on steroid abuse. They also threatened congressional action.CNN's Joe Johns has details.

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

JOE JOHNS, CNN CONGRESSIONAL CORRESPONDENT (voice-over): Major League Baseball players now in spring training, also now on notice from Congress, get tougher on steroids. The head of the players association got an earful at this hearing.

SEN. JOHN MCCAIN (R), ARIZONA: I can tell you and your players that you represent the status quo is not acceptable.

JOHNS: The heat is on baseball. Five to seven percent of tests on players last year came back positive for steroid use. Superstar Barry Bonds' personal trainer was charged with supplying steroids to athletes. Bonds denies using steroids. The Baseball Players Association has agreed to once a year random testing but says athletes still have rights.

DONALD FEHR, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, MAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL PLAYERS ASSOCIATION: We don't treat it lightly. We don't treat lightly the notion of searches without cause.

JOHNS: And the players also say random testing is an issue of privacy but not everyone agrees.

SEN. BYRON DORGAN (D), NORTH DAKOTA: The taking of steroids in private is designed specifically to affect your performance in public, specifically for that. There cannot possibly be a privacy issue here in my judgment.

JOHNS: Not all performance enhancing substances are illegal. Some are even available over the counter.

FEHR: You can't expect professional athletes to suggest that they somehow are different than anyone else and they can't go into a store and buy something that anyone else can buy.

JOHNS: But the commissioner of baseball says all should be banned.

BUD SELIG, MAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL COMMISSIONER: Regardless of whether the substances are categorized as steroids or nutritional supplements.

JOHNS (on camera): A proposal to crack down on some of those substances is gaining momentum here but, in the end, Congress may be able to do little more than shine a light on the problem.Joe Johns, CNN, Capitol Hill.

(END VIDEOTAPE)

COOPER: On to another athlete in trouble. Safe to say hockey is the alpha dog of sports. No one really expects it to be tame. It pretty much defines contact sport. But contact is different from criminal assault, which brings us to the Vancouver Canucks and the Colorado Avalanche. What happened on the ice Monday night may have been revenge for rough play in an earlier game between the two teams but whatever it was, it has set off a storm and called into question a defining feature of the sport.Here's CNN's Kimberly Osias.

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE) 

OSIAS (voice-over): It was a full on ambush in the third period, a sucker punch to the head from behind, the Canuck 6'3", 245-pound Todd Bertuzzi jumped rookie Avalance forward Steve Moore forcing him face first into the ice.

MELODY ESCALLIER, CANADIAN RESIDENT: I was absolutely disgusted. I thought it was no better than a mugging actually.

OSIAS: Moore is in a Vancouver hospital with a broken neck, cuts on his face and a concussion. He'll miss the rest of the season. The severity of the attacks send shockwaves through the entire hockey community.

STEVE KONGWALCHUCK, COLORADO AVALANCHE PLAYER: It happens from time to time because injuries are part of the game but not that way. That's the hard part, not that severe.

OSIAS: Bertuzzi's career is on hold while the NHL debates his future. An announcement will be made at 9:00 Eastern time Thursday morning. Vancouver police are investigating. The all-star forward could face criminal charges. The last time there was such a highly publicized incident in hockey, Bertuzzi himself spoke out against violence on the ice.

TODD BERTUZZI, VANCOUVER CANUCKS FORWARD: It's disgusting what happened and it's unfortunate and the league's got to do something about it.

OSIAS: He was referring to this game in February of 2000 when Boston Bruins tough guy Marty McSorley whacked Canuck player Donald Brashear with his stick. McSorley was convicted in Canada of assault with a weapon but served no jail time. The league suspended him for a year and he never returned.

WAYNE BROWN, HOCKEY FAN: It put a bad eye on hockey right now. People don't want to see this kind of stuff. Fighting is a part of what hockey is and I don't think they'll ever get rid of that.

(END VIDEOTAPE)OSIAS: Todd Bertuzzi just had a press conference. Let's take a listen to what he had to say.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

BERTUZZI: To the fans of hockey and the fans of Vancouver, for the kids that watch this game I'm truly sorry. I don't play the game that way. I'm not a mean spirited person and I'm sorry for what happened.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

OSIAS: He also apologized to Steve Moore, to Moore's family and the entire Canuck organization -- Anderson.

COOPER: So, Kimberly, OK so he cried and he apologized. Did he explain?

OSIAS: Well, he didn't really offer a full explanation and obviously more will be coming to the fore as the days and the investigation continue.

COOPER: All right, Kimberly Osias thanks very much.A couple other stories making news tonight, in Virginia a judge today imposed the sentence the jury recommended for convicted sniper Lee Boyd Malvo, life in prison without parole. Mr. Malvo, now 19, was found guilty of course of capital murder and other charges in the death of an FBI analyst, one of just ten people killed and three wounded in the sniper attack that terrorized the Washington, D.C. area in the fall of 2002. It doesn't feel so long ago.In Texas, a former university professor who set off a bioterrorism scare in January, 2003 was sentenced to two years in prison and fined $15,000. The scare began when he reported 30 vials of plague bacteria missing from his lab at Texas Tech. Later he said he had accidentally destroyed the samples, in the trial said he had no clear memory of doing so.Coming up on NEWSNIGHT freedom for some detainees as the British let five men who had been held at Guantanamo go free.From NEWSNIGHT -- this is NEWSNIGHT from New York, be right back.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

COOPER: Well not more than a day after five Britons returned home from the detention camp at Guantanamo Bay all five are now apparently free and clear, quite a reversal from the worst of the worst to free to go and, as before, it is raising a lot of questions tonight.So we go back to London and CNN's Robyn Curnow for details -- Robyn.

CURNOW: Hi there, Anderson.Well, you're right. One day after they returned home after two years at Camp X-Ray in Cuba the final three British terror suspects have been released by anti-terror police here in Britain without charge. Earlier a fourth man was also released without charge.Now they had been arrested when they arrived home on Tuesday by anti-terror police under Britain's terrorism act. They could have been held for 14 days without being charged but instead they are now free men after just one day in police custody. A fifth man who was part of that group was detained but not arrested when they arrived home.Now all five men had been released by U.S. officials from Guantanamo Bay because they were considered low risk. British authorities obviously concurring with that saying these men are no longer terror suspects.But, Anderson, as they make their way home tonight I'm sure many people in the local communities have mixed feelings, many people saying that they welcome these young men back saying they've always believed they were innocent.However, other people in the local communities here in Britain saying that there's a big question mark over these men's heads. Just what were they doing in Afghanistan in the first place -- Anderson.

COOPER: Robyn, is there any sense that they will actually make public statements? I mean you say they're on their way home now. Do you know where they're going or when they will appear?

CURNOW: Police have said that they are escorting the men to locations of their choice at the moment so there is likely to be a great homecoming for these men after two years of not seeing their family.Obviously, we also know that there is a chance that they'll be selling their stories to the national press. There's also the chance that they'll be thinking compensation from the U.S. and U.K. authorities. They say they were treated inhumanely and human rights lawyers here say that they could be awarded huge sums of money if they were found to have been imprisoned falsely -- Anderson.

COOPER: And there are still a number of British subjects being held at Guantanamo, am I correct in that?

CURNOW: You are correct in that, Anderson. There are four men still being held in Guantanamo Bay and their status is at the moment up to the U.S. authorities and it looks as if they will be charged or at least tried under the U.S. legal system at the moment.

COOPER: And how much attention are those four who are still in custody receiving in Great Britain? I understand their families have sort of come forward and say look they were just sort of caught up in events not of their choosing. The U.S. says something different.

CURNOW: There's been a huge public debate here in Britain about the fate of these men, many people saying that they've been treated inhumanely and against international law and, of course, the focus in the last few days, the last few weeks has been on these five men who were to be released. Now, of course, the focus shifts to the remaining four and their fate.

COOPER: All right, Robyn Curnow thanks very much from England, appreciate it.The commander of the military's Southern Command today said U.S. Marines will be taking a more active role in trying to tamp down the violence in Haiti, no easy job that. Since Sunday they've shot and killed four Haitians, two of whom were killed today after opening fire on the prime minister's home in Port-au-Prince, not a good idea, rough work. And, in addition to trying to keep the peace there's the very naughty problem of reconstituting a government. Into that role today stepped a former government official and expatriate who has certainly got his work cut out for him.Here's CNN's Harris Whitbeck.

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

HARRIS WHITBECK, CNN CORRESPONDENT (voice-over): Gerard Latortue arrived in Port-au-Prince to take on what may well be the toughest job in the country. The former diplomat and international business consultant left his home in Florida to return to the place he was born.Designated as Haiti's provisional prime minister, he will try to end the bloodshed. Since Haiti's President Jean-Bertrand Aristide left the country February 29th, reprisal killings have racked the population.

GERARD LATORTUE, PROVISIONAL PRIME MINISTER OF HAITI: The top priority would be to 

(UNINTELLIGIBLE) 

security problem and I would like to see the foreign troops here will cooperate with the national police to help us, to help us disarm all those who have illegal arms in their hands.

WHITBECK: Latortue's got the help of a multinational interim force. U.S. Marines and the Haitian Police have been encouraging civilians to turn in their weapons, so far, however, no luck.

CHARLES GURGANUS, USMC: Nothing, we haven't found any. We have not found any.

WHITBECK: But the U.S. Southern Command said Marines would soon start looking for arms caches stored in private buildings in Port-au- Prince. Finding them will be difficult. U.N. officials say tens of thousands of weapons are floating around.And heavily armed rebel groups that appeared shortly before Aristide's departure say they will only lay down their weapons if the international force protects civilians from the violence.The new prime ministers says while he makes security a priority he will also look into reconstituting the Haitian Army that was disbanded by Aristide in 1995.

(END VIDEOTAPE)

WHITBECK: And that could spark even more fear among at least part of the population. The Haitian Army was responsible for massive human rights violations and many of its victims were Aristide supporters -- Anderson.

COOPER: Harris, how bad or good is the security right now, at least in Port-au-Prince where you are? Can you travel around? I mean can you go to City Soleil? Can you got to some of these areas? Are there police on the street or Marines?

WHITBECK: The presence of police and Marines is pretty spotty, Anderson. 

(UNINTELLIGIBLE) 

Soleil is pretty much off limits. You know we have been warned that if we go there we could get into trouble. As you know that's a very, very large slum, a lot of tension there, a lot of Aristide supporters there, so we have to be very careful.Now there is another demonstration that has been slated for tomorrow morning. Now there are a lot of people taking a close look at that because they don't want a repeat of what happened last Sunday when a demonstration in front of the presidential palace was fired upon.The fact that there's a new prime minister in town and that he will be taking office tomorrow has some people concerned that those who are against his taking office, those who support Aristide, might try to take some sort of action on the street, so it's still a bit dicey here -- Anderson.

COOPER: And, Harris, I mean we saw in your report some people walking around with AK-47s, automatic weapons. Some of the people you described as some of the rebels. I mean are they visible on the street on a daily basis walking around with guns or is it more sort of they're behind closed doors just kind of waiting?

WHITBECK: They're not as visible as they had been before the multinational interim force came in but there are a lot of weapons on the street. As you know, Anderson, you've been here a lot, you know there are tens of thousands of weapons literally in the hands of many civilians here and people who aren't afraid to use those weapons.So, what the U.S. Marines and other members of the multinational force are going to try to do now is go beyond simply asking people to turn in their weapons. They're actually going to start going into some of the neighborhoods where they believe that weapons might be stored.

COOPER: It's history repeating itself. That was done back in 1994. All right, Harris Whitbeck, thanks very much. Stay safe. A couple more items from around the world before we take a break, both a bit more hopeful than the goings-on in Haiti. First stop, Lahore, Pakistan, and the arrival of India's cricket team -- yes, cricket team, another sign of a thaw in relations between the countries, a small one, perhaps. But then again, cricket fans take it very seriously. And there are a lot of them in both countries and around the world, for that matter. They'll meet on the pitch on Saturday, tight security and all. And in Japan, they're now ready for the moment when Vaudeville rhinos go bad. This is not a reality show. After training for months using Vaudeville horses, officials gave the OK for the real thing, or the fake real thing, or the real fake thing. Several people were gored, but they managed to get the situation under control by pretending to use a stun gun on the guy playing the back two legs. All right, we have had our fun. It's a earthquake drill at the Tokyo Zoo, in case a real rhino ever gets out of control. Let's hope it doesn't. Still to come on NEWSNIGHT, who is telling the truth? The Republicans argue the economy is much better, while the Democrats say things are still terrible. Can both be right? We'll try to get some answer when we return.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK) 

COOPER: Woman discovers fingertip in salad? All right, more now on the economy. The lumpy recovery, the exporting of America, however you put it, almost certain to be the issue one in the campaign, it seems, even with troops abroad and dangers here at home. With us tonight to sort it all out is James Surowiecki, who writes about business markets and more for "The New Yorker" magazine. Good to see you. Thanks for being with us.

JAMES SUROWIECKI, "THE NEW YORKER": Thanks for having me on.

COOPER: How is the economy doing? Kind of a stupid question. But depending on whom you ask, you get different answers. 

SUROWIECKI: Well, it's really a mixed bag. On the one hand, economic growth has been very strong over the last, let's say nine months. Two quarters ago, it was awesome. It was 2.8 percent, GDP growth. But employment is basically flat. There have been essentially almost no jobs created. 

(CROSSTALK) 

COOPER: Right, 21,000 in the last month. 

SUROWIECKI: In the last month. 

COOPER: Right. 

SUROWIECKI: And the economy really needs to create somewhere between 150,000 and 200,000 jobs just to keep up with population growth and to keep the same number of people employed. 

COOPER: And why is that? Is there one reason or I would assume it's a multitude? 

SUROWIECKI: It's a multitude of reasons, I think. I think one of the big reasons, obviously, is that this whole thing started with the bubble of the late '90s. So employment was probably higher than it would normally have been, because there were a lot of businesses that got started because...

COOPER: A lot of venture capital firms putting money into 

(CROSSTALK) 

SUROWIECKI: There was lot of money that was cheap, and so people started businesses. A lot of those are gone. Businesses hired a lot of people that they no longer have business for. But I think part of it also is that businesses are very cautious and they remain very cautious. And they have gotten a lot quicker than in the past at firing people when the economy starts to slow down. And they have gotten a lot slower about hiring people when the economy starts to pick back up. 

COOPER: Which I guess there's an argument that that -- some people I guess would argue that's good for the economy, that businesses are sort of on top of things? 

(CROSSTALK) 

SUROWIECKI: Right. And it's good in the since that what it means is that everybody is working at pretty much their full capacity, if you will, that workers are much more productive than they've ever been. The other amazing thing about the recovery has been that productivity is incredibly high. And there really has been a real shift in productivity growth. And that's really important for the economy. 

COOPER: So the situation you describe is one where both the Republicans and Democrats can be describing the economy in completely divergent ways and yet both sort of be accurate in some ways. 

SUROWIECKI: In some ways, yes.But I do think that employment question, there's one other aspect that we haven't really talked about. And that is that there probably was not enough done to spur demand and to get the economy jump-started when it went into recession. There are certain things -- the Federal Reserve has been fantastic. It slashed interest rates and has kept interest rates incredibly low. As you know, if you want to take out a home equity loan...

COOPER: Or refinance.

SUROWIECKI: Or refinance, it's crazy how they're basically giving money away. 

COOPER: And that has spurred a lot -- just the whole refinancing alone has spurred parts of the economy 

(CROSSTALK) 

SUROWIECKI: Absolutely. It's certainly kept people buying in terms of customer goods. But it's also -- home construction has been up. Home buying is up, all this kind of stuff.But the other thing you can do, the government can do, is fiscal policy. And there, I think, we really have done a pretty bad job. 

COOPER: But President Bush says that the tax cuts have spurred the economy. 

SUROWIECKI: Right. I think obviously any tax cut in general has a good -- has a less than -- it's not going to have a negative effect. The problem was that I think the Bush tax cuts were primarily long-term tax cuts. They're mostly back-loaded, so most of the Bush tax cuts are going to come in after like 2006. 

COOPER: Do you agree with John Kerry who says they impacted more for richer people? 

SUROWIECKI: Well, we certainly know they impacted more for richer people. That's just -- the numbers clearly bear that out. And the reason that matters is just that rich people are more likely to take that money and invest it. That's good for the economy in the long term. But in terms of giving the economy a kind of kick in the pants, it doesn't really do that. 

COOPER: But how much can a president really do to spur an economy? You can talk about it. You can kind of massage it. You can kind put ointment on it. 

SUROWIECKI: Sure.

COOPER: But can you really fix it? 

SUROWIECKI: No. I think it's unrealistic to expect a president to be fully responsible. On the other hand, let's face it. If job growth were fantastic, we know the administration would be claiming credit. 

COOPER: You think?

SUROWIECKI: No doubt.

(LAUGHTER) 

SUROWIECKI: And I do think that the administration, they did have this window, say, from 2001 to 2002, when the economy went into recession, and the choice to do certain things that they might have done. And, instead, they chose to follow what I think was a less successful tack, which was these long-term tax cuts targeted primarily at the very wealthy. 

COOPER: And the economy, I guess, what, the hope now that it just rights itself?

SUROWIECKI: Yes, I think that's basically what -- if you listened to Bush's speech today -- he gave a speech in Ohio. And if you listened to it, a lot of what he said about the economy, that the American economy is -- that productivity growth is good and that free trade is good, all those things I think are right. But he can't really make a case for his own economic policy, because we've lost 2.4 million jobs since he came into office. And whether he's responsible for that or not, what we know is that he's not done the job to fix it, basically.

COOPER: All right, we'll leave it there. James Surowiecki, thanks very much. 

SUROWIECKI: Thank for having me on. 

(CROSSTALK) 

COOPER: Enjoy your writing.

SUROWIECKI: Thanks.

COOPER: Well, a few more business items before we go to break in our "Moneyline Roundup" tonight. Spam starts it off. Leading Internet providers today teamed up to fight it. Microsoft, EarthLink, AOL and others jointly filing federal lawsuits against spammers in a number of states. This is the first time competitors have gotten together to take advantage of new federal legislation that makes it easier to go after spammers; $43 billion, container ships, that is the latest monthly total trade deficit between the United States and rest of the world. It is also the largest such deficit on record. That said, the number had little effect on markets. They were already in the tank. For the Dow, which got dinged for 160 points, it was enough to drive the index into the red for the year so far. Ahead on NEWSNIGHT, on to something real, reality TV that is a look at why the villains are often the best parts. James, you can stick around for that if you want.We'll be right back. This is NEWSNIGHT. 

(COMMERCIAL BREAK) 

COOPER: Well, it has become the ultimate consolation prize for those who fail to make the cut in that ever-expanding corner of popular culture. When reality bites, Hollywood steps in. After getting the boots, the agents start calling, at least for a little bit. Even the least likable losers, the one everyone loves to hate, get wooed. Omarosa, for example, she was fired by Donald Trump, fired on last week's episode of "The Apprentice." She cried. It didn't work. She got fired. Now she says she's fielding offers to host a talk show. I have my doubts, but that's what she says. What is up with us? Matt Kunitz should know. He's the executive producer of "Fear Factor." He joins us now from Los Angeles. Matt, thanks for being on the program. 

MATT KUNITZ, EXECUTIVE PRODUCER, "FEAR FACTOR": Thanks for having me.

COOPER: First of all, does a woman like Omarosa have a future in TV or is it impossible to predict? 

KUNITZ: I would say the odds are slim. I've seen hundreds and hundreds of reality contestants come on the shows, whether it be "Real World" or "Fear Factor." And after they have their 15 minutes of fame, they all another to just push it for that 16, 17 minutes. And I could count on one hand the few people that have probably actually made a career out of it. 

COOPER: And explain the process of why that happens. What is that transformation? Because I know when you're recruiting people, when you are auditioning people to be on these shows, you're not looking for people who want to be actors, because those are the people you kind of don't really want.

KUNITZ: Right. No, we avoid actors. And we tell everyone when we're casting them that, don't come on this show to become famous. It's a not going to happen. On a show like "Fear Factor," come on the show because you want to challenge yourself, you want to have a great time, or maybe you want to win $50,000. But you're not going to become famous out of this. And no one listens. And they all come on. And, eventually, a week after it airs, they all start calling my office, saying, can you set me up with some meetings and, you know, can you make me famous? 

COOPER: And now William Hung has made your job I think a lot more difficult, because now anyone, even if you have completely no talent, might be able to get a record deal, because that's just the amazing thing about how TV works. 

KUNITZ: Well, he's definitely one of the rare ones. And he's more of a novelty act. He's not going to get your job. 

COOPER: Well, who knows.

(LAUGHTER) 

COOPER: How is it -- who is it who does make it? I was trying to think before you came on about what reality show contestants have really sort of continued on. And Richard Hatch comes to mind. But he's sort of faded. 

KUNITZ: But he hasn't really continued on in an entertainment career. There's very, very few people. There's Elisabeth, who is now a host on "The View." There's a couple people that have made it into soap operas. I can think, from "Real World," Jacinda Barrett has become an actress. but she didn't become an actress because she was on "The Real World." She became an actress because this is what her focus in life was. And she went and she studied acting. And she stopped doing challenges and stopped showing up to reunions and kind of said, I am going to put that reality world behind me and I'm really going to hone my craft. And she's a rare exception. 

COOPER: And I guess if you knew the answer to this next question, you'd probably be more even successful than you already are, if that's even possible. Where does reality TV go from here? It feels like everything has been done. And, of course, once you think it feels like that, someone comes up with something else and you say, gosh, why didn't I think of that?

KUNITZ: You know what? I think reality is going to be around for a long time. You look at sitcoms and dramas. And there's always going to be terrible sitcoms and terrible dramas, but there will be a few that rise to the top. And I think the same will happen with reality. There's going to be great reality shows and there's going to be reality shows that just don't make it. But it's definitely a genre that is here to stay. 

COOPER: And when you're casting, how much of it is looking for individuals? how much of it is looking for how those individuals will actually sort of blend and/or fight together? Do you look for a villain like Omarosa? 

KUNITZ: Sure. On a show like "Fear Factor," we are looking for huge characters. It's kind of like -- we say it's a little bit like the WWF. You want people you are going to either love or love to hate. You don't want someone that's in between. It's a show that is only going to last for an hour. These people are not going to be around from episode to episode. So you need characters that people can immediately relate to. And either it's that person that I can't stand or I love that person. People at home are living vicariously through the contestants on the screen. So we give them a diverse group of people, so that everybody can hopefully relate to someone that they're watching. 

COOPER: And I suppose now you are getting people who have grown up educated -- I mean, educated, if that's the word -- watching these reality shows. And so they sort of know how to play along. And I'm assuming that's something you don't really want, because it ends up not looking real. 

KUNITZ: You mean the contestant knows how to play along? 

COOPER: Yes, the contestants, yes 

KUNITZ: Certainly. When we did the first season of "Fear Factor," the contestants coming on the show had no idea what they were getting into. So you have got that true fear. And now everyone that applies is like, I love to go parachuting and bungee-jumping and scuba-diving. And I don't want that kind of contestant. I want to put ordinary people in extraordinary situations. 

COOPER: And I guess you want people who really haven't seen the show, so they register that surprise. 

KUNITZ: Well, unfortunately, at this point, that's impossible.

(LAUGHTER) 

COOPER: That's impossible. Yes, that's true.All right, Matt Kunitz, appreciate you joining us. Thanks. It was interesting.

KUNITZ: Thank you. 

COOPER: All right, still ahead on NEWSNIGHT, "Look At It This Way," our weekly photography series from a man who most of you know from in front of the camera. Around the world, this is NEWSNIGHT. 

(COMMERCIAL BREAK) 

COOPER: When it comes to Hollywood, we tend to see our stars either 20 feet tall in a darkened room or 500 yards away through a telephoto lens, giving us, I suppose, a good angle on swashbuckling on the one hand and canoodling on the other, but little or none of what an actor's life is really about, none of the waiting, the anticipation, the loneliness in a crowd or the intimacy. Tonight, an antidote, pictures you won't see in the tabloids or between the covers of a very special edition of "In Touch, "Us," "People" monthly. They are collected in a book and an exhibition, the work of photographer Jeff Bridges. Maybe you've heard of him.

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE) 

JEFF BRIDGES, ACTOR: I'm interested in showing what it's like making movies from my particular spot, which is a little bit different than a still photographer or a guest on the set. In this shot of Peter, it's an actor's point of view of what it feels like to have the director lining up the shot. To me, the camera views the world more like our eye does. It seems to have almost a peripheral vision. So you'll have, you know, this group up here. Here's the director, Bill Richard (ph), with the prop guy and assistant director. And they're in a very intense conversation about this prop. And then you have the script girl transferring her notes, these guys over here, the construction workers, having some conversation. There's Bianca (ph) waiting for them to get their act together, so they can get the shot. You have a lot of different worlds on one negative. I'm kind of conflicted about how much about making movies I show, because I'm guilty of the very thing that I object to, which is behind the scenes, where they show how it's all made. And I'm hoping that it doesn't destroy the illusion too much and people still enjoy going to see these movies. Here's a shot of Gil Combs (ph), my stuntman on a movie called "Fearless." He's standing on the edge of a building. He feels very safe because this man here is holding on to his foot. 

(LAUGHTER) 

BRIDGES: Michelle is a beautiful person to focus on. She was so spectacular in that role, sang so beautifully and pulled that part off so wonderfully. And we took all day to light this shot, because the camera was on this huge boom here, had to do a complete 360 around this piano. And it was a perfect time to break out the old Widelux and shoot. I use a Widelux camera, which is a panning still camera. It's a 28-millimeter lens that actually moves while you're taking the shot. One of the things that you can do with this camera, because of this slow panning aspect of it, is that I can include the same person in different expressions onto the one negative by moving the camera and having the person move. It's kind of my take on the Greek tragedy and comedy of masks. Working with my dad, God, he was such a great, great guy. He loved show business so much, all aspects of it. He was so enthusiastic about it and taught my brother and me all the basics. And then, as an adult, I got to work with him twice in "Tucker" and also "Blown Away." And that was a real, real thrill. Whenever he walked on the set, this joy would just permeate through the set and everybody's work would kind of raise up a notch, and say, oh, yes, this is fun, what we're doing. There's one shot in this book that I included that I did not take. It's from "Seabiscuit," but I love the image. Many of those people in the stands were actually inflatable dolls. And so I had this image. I said, wouldn't it be great to get in amongst the inflatable dolls and challenge folks who look at the picture to say, where is Waldo in this shot? Where is Jeff?

(END VIDEOTAPE) 

COOPER: There he was. Next, we'll update you on our top story and preview tomorrow.We'll be right back. 

(COMMERCIAL BREAK) 

COOPER: A quick look at our top story. President Bush was in the battleground state of Ohio today defending his economic policies. Trade was a central issue of his speech, a hot-button in a state which has lost more than 100,000 manufacturing jobs since Mr. Bush took office. While he was making his case in the Rust Belt, his presumptive opponent, John Kerry, was laying into the president's handling of the economy and more. And so it goes. Tomorrow on NEWSNIGHT, the big business in human body parts, hundreds of millions of dollars a year, all in the name of scientific research. But some people are profiting illegally from the sales. The scandal at UCLA is shining a light on it all. That is NEWSNIGHT for tonight. Thanks for watching. I'm Anderson Cooper. I'll see you here tomorrow night. And I hope to see you as well at 7:00 p.m. Eastern time on "ANDERSON COOPER 360." Coming up next for most of you, the man who just won't say my name. 

TO ORDER A VIDEO OF THIS TRANSCRIPT, PLEASE CALL 800-CNN-NEWS OR USE OUR SECURE ONLINE ORDER FORM LOCATED AT www.fdch.comWithout Charges After 2 Years in Camp X-Ray>